CBLEsim

Title 19 CFR · 24 exam questions

19 CFR Part 171: Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures

19 CFR Part 171, section by section, with every released customs broker license exam question in the CBLEsim bank that tests it. Drawn from 9 released sittings, April 2018 through October 2024.

Edition shown: the 2025 annual edition of Title 19, revised as of April 1, 2025. It is the edition the October 2026 customs broker exam is graded against, and it can differ from the regulation in force today. For the current official text see 19 CFR Part 171 on eCFR.

Sections of Part 171

Every section opens in place. A linked section has its own page, with the exam questions that turn on it.

§ 171.0Scope

This part contains provisions relating to petitions for relief from fines, forfeitures, and certain penalties incurred, and petitions for the restoration of proceeds from sale of seized and forfeited property. This part does not relate to petitions on claims for liquidated damages or penalties which are guaranteed by the conditions of the International Carrier Bond (see § 113.64 of this Chapter).

§ 171.1Petition for relief

(a) To whom addressed. Petitions for the remission or mitigation of a fine, penalty, or forfeiture incurred under any law administered by Customs must be addressed to the Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer designated in the notice of claim.

(b) Signature. For commercial violations, the petition for remission or mitigation must be signed by the petitioner, his attorney-at-law or a Customs broker. If the petitioner is a corporation, the petition may be signed by an officer or responsible supervisory official of the corporation, or a responsible employee representative of the corporation. Electronic signatures are acceptable. In non-commercial violations, a non-English speaking petitioner or petitioner who has a disability which may impede his ability to file a petition may enlist a family member or other representative to file a petition on his behalf. The deciding Customs officer may, in his or her discretion, require proof of representation before consideration of any petition.

(c) Form. The petition for remission or mitigation need not be in any particular form. Customs can require that the petition and any documents submitted in support of the petition be in English or be accompanied by an English translation. The petition must set forth the following:

(1) A description of the property involved (if a seizure);

(2) The date and place of the violation or seizure;

(3) The facts and circumstances relied upon by the petitioner to justify remission or mitigation; and

(4) If a seizure case, proof of a petitionable interest in the seized property.

(d) False statement in petition. A false statement contained in a petition may subject the petitioner to prosecution under the provisions of 18 U.S.C. 1001.

§ 171.2Filing a petition · full text and 9 exam questions

§ 171.3Oral presentations seeking relief

(a) For violation of section 592 or section 593A. If the penalty incurred is for a violation of section 592, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1592), or section 593A, Tariff Act of 1930, as added (19 U.S.C. 1593a), the person named in the notice, in addition to filing a petition, may make an oral presentation seeking relief in accordance with this paragraph.

(b) Other oral presentations. Oral presentations other than those provided in paragraph (a) of this section may be allowed in the discretion of any official of the Customs Service or Department of the Treasury authorized to act on a petition or supplemental petition.

§ 171.11Petitions acted on by Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer

(a) Remission or mitigation authority. Upon receipt of a petition for relief submitted pursuant to the provisions of section 618 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1618), or section 5321(c) of title 31, United States Code (31 U.S.C. 5321(c)), the Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer is empowered to remit or mitigate on such terms and conditions as, under law and in view of the circumstances, he or she deems appropriate in accordance with appropriate delegations of authority.

(b) When violation did not occur. Notwithstanding any other delegation of authority, the Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer is always empowered to cancel any claim when he or she definitely determines that the act or omission forming the basis of any claim of penalty or forfeiture did not occur.

(c) When violation is result of vessel in distress. The Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer may remit without payment any penalty which arises for violation of the coastwise laws if he or she is satisfied that the violation occurred as a direct result of an arrival of the transporting vessel in distress.

§ 171.12Petitions acted on at CBP Headquarters

Upon receipt of a petition for relief filed pursuant to the provisions of section 618 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1618), or section 5321(c) of title 31, United States Code (31 U.S.C. 5321(c)), involving fines, penalties, and forfeitures which are outside of his or her delegated authority, the Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer will refer that petition to the Chief, Penalties Branch, Regulations and Rulings, Office of International Trade, CBP Headquarters, who is empowered to remit or mitigate on such terms and conditions as, under law and in view of the circumstances, he or she deems appropriate.

