CBLEsim

Title 19 CFR · 16 exam questions

19 CFR Part 174: Protests

19 CFR Part 174, section by section, with every released customs broker license exam question in the CBLEsim bank that tests it. Drawn from 10 released sittings, April 2019 through October 2025.

Edition shown: the 2025 annual edition of Title 19, revised as of April 1, 2025. It is the edition the October 2026 customs broker exam is graded against, and it can differ from the regulation in force today. For the current official text see 19 CFR Part 174 on eCFR.

Sections of Part 174

Every section opens in place. A linked section has its own page, with the exam questions that turn on it.

§ 174.0Scope

This part deals with the administrative review of decisions of the port director and Center director, including the requirements for the filing of protests against such decisions, amendment of protests, review and accelerated disposition, and provisions dealing with further administrative review. Provisions applicable to Canadian and Mexican exporters and producers regarding administrative review and appeal of adverse marking decisions under the North American Free Trade Agreement are contained in part 181 of this chapter.

§ 174.1Definitions

When used in this part, the following term shall have the meaning indicated:

Further review. “Further review” means review of the decision which is the subject of the protest by Customs officers on a level higher than the district, and in Region II by Customs officers who did not participate directly in the decision which is the subject of the protest.

§ 174.2Applicability of provisions

(a) In general. The provisions of this part shall be applicable to protests against decisions involving:

(1) Articles excluded from entry or entered or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption on or after October 1, 1970;

(2) Articles entered or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption prior to October 1, 1970, for which appraisement has not become final by October 1, 1970;

(3) Articles entered or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption prior to October 1, 1970, for which the appraisement has become final but with respect to which the entry has not been liquidated prior to October 1, 1970;

(4) Articles entered or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption with respect to which the entry has been liquidated prior to October 1, 1970, if

(i) The time for filing a protest has not expired and a protest has not been filed prior to October 1, 1970; or

(ii) A protest has been filed and has not been disallowed in whole or in part before October 1, 1970; or

(5) Articles excluded from entry before October 1, 1970, with respect to which

(i) The time for filing a protest has not expired and a protest has not been filed prior to October 1, 1970; or

(ii) A protest has been filed and has not been disallowed in whole or in part before October 1, 1970.

(b) Limitation—(1) Appraisement not final. When the appraisement of articles entered or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption prior to October 1, 1970, is not final by October 1, 1970, because an appeal for reappraisement was timely filed prior to such date, the provisions of this part relating to protests shall be applicable to a protest filed after the court's decision on the appeal to reappraisement has become final. Such protest shall not include issues which were raised or could have been raised on the appeal for reappraisement.

(2) Appraisement final. When the appraisement of articles entered or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption prior to October 1, 1970, has become final prior to October 1, 1970, but the entry has not been liquidated by such date, a protest filed in accordance with the provisions of this part after such liquidation shall not include issues which were raised or could have been raised on an appeal to reappraisement before the appraisement became final.

(3) Protest not disallowed. When a protest filed prior to October 1, 1970, has not been disallowed in whole or in part before such date, the provisions of this part shall be applicable to such protests. The time within which any action must be taken under the provisions of this part with respect to such a protest shall commence on the date the protest was in fact filed.

§ 174.3Power of attorney to file protest

(a) When required. When a protest is filed by a person acting as agent or attorney in fact for the principal, other than an attorney at law or a customhouse broker or his authorized employee acting in his behalf, there shall have been filed or shall be filed with the protest a power of attorney which either specifically authorizes such agent to make, sign, and file the protest or grants unlimited authority to such agent. No power of attorney to file a protest shall be required in the following cases:

(1) Attorney at law. When the protest is filed by an attorney at law as agent or attorney for the principal, the signing of the protest as agent or attorney for the principal by the attorney at law shall be considered a declaration by him that he is currently a member in good standing of the highest court of a State, possession, territory, commonwealth, or the District of Columbia, and has been authorized to sign and file the protest for the principal.

(2) Customhouse broker or his employee. When a protest is filed by a customhouse broker, or an authorized employee acting in his behalf, as agent or attorney in fact for the principal, the signing of the protest by the customhouse broker or an authorized employee in his behalf shall be considered a declaration by the broker that he or the employee signing in his behalf, is authorized to sign and file the protest for the principal. The customhouse broker shall have, however, a general power of attorney to transact Customs business for the principal on Customs Form 5291.

(b) Execution of power of attorney—(1) Corporation. A corporate power of attorney to file protests shall be signed by a duly authorized officer or employee of the corporation. If the Center director is otherwise satisfied as to the authority of such corporate officer or employee to grant such power of attorney, compliance with the requirements of § 141.37 of this chapter may be waived with respect to such power.

(2) Partnership. A partnership power of attorney to file protests may be signed by one member in the name of the partnership, provided the power recites the name of all the members.

(c) Duration. Powers of attorney issued by a partnership shall be limited to a period not to exceed 2 years from the date of receipt thereof by the Center director. All other powers of attorney may be granted for an unlimited period.

(d) Revocation. Any power of attorney shall be subject to revocation at any time by written notice given to and received by CBP, either at the port of entry or electronically.

