Entry & Entry Summary · asked by @Broking_Bad · 2026-09-09 · 1 reply
Got a CF-28
Got a CF-28 last Thursday on three entries from June asking for proof of payment and the purchase agreement with the supplier. Importer is a small guy, buys through a trading company in Taiwan, and he's telling me the only thing he has is the pro forma and his wire confirmations. No contract, nothing showing what the trading company paid the factory. He pays in one lump sum.
So I'm pretty sure the value we declared is the trading company's price to him, which is fine, but I can't prove what's in that lump sum and whether freight was actually deducted or not. 30 days is up next week.
Do I send what I have with a cover letter explaining the gap, or does that just invite a CF-29? I've done plenty of 28s but never one where the importer genuinely can't produce the docs. Don't want to overexplain and hand them a valuation issue they weren't looking for.
Replies
@BigBoss · 2026-09-09
The thing I would get straight before you write anything: who is your seller?
You bought from the trading company. Under 19 CFR 152.102(f) the price actually paid or payable is the total payment made by the buyer to, or for the benefit of, the seller. That is your price to the trading company. What the trading company paid the factory is a different sale, and it is only your problem if you are
claiming first sale. You are not. So the document you cannot get, the one showing the factory price, is not a hole in your declaration. It is a hole in a claim you never made.
That reframes the whole response. CBP asked for the purchase agreement with the supplier, and your supplier is the trading company. Send the pro forma, the wire confirmations, and whatever terms the trading company gave you. Wires tied to specific invoices are proof of payment. That is what the 28 is asking for.
The part I would go check tonight is the freight, because that is where your risk actually is.
152.102(f) puts international transportation, insurance and related services outside the price actually paid or payable, and 152.103(a)(1) Example 4 works it through: the ocean freight and insurance charge is excluded because transaction value excludes C.I.F. charges.
But the carve out only reaches an amount you can identify. Pull the three 7501s and see what you entered. If the entered value equals the lump sum, you deducted nothing, you have nothing to defend, and your answer is short. If it is lower, something gave your entry writer a freight number and you need to find what. If nothing supports it, the conservative position is that the whole lump sum is the price actually paid or payable, and the fix is a tender, not an argument.
On the cover letter, send it. The instinct not to overexplain is right in plenty of places but a 28 is not one of them. A short factual letter saying here is thesale, here is the payment, here is why no separate factory agreement exists, is the thing that closes the file.
If next week is genuinely too tight, ask for more time before the date rather than after. Extensions get granted routinely when you ask early and say why.
Last thing so a 29 feels smaller than it does right now. It is a notice of proposed action, not a bill. 19 CFR 152.2 is the section, it triggers when the estimated increase in duties runs over $15, and liquidation holds at least 20 days from the mailing, so you get a window to respond. Getting one is not losing.
Free, built by exam candidates: real past-exam questions, the CFR and HTSUS one tap away, and the people studying for your sitting.
Join the discussion