§ 171.13Limitations on consideration of petitions

(a) Cases referred for institution of legal proceedings. No action will be taken on any petition after the case has been referred to the Department of Justice for institution of legal proceedings. The petition will be forwarded to the Department of Justice.

(b) Conveyance awarded for official use. No petition for remission of forfeiture of a seized conveyance which has been forfeited and retained for official use will be considered unless it is filed before final disposition of the property is made. This does not affect petitions for restoration of proceeds of sale filed pursuant to the provisions of section 613 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1613).

§ 171.14Headquarters advice

The advice of the Director, Border Security and Trade Compliance Division, Regulations and Rulings, Office of International Trade, CBP Headquarters, or his designee, may be sought in any case (except as provided in this section), without regard to delegated authority to act on a petition or offer, when a novel or complex issue concerning a ruling, policy, or procedure is presented concerning a CBP action(s) or potential CBP action(s) relating to seizures and forfeitures, penalties, or mitigating or remitting any claim. This section does not apply to actual duty loss tenders determined by CBP pursuant to § 162.74(c) of this Chapter relating to prior disclosure and to actual duty loss demands made under § 162.79b of this Chapter. The request for advice may be initiated by the alleged violator or any CBP officer, but must be submitted to the Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer. The Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer retains the authority to refuse to forward any request that fails to raise a qualifying issue and to seek legal advice from the appropriate Associate or Assistant Chief Counsel in any case.

§ 171.21Written decisions

If a petition for relief relates to a violation of sections 592, 593A or 641, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1592, 19 U.S.C. 1593a, or 19 U.S.C. 1641), the petitioner will be provided with a written statement setting forth the decision on the matter and the findings of fact and conclusions of law upon which the decision is based.

§ 171.22Decisions effective for limited time

A decision to mitigate a penalty or to remit a forfeiture upon condition that a stated amount is paid will be effective for not more than 60 days from the date of notice to the petitioner of such decision unless the decision itself prescribes a different effective period. If payment of the stated amount or arrangements for such payment are not made, or a supplemental petition is not filed in accordance with regulation, the full penalty or claim for forfeiture will be deemed applicable and will be enforced by promptly referring the matter, after required collection action, if appropriate, to the appropriate Office of the Chief Counsel for preparation for referral to the Department of Justice unless other action has been directed by the Commissioner of Customs.

§ 171.23Decisions not protestable

(a) Mitigation decision not subject to protest. Any decision to remit a forfeiture or mitigate a penalty is not a protestable decision as defined under the provisions of 19 U.S.C. 1514. Any payment made in compliance with any decision to remit a forfeiture or mitigate a penalty is not a charge or exaction and therefore is not a protestable action as defined under the provisions of 19 U.S.C. 1514.

(b) Payment of mitigated amount as accord and satisfaction. Payment of a mitigated amount in compliance with an administrative decision on a petition or supplemental petition for relief will be considered an election of administrative proceedings and full disposition of the case. Payment of a mitigated amount will act as an accord and satisfaction of the Government claim. Payment of a mitigated amount will never serve as a bar to filing a supplemental petition for relief.

§ 171.24Remission of forfeitures and payment of fees, costs or interest

Any seizure subject to forfeiture may be remitted or mitigated pursuant to the provisions of 19 U.S.C. 1618 or 31 U.S.C. 5321, as applicable. Any person who accepts a remission or mitigation decision will not be considered to have substantially prevailed in a civil forfeiture proceeding for purposes of collection of any fees, costs or interest from the Government.

§ 171.31Form of offers

Offers in compromise submitted pursuant to the provisions of section 617 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1617) must expressly state that they are being submitted in accordance with the provisions of that section. The amount of the offer must be deposited with Customs in accordance with the provisions of § 161.5 of this chapter.

§ 171.32Acceptance of offers in compromise

An offer in compromise will be considered accepted only when the offeror is so notified in writing. As a condition to accepting an offer in compromise, the offeror may be required to enter into any collateral agreement or to post any security which is deemed necessary for the protection of the interest of the United States.

§ 171.41Application of provisions for petitions for relief

The general provisions of subpart A of this part on filing and content of petitions for relief apply to petitions for restoration of proceeds of sale except insofar as modified by this subpart.