§ 174.11Matters subject to protest

The following decisions of CBP, including the legality of all orders and findings entering into those decisions, may be protested under the provisions of section 514, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1514):

(a) Clerical errors, mistakes of fact, and other inadvertences. Except as provided for in sections 501 (relating to voluntary reliquidations), 516 (relating to petitions by domestic interested parties), and 520 (related to refunds) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended), any clerical error, mistake of fact, or other inadvertence, whether or not resulting from or contained in an electronic submission, that is adverse to the importer in any entry, liquidation or reliquidation is subject to protest. In addition, any entry, liquidation, or other CBP transaction that occurred prior to December 18, 2004, also may be the subject of a reliquidation request made pursuant to the terms set forth in § 173.4 (19 CFR 173.4).

(b) Administrative decisions. CBP administrative decisions involving the following subject matters are subject to protest:

(1) The appraised value of merchandise;

(2) The classification and rate and amount of duties chargeable;

(3) All charges or exactions of whatever character, including the accrual of interest, within the jurisdiction of the Secretary of Homeland Security or the Secretary of the Treasury;

(4) The exclusion of merchandise from entry, delivery, or a demand for redelivery to CBP custody under any provision of the customs laws except a determination that may be appealed under 19 U.S.C. 1337;

(5) The liquidation or reliquidation of an entry, or any modification of an entry;

(6) The refusal to pay a claim for drawback;

(7) The refusal to reliquidate an entry made before December 18, 2004, under section 520(c), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1520(c)); or

(8) The refusal to reliquidate an entry under section 520(d), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1520(d)).

§ 174.12Filing of protests

(a) By whom filed. Protests may be filed by:

(1) The importer or consignee shown on the entry papers, or their sureties;

(2) Any person paying or receiving a refund of any charge or exaction;

(3) Any person seeking entry or delivery;

(4) Any person filing a claim for drawback;

(5) With respect to a determination of origin under subpart G of part 181 of this chapter, any exporter or producer of the merchandise subject to that determination, if the exporter or producer completed and signed a Certificate of Origin covering the merchandise as provided for in § 181.11(a) of this chapter;

(6) With respect to a determination of origin under part 182, subpart G, of this chapter, any exporter or producer of the merchandise subject to the determination of origin, if the exporter or producer completed and signed a certification of origin covering the merchandise as provided for in § 182.12 of this chapter; or

(7) Any authorized agent of any of the persons described in paragraphs (a)(1) through (6) of this section, subject to the provisions of § 174.3.

(b) Form and number of copies. A written protest against a decision of CBP must be filed in quadruplicate on CBP Form 19 or a form of the same size clearly labeled “Protest” and setting forth the same content in its entirety, in the same order, addressed to CBP. All schedules or other attachments to a protest (other than samples or similar exhibits) must also be filed in quadruplicate. A protest against a decision of CBP may also be transmitted electronically pursuant to any electronic data interchange system authorized by CBP for that purpose. Electronic submissions are not required to be filed in quadruplicate.

(c) Identity of filer. The identity of the person filing the protest or his agent, or attorney shall be noted on the protest. This may be accomplished through a signature which is handwritten in ink, stamped, typed, facsimile, telefax, or by electronic certification in CBP Automated Commercial Environment (ACE) or any other CBP-authorized electronic data interchange system. If the person filing the protest is not the importer of record or consignee, the filer shall include his address and importer number, if any.

(d) Place of filing. Protests shall be filed with CBP, either at the port of entry or electronically.

(e) Time of filing. Protests must be filed, in accordance with section 514, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1514), within 90 days of a decision relating to an entry made before December 18, 2004, or within 180 days of a decision relating to an entry made on or after December 18, 2004, after any of the following:

(1) The date of notice of liquidation or reliquidation, or the date of liquidation or reliquidation, as determined under §§ 159.9 or 159.10 of this chapter;

(2) The date of the decision, involving neither a liquidation nor reliquidation, as to which the protest is made (for example: The date of an exaction; the date of written notice excluding merchandise from entry, delivery or demanding redelivery to CBP custody under any provision of the customs laws; the date of written notice of a denial of a claim filed under section 520(d), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1520(d)), or; within 90 days of the date of denial of a petition filed pursuant to section 520(c)(1), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1520(c)(1)), relating to an entry made before December 18, 2004); or

(3) The date of mailing of notice of demand for payment against a bond in the case of a surety which has an unsatisfied legal claim under a bond written by the surety.

(f) Date of filing. The date on which a protest is received by the Customs officer with whom it is required to be filed shall be deemed the date on which it is filed.

(g) Return of fifth copy. If a fifth copy of the protest is presented for the purpose of having recorded thereon the date of its receipt and the protest number assigned thereto, such information shall be recorded thereon and the fifth copy shall be returned to the person filing the protest.

Editorial Note:

§ 174.13Contents of protest

(a) Contents, in general. A protest shall contain the following information:

(1) The name and address of the protestant, i.e., the importer of record or consignee, and the name and address of his agent or attorney if signed by one of these;

(2) The importer number of the protestant. If the protestant is represented by an agent having power of attorney, the importer number of the agent shall also be shown;

(3) The number and date of the entry;

(4) The date of liquidation of the entry, or the date of a decision not involving a liquidation or reliquidation;

(5) A specific description of the merchandise affected by the decision as to which protest is made;

(6) The nature of, and justification for the objection set forth distinctly and specifically with respect to each category, payment, claim, decision, or refusal;

(7) The date of receipt and protest number of any protest previously filed that is the subject of a pending application for further review pursuant to subpart C of this part and that is alleged to involve the same merchandise and the same issues, if the protesting party requests disposition in accordance with the action taken on such previously filed protest;

(8) If another party has not filed a timely protest, the surety's protest shall certify that the protest is not being filed collusively to extend another authorized person's time to protest; and

(9) A declaration, to the best of the protestant's knowledge, as to whether the entry is the subject of drawback, or if there is the ability for a party to make such entry the subject of drawback (see §§ 181.50, 182.50, 190.81, and 191.81 of this chapter).