§ 171.42Time limit for filing petition for restoration

A petition for the restoration of proceeds of sale under section 613, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1613) must be filed within 3 months after the date of the sale.

§ 171.43Evidence required

In addition to such other evidence as may be required under the provisions of subpart A of this part, the petition for restoration of proceeds of sale under section 613, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1613), must show the interest of the petitioner in the property. The petition must be supported by satisfactory proof that the petitioner did not know of the seizure prior to the declaration or decree of forfeiture and was in such circumstances as prevented him from knowing of it.

§ 171.44Forfeited property authorized for official use

If forfeited property which is the subject of a claim under section 613, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1613) has been authorized for official use, retention or delivery will be regarded as the sale thereof for the purposes of section 613. The appropriation available to the receiving agency for the purchase, hire, operation, maintenance and repair of property of the kind so received is available for the granting of relief to the claimant and for the satisfaction of liens for freight, charges and contributions in general average that may have been filed.

§ 171.51Application and definitions

(a) Application. The following definitions, regulations, and criteria are designed to establish and implement procedures required by section 6079 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, Pub. L. 100-690, title VI (102 Stat. 4181). They are intended to supplement existing law and procedures relative to the forfeiture of property under the identified statutory authority. The provisions of these regulations do not affect the existing legal and equitable rights and remedies of those with an interest in property seized for forfeiture, nor do these provisions relieve interested parties from their existing obligations and responsibilities in pursuing their interests through such courses of action. These regulations are intended to reflect the intent of Congress to minimize the adverse impact occasioned by the prolonged detention of property subject to forfeiture due to violations of law involving possession of personal use quantities of controlled substances. The definition of personal use quantities of controlled substance as contained herein is intended to distinguish between those quantities small in amount which are generally considered to be possessed for personal consumption and not for distribution, and those larger quantities generally considered to be subject to distribution.

(b) Definitions. As used in this subpart, the following terms shall have the meanings specified:

(1) Appraised value. “Appraised value” has the meaning given in § 162.43(a) of this chapter.

(2) Commercial fishing industry vessel. “Commercial fishing industry vessel” means a vessel that:

(i) Commercially engages in the catching, taking, or harvesting of fish or an activity that can reasonably be expected to result in the catching, taking, or harvesting of fish;

(ii) Commercially prepares fish or fish products other than by gutting, decapitating, gilling, skinning, shucking, icing, freezing, or brine chilling; or

(iii) Commercially supplies, stores, refrigerates, or transports fish, fish products, or materials directly related to fishing or the preparation of fish to or from a fishing, fish processing, or fish tender vessel or fish processing facility.

(3) Controlled substance. “Controlled substance” has the meaning given in 21 U.S.C. 802.

(4) Normal and customary manner. “Normal and customary manner” means that inquiry suggested by particular facts and circumstances which would customarily be undertaken by a reasonably prudent individual in a like or similar situation. Actual knowledge of such facts and circumstances is unnecessary, and implied, imputed, or constructive knowledge is sufficient. An established norm, standard, or custom is persuasive but not conclusive or controlling in determining whether a petitioner acted in a normal and customary manner to ascertain how property would be used by another legally in possession of the property.

(5) Owner or interested party. “Owner or interested party” means one having a legal and possessory interest in the property seized for foreiture or one who was in legal possession of the property at the time of seizure and is entitled to legal possession at the time of granting the petition for expedited procedure. This includes a lienholder, to the extent of his interest in the property, whose claim is in writing (except for a maritime lien which need not be in writing), unless the collateral is in the possession of the secured party. The agreement securing such a lien must create or provide for a security interest in the collateral, describe the collateral and be signed by the debtor.

(6) Personal use quantities. “Personal use quantities” means possession of controlled substances in circumstances where there is no evidence of intent to distribute, or to facilitate the manufacturing, compounding, processing, delivering, importing or exporting of any controlled substance. A quantity of a controlled substance is presumed to be for personal use if the amounts possessed do not exceed the quantities set forth in paragraph (b)(6)(i) of this section if there is no evidence of illicit drug trafficking or distribution such as, but not limited to the factors set forth in paragraph (b)(6)(ii) of this section. The possession of a narcotic, a depressant, a stimulant, a hallucinogin or a cannabis-controlled substance will be considered in excess of personal use quantities if the dosage unit amount possessed provides the same or greater equivalent efficacy as described in paragraph (b)(6)(i) of this section.