(b) Multiple entries. A single protest may be filed with respect to more than one entry with CBP, either at any port or electronically if all such entries involve the same protesting party, and if the same category of merchandise and a decision or decisions common to all entries are the subject of the protest. In such circumstances, the entry numbers, dates of entry, and dates of liquidation of all such entries should be set forth as an attachment to the protest.

(c) Optional designation for refunds. If desired by the importer/consignee the statement “any refunds with respect to the entry under protest shall be mailed to the importer/consignee in care of ________________________”

(Name and Address of Agent)

may be appended to the protest. This designation supersedes any existing designation previously authorized on Customs Form 4811.

§ 174.14Amendment of protests

(a) Time for filing. A protest may be amended at any time prior to the expiration of the period within which the protest may be filed under § 174.12(e). The amendment may assert additional claims pertaining to the administrative decision that is the subject of the protest, or may challenge an additional administrative decision relating to the same category of merchandise that is the subject of the protest. For the presentation of additional grounds or arguments in support of a valid protest after the applicable protest period set forth in § 174.12(e) has expired, see § 174.28.

(b) Form and number of copies of amendment. If the protest was not filed electronically, an amendment to the protest must be filed in quadruplicate on CBP Form 19 or on a form of the same size, clearly labeled “Amendment to Protest” at the top of the form. Schedules or other attachments (other than samples or similar exhibits) must also be filed in quadruplicate. A protest that was transmitted to CBP electronically may be amended only through an electronic data interchange system authorized by CBP for that purpose. Electronic submissions are not required to be filed in quadruplicate.

(c) Contents. An amendment to a protest shall contain the following information:

(1) The name, address, and importer number of the protesting party, i.e., the importer of record or consignee, and the name and address of his agent or attorney if filed by one of these;

(2) The number and date of filing of the original protest;

(3) A specific description of the merchandise affected by the decision as to which the amendment to the protest is filed;

(4) The nature of and justification for the objection raised by the amendment set forth distinctly and specifically with respect to each category, payment, claim, decision, or refusal; and

(5) The date of receipt and protest number of any protest previously filed that is the subject of a pending application for further review and that is alleged to involve the same merchandise and the same issues involved in the amendment.

(d) Identification of filer. An amendment to a protest may be filed only by the person who originally filed such protest or his agent or attorney subject to the provisions of § 174.3. The identity of the filer shall be noted on the amendment to a protest. Any acceptable method used to identify the filer described in § 174.12(c) as being acceptable on a protest will be acceptable on an amendment to a protest.

(e) Place and date of filing. An amendment to a protest shall be filed with CBP, either at the port of entry or electronically . The amendment shall be deemed filed on the date it is received by the Customs officer.

(f) Return of fifth copy. If a fifth copy of the amendment is presented for the purpose of having recorded thereon the date of its receipt, such information shall be recorded thereon and the fifth copy shall be returned to the person filing the amendment.

§ 174.15Consolidation of protests filed by different parties

(a) General. Subject to paragraph (b) of this section, separate protests relating to one category of merchandise covered by an entry shall be considered as a single protest whether filed as a single protest or filed as separate protests relating to the same category by one or more parties in interest or an authorized agent.

(b) NAFTA or USMCA transactions. The following rules shall apply to a consolidation of multiple protests concerning a determination of origin under part 181, subpart G, or part 182, subpart G, of this chapter if one of the protests is filed by or on behalf of an exporter or producer described in § 174.12(a)(5) or (a)(6) of this part:

(1) If consolidation under paragraph (a) of this section is pursuant to specific written requests for consolidation received from all interested parties who filed protests under this part, those interested parties shall be deemed to have waived their rights to confidentiality as regards business information within the meaning of § 181.121 of this chapter for NAFTA transactions or within the meaning of § 182.2 of this chapter for USMCA transactions. In such cases, a separate notice of the decision will be issued to each interested party under this part but without regard to whether the notice reflects confidential business information obtained from one but not all of those interested parties.

(2) If consolidation under paragraph (a) of this section is done by the port director or Center director, before January 19, 2017, or the Center director on or after January 19, 2017, in the absence of specific written requests for consolidation from all interested parties who filed protests under this part, no waiver of confidentiality by those interested parties shall be deemed to have taken place. In such cases, a separate notice of the decision will be issued to each interested party and each such notice shall adhere to the principle of confidentiality set forth in § 181.121 of this chapter for NAFTA transactions or § 182.2 of this chapter for USMCA transactions.

§ 174.16Limitation on protests after reliquidation

A protest shall not be filed against the reliquidation decision of the port director or Center director made before January 19, 2017, or the reliquidation decision of the Center director made on or after January 19, 2017, upon any question not involved in the reliquidation.

§ 174.21Time for review of protests

(a) In general. Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, the Center director shall review and act on a protest filed in accordance with section 514, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1514), within 2 years from the date the protest was filed. If several timely filed protests are treated as part of a single protest pursuant to § 174.15, the 2-year period shall be deemed to run from the date the last such protest was filed in accordance with section 514, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1514).

(b) Protests relating to exclusion of merchandise. If the protest relates to an administrative action involving exclusion of merchandise from entry or delivery under any provision of the Customs laws, the Center director shall review and act on a protest filed in accordance with section 514(a)(4), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1514(a)(4)), within 30 days from the date the protest was filed. Any protest filed pursuant to this paragraph shall clearly so state on its face. Any protest filed pursuant to this paragraph which is not allowed or denied in whole or in part before the 30th day after the day on which the protest was filed shall be treated as having been denied on such 30th day for purposes of 28 U.S.C. 1581.

§ 174.22Accelerated disposition of protest

(a) Request for accelerated disposition. Accelerated disposition of a protest filed in accordance with section 514, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1514) may be obtained at any time after 90 days from the filing of such protest for entries made before December 18, 2004, or at any time concurrent with or following the filing of the protest for entries made on or after December 18, 2004, by filing by registered or certified mail a written request for accelerated disposition with the port director, Center director, or other CBP officer with whom the protest was filed. Accelerated disposition of a protest is not available for protests involving eligibility for USMCA preferential tariff treatment of a covered vehicle if the protest relates to the Department of Labor's analysis of the high-wage components of the labor value content (LVC) requirements as described under § 182.105(e) of this chapter.

(b) Contents of request. A request for accelerated disposition of protest shall contain the following information:

(1) The name, address, and importer number of the protestant, i.e., the importer of record or consignee, and the name and address of his agent or attorney if filed by one of these; and

(2) The date of filing and number of the protest for which accelerated disposition is requested.

(c) Review following request. The Center director shall review the protest which is the subject of the request within 30 days from the date of mailing of a request for accelerated disposition filed in accordance with the provisions of this section, and may allow or deny the protest in whole or in part.

(d) Failure to allow or deny protest within 30-day period. If the Center director fails to allow or deny a protest which is the subject of a request for accelerated disposition within 30 days from the date of mailing of such request, the protest shall be deemed to have been denied at the close of the 30th day following such date of mailing.

(e) Multiple protests. If several protests by different persons are timely filed and treated as part of a single protest pursuant to § 174.15, a request for accelerated disposition filed by any one of the protesting parties shall be treated as a request for accelerated disposition by all the parties.

§ 174.23Further review of protests

A protesting party may seek further review of a protest in lieu of review by the Center director by filing, on the form prescribed in § 174.25, an application for such review within the time allowed and in the manner prescribed by § 174.12 for the filing of a protest. The filing of an application for further review shall not preclude a preliminary examination by the Center director for the purpose of determining whether the protest may be allowed in full. If such preliminary examination indicates that the protest would be denied in whole or in part by the Center director in the absence of an application for further review; however, he shall forward the protest and application for consideration in accordance with § 174.26.

§ 174.24Criteria for further review

Further review of a protest which would otherwise be denied by the Center director shall be accorded a party filing an application for further review which meets the requirements of § 174.25 when the decision against which the protest was filed:

(a) Is alleged to be inconsistent with a ruling of the Commissioner of CBP or his designee, or with a decision made by CBP with respect to the same or substantially similar merchandise;

(b) Is alleged to involve questions of law or fact which have not been ruled upon by the Commissioner of CBP or his designee or by the Customs courts;

(c) Involves matters previously ruled upon by the Commissioner of CBP or his designee or by the Customs courts but facts are alleged or legal arguments presented which were not considered at the time of the original ruling; or

(d) Is alleged to involve questions which the Headquarters Office, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, refused to consider in the form of a request for internal advice pursuant to § 177.11(b)(5) of this chapter.

§ 174.25Application for further review

(a) Form and number of copies. An application for further review may be filed on the same Customs Form 19 used for filing the protest for which further review is requested, or on a separate Customs Form 19. In either case, the Customs Form 19 shall be filed in quadruplicate. If a fifth copy of the application is presented for the purpose of having recorded thereon the date of its receipt, such information shall be recorded thereon and the fifth copy shall be returned to the person filing the application.

(b) Contents. An application for further review shall contain the following information:

(1) Information identifying the protest to which it applies and the protesting party and his importer number;

(2) Allegations that the protesting party:

(i) Has not previously received an adverse administrative decision from the Commissioner of Customs or his designee nor has presently pending an application for an administrative decision on the same claim with respect to the same category of merchandise; and

(ii) Has not received a final adverse decision from the Customs courts on the same claim with respect to the same category of merchandise and does not have an action involving such a claim pending before the Customs courts.

(3) A statement of any facts or additional legal arguments, not part of the record, upon which the protesting party relies, including the criterion set forth in § 174.24 which justifies further review. A showing of facts that support the allegation of a criterion set forth in § 174.24(c) will constitute a ground for the granting of further review in circumstances where the applicant's inability to affirmatively make the allegations described in paragraph (b)(2) of this section would otherwise result in its denial.

§ 174.26Review of protest after application for further review

(a) Protest allowed. If upon examination of a protest for which an application for further review was filed the Center director is satisfied that the claim is valid, he shall allow the protest.

(b) Other protests. If upon examination of a protest for which an application for further review was filed the Center director decides that the protest in his judgment should be denied in whole or in part, the Center director will forward the application together with the protest and appropriate documents to be reviewed as follows:

(1) A protest shall be reviewed by the Commissioner of Customs or his designee under Customs Delegation Order No. 1 (Revision 1), T.D. 69-126 (34 FR 8208), as amended from time to time, if the protest and application for review raise an issue involving either:

(i) Lack of uniformity of treatment;

(ii) The existence of an established and uniform practice;

(iii) The interpretation of a court decision or ruling of the Commissioner of Customs or his designee; or

(iv) Questions which have not been the subject of a Headquarters, U.S. Customs Service ruling or court decision.

(2) All other protests shall be reviewed by a designee of the Center director who did not participate directly in the decision which is the subject of the protest.

§ 174.27Disposition after further review

Upon completion of further review, the protest and appropriate documents forwarded for review shall be returned to the Center director together with directions for the disposition of the protest.

§ 174.28Consideration of additional arguments

In determining whether to allow or deny a protest filed within the time allowed, a reviewing officer may consider alternative claims and additional grounds or arguments submitted in writing by the protesting party with respect to any decision which is the subject of a valid protest at any time prior to disposition of the protest. In any case in which alternative claims or additional grounds or arguments are submitted orally, they shall be considered in the allowance or denial of the protest only if submitted in writing in conjunction with, or no later than 60 days after, such oral submission.

§ 174.29Allowance or denial of protests

The Center director shall allow or deny in whole or in part a protest filed in accordance with section 514, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, (19 U.S.C. 1514) within 2 years from the date the protest was filed. If the protest is allowed in whole or in part the Center director shall remit or refund any duties, charge, or exaction found to have been collected in excess, or pay any drawback found due. If a protest of an exporter or producer under § 174.12(a)(5) or (a)(6) of this part is allowed in whole or in part, any monies found to have been collected in excess shall be refunded to the party who paid the monies even if such party did not file an appropriate and timely protest under this part. If the protest is denied in whole or in part the Center director shall give notice of the denial in the form and manner prescribed in § 174.30.

§ 174.30Notice of denial of protest

(a) Issuance of notice. Notice of denial of a protest shall be mailed to any person filing a protest or his agent in all cases other than those in which accelerated disposition was requested and in which no action has been taken within 30 days after the date of mailing of the request. The notice shall include a statement of the reasons for the denial, as well as a statement informing the protesting party of the right to file a civil action contesting the denial of the protest under section 514, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1514). For purposes of section 515(a), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1515(a)), the date appearing on such notice shall be deemed the date on which such notice was mailed.

(b) Substitution of persons designated to receive notice. The importer of record or consignee may give notice to CBP, either at the port of entry or electronically, instructing that notice of denial of any protest involving merchandise imported in his name or on his behalf shall be mailed to a person other than the person filing such protest or the designee of such person. Such notice of substitution shall be filed in quadruplicate and shall identify the protest by number and date of receipt. Notice of denial of a protest shall be mailed to the substituted person so designated only if the notice of substitution is received by the CBP prior to a denial by him of such protest.

(c) Notification of payment of increased duties. The Center director shall note on the notice of denial of a protest the payment of all liquidated duties, charges, or exactions, if he has actual knowledge of such payment at the time that the protest is denied.

§ 174.31Judicial review of denial of protest

Any person whose protest has been denied, in whole or in part, may contest the denial by filing a civil action in the United States Court of International Trade in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 2632 within 180 days after—

(a) The date of mailing of notice of denial, in whole or in part, of a protest,

(b) The date a protest, for which accelerated disposition was requested, is deemed to have been denied in accordance with § 174.22(d), or

(c) The date that a protest is deemed denied in accordance with § 174.21(b), or § 151.16(g) of this chapter.

§ 174.32Publication

Within 90 calendar days after issuing a protest review decision, CBP will publish the decision in the Customs Bulletin or otherwise make it available for public inspection. Disclosure is governed by 6 CFR part 5 and 19 CFR part 103.

Exam questions from Part 174

April 2019, Q23. A broker files a protest requesting accelerated disposition. How many days from the date of mailing of the protest does the port director have to make a decision on it?

  1. A30
  2. B60
  3. C90
  4. D120
  5. E180
Show the answer and explanation
Correct answer: A  · Authority: 19 CFR 174.22(c)

The correct answer is A) 30 because 19 CFR 174.22(c) explicitly states that the Center director must review the protest within 30 days from the date of mailing the request for accelerated disposition. The other options (B–E) are incorrect because the cited authority does not mention any longer timeframe for decision-making; the rule is strictly 30 days as outlined in the text. The provision in (d) further reinforces this by stating that failure to act within 30 days results in the protest being deemed denied, confirming the 30-day limit.

April 2019, Q35. An entry made on July 18, 2003 is under a statutory suspension of liquidation because it is subject to an antidumping order and is later liquidated on December 20, 2004. A protest must be filed in order to be considered timely filed.

  1. Awithin 180 days of December 20, 2004, the date of liquidation
  2. Bwithin 90 days of December 20, 2004, the date of liquidation
  3. Cwithin one year of December 20, 2004, the date of liquidation
  4. Dwithin one year of July 18, 2003, the date entry
  5. E30 days before December 20, 2004, the date of liquidation
Show the answer and explanation
Correct answer: B  · Authority: 19 CFR 174.12(e)(1)

The correct answer is B because 19 CFR 174.12(e)(1) specifies that protests must be filed within 90 days of the liquidation date for entries made before December 18, 2004. The entry in question was made on July 18, 2003, which is before the cutoff date, and the liquidation occurred on December 20, 2004, triggering the 90-day period. Option A (180 days) applies only to entries made on or after December 18, 2004, which is not the case here. Options C, D, and E are inconsistent with the 90-day rule explicitly stated in the cited authority.

April 2022, Q52. An entry made on July 18, 2003 is under a statutory suspension of liquidation because it is subject to an anti-dumping duty (ADD) order and is later liquidated on December 20, 2014. When must a protest be filed to be considered timely?

  1. AWithin 180 days of December 20, 2014, the date of liquidation
  2. BWithin 90 days of December 20, 2014, the date of liquidation
  3. CWithin 1 year of December 20, 2014, the date of liquidation
  4. DWithin 1 year of July 18, 2003, the date entry
  5. E30 days before December 20, 2014, the date of liquidation
Show the answer and explanation
Correct answer: B  · Authority: 19 CFR 174.12(e)

The correct answer is B because 19 CFR 174.12(e) specifies that protests must be filed within 90 days of a decision (such as liquidation) for entries made before December 18, 2004. The entry here was made on July 18, 2003, which falls before the cutoff date, triggering the 90-day rule. Option A (180 days) applies only to entries made on or after December 18, 2004, which is not the case here. Option C (1 year) is not mentioned in the cited text. Option D (1 year from the entry date) ignores the regulation’s focus on the liquidation date. Option E (30 days before liquidation) misinterprets the timeline entirely.

May 2024, Q14. In which of the following circumstances is a power of attorney required when filing a protest?

  1. AWhen the protest is filed directly by the importer.
  2. BWhen the protest is filed by the importer’s attorney-at-law.
  3. CWhen a protest is filed by the importer's agent, and that agent is not an attorney at law, a licensed customs broker, or an authorized employee of a licensed customs broker.
  4. DA power of attorney is not required to file a protest.
Show the answer and explanation
Correct answer: C  · Authority: 19 CFR 174.3(a)

The correct answer is C because 19 CFR 174.3(a) explicitly requires a power of attorney when a protest is filed by an agent who is not an attorney at law, a licensed customs broker, or an authorized employee of a licensed customs broker. This rule applies only to such agents, as the exceptions in paragraphs (1) and (2) of the same section exempt attorneys and brokers from needing a power of attorney. Options A and B are incorrect because the rule does not require a power of attorney when the importer files directly or when the agent is an attorney. Option D is incorrect because the regulation clearly mandates a power of attorney in specific cases.

May 2024, Q58. Which one of the following matters is NOT subject to protest under 19 USC 1514?

  1. AThe classification and rate and amount of duties chargeable
  2. BThe appraised value of merchandise
  3. CThe refusal to reliquidate an entry made before December 18, 2006, under 19 USC 1520(c)
  4. DThe liquidation or reliquidation of an entry, or any modification of an entry
Show the answer and explanation
Correct answer: C  · Authority: 19 CFR 174.11

The correct answer is C because 19 CFR 174.11(b)(7) explicitly limits protests related to refusal to reliquidate entries to those made before December 18, 2004, not 2006 as stated in option C. The other options are directly covered by the listed subject matters in 19 CFR 174.11(b): A (classification and duties) is in (b)(2), B (appraised value) is in (b)(1), and D (liquidation or modification) is in (b)(5). The date discrepancy in C removes it from the scope of protestable matters under the cited authority.

October 2018, Q33. What is the regulation that defines matters subject to protest?

  1. A19 CFR 101.1
  2. B19 CFR 146.0
  3. C19 CFR 171.0
  4. D19 CFR 174.11
  5. E19 CFR 191.0
Show the answer and explanation
Correct answer: D  · Authority: 19 CFR 174.11

The correct answer is D because 19 CFR 174.11 explicitly lists the CBP decisions and actions subject to protest under section 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930, including appraised value, classification, duty rates, and other administrative determinations. Other options are incorrect because they do not address the specific matters outlined in the cited authority. For example, 19 CFR 101.1 governs general customs procedures, 19 CFR 146.0 relates to protests generally, 19 CFR 171.0 covers liquidation, and 19 CFR 191.0 pertains to entry requirements, none of which enumerate the detailed subject matters subject to protest as comprehensively as 174.11.

October 2019, Q65. If accelerated disposition is requested on a protest and it is not allowed or denied within 30 days from request for accelerated disposition what would the status of the protest be?

  1. AProtest is deemed approved.
  2. BProtest is forwarded to the Office of Rules and Regulations for further review.
  3. CProtest is deemed denied.
  4. DProtest stays open until decision is reached or 2 years from the filing date is reached when it will be deemed approved.
  5. EProtest is withdrawn allowing protestant to resubmit claim within 180 days of the protest withdrawal.
Show the answer and explanation
Correct answer: C  · Authority: 19 CFR 174.22

The correct answer is C because 19 CFR 174.22(d) explicitly states that if the Center director fails to allow or deny a protest within 30 days of a request for accelerated disposition, the protest is deemed denied at the close of the 30th day. This directly supports option C. Option A is incorrect because the regulation does not mention approval by default; denial is the only outcome specified for inaction. Option B is unsupported as the text does not reference forwarding to another office. Option D is invalid because the regulation does not mention a 2-year period or automatic approval. Option E is incorrect because the text does not address withdrawal or resubmission timelines.

October 2020 (AM), Q23. Who can conduct customs business without having issued a power of attorney to the broker?

  1. AImporter
  2. BEmployee of a broker
  3. CLawyer for the brokerage
  4. DPartnership
  5. EAttorney in Fact
Show the answer and explanation
Correct answer: C  · Authority: 19 CFR 174.3(1)

The correct answer is C) Lawyer for the brokerage because 19 CFR 174.3(1) explicitly states that an attorney at law filing a protest as an agent or attorney in fact does not require a power of attorney, as their signature alone is deemed sufficient proof of authorization. Other options, such as importers (A), employees of brokers (B), partnerships (D), and attorneys in fact (E), are either explicitly required to have a power of attorney under 19 CFR 174.3 or are not exempted from this requirement. The authority does not mention any exemption for importers, employees, or partnerships, nor does it grant general authority to attorneys in fact beyond the specific context of protests.

October 2020 (AM), Q40. Which statement regarding Protest filing is CORRECT?

  1. AProtests may be filed within 190 days after the date of liquidation or re-liquidation of an entry
  2. BCustoms has one year from the date the protest was filed to review and act on a protest
  3. CIf the Center director fails to allow or deny a protest that is the subject of a request for accelerated disposition within 30 days from the date of mailing of such request, the protest shall be deemed allowed
  4. DIf a protesting party has sought further review of a protest and the Center director, upon preliminary examination, indicates that the protest would be denied in whole or in part, the Center director shall forward the protest and application for consideration by the Commissioner of Customs or his designee if the protest raises an issue involving lack of uniformity in treatment
  5. EAny person whose protest has been denied, in whole or in part, may contest the denial by filing a civil action with a federal court located nearest to the port into which the merchandise at issue was imported
Show the answer and explanation
Correct answer: D  · Authority: 19 CFR 174.23 41 Credit to All 19 CFR 172.2(d)

The correct answer is D because 19 CFR 174.23 explicitly states that if the Center director's preliminary examination indicates a protest would be denied in whole or in part, the protest must be forwarded to the Commissioner or their designee if it raises an issue involving lack of uniformity in treatment. This matches the wording in option D. Option A is incorrect because the 180-day period for protest filing is specified in 19 CFR 172.2(d), not 190 days. Option B is unsupported as no one-year review period is mentioned in the cited text. Option C is incorrect because the 30-day rule for accelerated disposition is not tied to automatic allowance of a protest. Option E is not addressed in the cited authority, which focuses on administrative review, not judicial action.

October 2020 (PM), Q22. Which individual does not need to file a power of attorney (POA) when submitting a protest?

  1. AA person acting as agent
  2. BAttorney in fact for the principle
  3. CAttorney at law
  4. DCustomhouse broker
  5. EAuthorized employee of the broker
Show the answer and explanation
Correct answer: C  · Authority: 19 CFR 174.3(a)(1)

The correct answer is C because 19 CFR 174.3(a)(1) explicitly states that an attorney at law does not need a power of attorney when filing a protest, as their signature alone is deemed sufficient proof of authorization. Options A and B require a POA because they involve agents or attorneys in fact who are not exempted by the regulation. Options D and E are exempted under 19 CFR 174.3(a)(2), but the question asks which individual does not need a POA, and the answer must be the one explicitly named in the cited text. The regulation does not impose a POA requirement on attorneys at law, unlike the other roles listed.

October 2022, Q41. Dee Company GmbH (Dee) is a foreign-based company, but imports machinery into the U.S. XYZ Brokers (XYZ) has a valid power of attorney with Dee and has been the Customs broker for Dee for several years. Dee has executed a CBP Form 4811 naming XYZ. Dee has hired RT Protest Attorneys (RT) to file their protests. The protests contain language stating that refunds pursuant to an entry under protest shall be mailed to Dee in care of RT. To whom will CBP mail refund payments on protested entries?

  1. ACBP will mail the refund checks to Dee because refunds of protested entries are always mailed to the importer of record.
  2. BCBP will mail the refund checks to XYZ because the CBP Form 4811 names XYZ.
  3. CCBP will mail the refund checks to XYZ because the broker is responsible for paying monies to their clients under 19 CFR 111.29.
  4. DCBP will not mail the refund check but will apply the amount of the refund to the duties, taxes, and fees owed on the next entry until the credit is used.
  5. ECBP will mail the refund check to RT because the refund assignment language in a protest supersedes the assignment on the CBP Form 4811.
Show the answer and explanation
Correct answer: E  · Authority: 19 CFR 174.13(c)

The correct answer is E because 19 CFR 174.13(c) explicitly states that a protest may include language directing refunds to a specific address, which supersedes any prior designation on CBP Form 4811. This overrides the broker’s designation on the form, making RT the designated recipient. Option A is incorrect because the protest’s language, not the importer’s default status, determines the refund address. Option B and C are invalid because the protest’s explicit instruction takes precedence over the broker’s designation. Option D is unrelated, as the regulation addresses refund mailing, not application of credits.

October 2022, Q45. Which situation is a matter subject to protest?

  1. ABecause of a broker clerical error, only one of two invoices was entered on the entry summary. The second invoice needs to be added to the unliquidated entry summary.
  2. BCBP refused to allow amendment of a protest involving one entry 200 days after the underlying entry was liquidated.
  3. CCBP liquidated a drawback claim with a full refund on a drawback claim where the full amount was paid through the accelerated payment process.
  4. DCBP refused to flag an entry for reconciliation which was not flagged at entry summary filing in error.
  5. ECBP refused to liquidate or re-liquidate a post-summary 19 USC 1520(d) claim under the United States-Korea Free Trade Agreement filed in the ACE Protest Module.
Show the answer and explanation
Correct answer: E  · Authority: 19 CFR Part 174

The correct answer is E because 19 CFR Part 174 governs protests against CBP decisions, including those related to post-summary claims under agreements like the U.S.-Korea FTA. The situation in E involves a refusal to liquidate or re-liquidate a claim, which directly implicates CBP's administrative decision-making subject to protest. Option A involves a broker's error, not a CBP decision; B references a protest filed beyond the 180-day limit (19 CFR 174.11), making it untimely; C involves a resolved drawback claim with no dispute; and D concerns an error in flagging, not a CBP decision subject to protest.

October 2022, Q49. Given the following protest types concerning merchandise for which entry was filed within the last two years, select the answer that provides the correct amount of time in which the Center Director shall review the protest. • The Center Director has ____ from the date of filing to review a protest relating to the exclusion of merchandise. • The Center Director has ____ from the date of the mailing of the accelerated disposition request to review the protest. Answer selections for each protest type will be separated by a comma.

  1. A30 days, 30 days
  2. B30 days, 90 days
  3. C30 days, 1 year
  4. D90 days, 2 years
  5. E180 days, 180 days
Show the answer and explanation
Correct answer: A  · Authority: 19 CFR 174.21, 19 CFR 174.22

The correct answer is A because 19 CFR 174.21(b) explicitly mandates a 30-day review period for protests relating to the exclusion of merchandise, overriding the general 2-year rule in 174.21(a). For the accelerated disposition request, 19 CFR 174.22 requires the Center Director to act within 30 days from the mailing date, as this provision governs such cases. Other options incorrectly apply the 2-year or 90-day periods, which are not applicable here.

October 2024, Q57. Which of the below is a matter that could be subject to protest?

  1. ABecause of a broker clerical error, non-dutiable charges were not deducted when reporting the entered value on the entry summary. The entered value needs to be adjusted and a duty refund requested on the unliquidated entry summary.
  2. BCBP refused to allow amendment of a protest involving one entry 200 days after the underlying entry was liquidated.
  3. CCBP liquidated a drawback claim with a refund on a drawback claim where the accelerated payment was completed.
  4. DCBP denied a post-summary 19 USC 1520(d) claim under the United States-Peru Trade Promotion Agreement filed in the ACE Protest Module.
Show the answer and explanation
Correct answer: D  · Authority: 19 CFR 174.11; 19 CFR 174.11(b)(8)

The correct answer is D because 19 CFR 174.11(b)(8) explicitly states that the refusal to reliquidate an entry under 19 U.S.C. 1520(d) is subject to protest, which includes post-summary claims under trade agreements like the U.S.-Peru Trade Promotion Agreement. Option A involves a clerical error, which is generally protestable under 19 CFR 174.11(a), but the scenario describes an unliquidated entry, not a liquidated one, which may not meet the criteria for protest. Option B concerns a procedural refusal after the liquidation deadline, which is not directly addressed as a protestable matter in the cited authority. Option C involves a drawback claim that was liquidated with a refund, not a refusal to pay, which would fall under 19 CFR 174.11(b)(6) but is not applicable here.

October 2025, Q9. When a protest is filed on behalf of a principal by an agent, who is not an attorney at law or a customhouse broker or his authorized employee, what document must also be filed to demonstrate the agent is authorized to file protest?

  1. AArticles of incorporation
  2. BCertificate of authority
  3. CLetter of intent
  4. DPower of attorney
Show the answer and explanation
Correct answer: D  · Authority: 19 CFR 174.3(a)

The correct answer is D) Power of attorney, as required by 19 CFR 174.3(a), which mandates that any agent other than an attorney at law or customhouse broker must file a power of attorney to demonstrate authorization to act on the principal’s behalf. This document must explicitly authorize the agent to file the protest or grant unlimited authority. The other options are not mentioned in the cited authority: Articles of incorporation (A) pertain to corporate formation, a certificate of authority (B) is unrelated to protest filing, and a letter of intent (C) is a general expression of intent, not a legal authorization document.

October 2025, Q41. Importer Sunny Solar Panels filed an entry for a shipment that arrived in the Los Angeles/Long Beach seaport on March 1, 2020. Sunny Solar Panels filed an entry summary on March 3, 2020, and tendered all duties, taxes, and fees owed. The merchandise was released from U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) custody on March 3, 2020. CBP liquidated the entry on January 22, 2021. Upon reviewing the liquidation, Sunny Solar Panels realized that due to a clerical error they overpaid harbor maintenance fees. What is the deadline for Sunny Solar Panels to file a protest?

  1. AWithin 90 days of January 22, 2021
  2. BWithin 180 days of January 22, 2021
  3. CWithin 365 days of March 1, 2020
  4. DWithin 180 days of March 3, 2020
Show the answer and explanation
Correct answer: B  · Authority: 19 CFR 174.12(e)(1)

The correct answer is B because the protest deadline is determined by the date of liquidation, which was January 22, 2021. Under 19 CFR 174.12(e)(1), protests must be filed within 180 days of the date of liquidation for entries made on or after December 18, 2004. Since the liquidation occurred after this date, the 180-day rule applies. Option A incorrectly references the 90-day rule, which applies only to entries liquidated before December 18, 2004. Options C and D are irrelevant because the protest deadline is tied to the liquidation date, not the arrival or entry summary dates.

The exam is open book. Practise finding the section, not memorising it.

CBLEsim is free: every past-exam question CBP has released, the CFR and the HTSUS a tap away, timed mock exams, and tracking that sends you back to what you keep missing.

Start practising free

All CFR parts the exam tests · Browse by sitting