(i) Quantities presumed to be for personal use unless evidence of illicit drug trafficking or distribution exists. (A) One gram of a mixture of substance containing a detectable amount of heroin;

(B) One gram of a mixture of substance containing a detectable amount of—

(1) Coca leaves, except coca leaves and extracts of coca leaves from which cocaine, ecgonine, and derivations of ecgonine or their salts have been removed;

(2) Cocaine, its salts, optional and geometric isomers, and salts of isomers;

(3) Ecgonine, its derivatives, their salts, isomers, and salts of isomers; or

(4) Any compound, mixture, or preparation which contains any quantity of any of the substances referred to in paragraphs (b)(6)(i)(B) (1) through (3) of this section;

(C) 1/10th gram of a mixture of substances described in paragraph (b)(6)(i)(B) of this section which contains cocaine base;

(D) 1/10th gram of mixture of substance containing a detectable amount of phencyclidine (PCP);

(E) 500 micrograms of a mixture of substance containing a detectable amount of lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD);

(F) One ounce of a mixture of substance containing a detectable amount of marihuana; or

(G) One gram of methamphetamine, its salts, isomers, and salts of its isomers, or one gram of a mixture of substances containing a detectable amount of methamphetamine, its salts, isomers, or salts of its isomers.

(ii) Evidence of possession for other than personal use. Quantities shall not be considered to be for personal use if sweepings are present or there is other evidence of possession for other than personal use such as:

(A) Evidence such as drug scales, drug distribution paraphernalia, drug records, drug packaging material, method of drug packaging, drug “cutting” agents and other equipment, that indicates an intent to process, package or distribute a controlled substance;

(B) Information from reliable sources indicating possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute;

(C) The arrest and/or conviction record of the person or persons in actual or constructive possession of the controlled substance for offenses under Federal, State or local law that indicates an intent to distribute a controlled substance;

(D) The controlled substance is related to large amounts of cash or any amount of prerecorded government funds;

(E) The controlled substance is possessed under circumstances that indicate such a controlled substance is a sample intended for distribution in anticipation of a transaction involving large quantities, or is part of a larger delivery; or

(F) Statements by the possessor, or otherwise attributable to the possessor, including statements of conspirators, that indicate possession with intent to distribute.

(7) Property. “Property” means property subject to forfeiture under 19 U.S.C. 1595a.

(8) Seizing agency. “Seizing agency” means the Federal agency which has seized the property or adopted the seizure of another agency, and has the responsibility for administratively forfeiting the property.

(9) Sworn to. “Sworn to” refers to the oath as provided by 28 U.S.C. 1746 or as notarized in accordance with state law.

§ 171.52Petition for expedited procedures in an administrative forfeiture proceeding

(a) Procedures for violations involving possession of controlled substance in personal use quantities. The usual procedures for petitions for relief when property is seized are set forth in subpart B of this part. However, where property is seized for administrative forfeiture pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1595a due to violations involving controlled substances in personal use quantities, a petition may be filed pursuant to paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section to seek expedited procedures for release of the property. A petition filed pursuant to this subpart shall also serve as a petition for relief filed under subpart B of this part. The petition may be filed by an owner or interested party.

(b) Commercial fishing industry vessels. Where a commercial fishing industry vessel proceeding to or from a fishing area or intermediate port of call or actually engaged in fishing operations is subject to seizure for administrative forfeiture for a violation of law involving controlled substances in personal use quantities, a summons to appear shall be issued in lieu of a physical seizure. The vessel shall report to the port designated in the summons no later than the date specified in the summons. When a commercial fishing industry vessel reports, the appropriate Customs officer shall, depending on the facts and circumstances, either issue another summons to appear at a time deemed appropriate, execute a constructive seizure agreement pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1605, or take physical custody of the vessel. When a summons to appear has been issued, the seizing agency may be authorized to institute administrative forfeiture as if the vessel had been physically seized. When a summons to appear has been issued, the owner or interested party may file a petition for expedited procedures pursuant to subsection (a); the provisions of subsection (a) and other provisions in this subpart relating to a petition for expedited release shall apply as if the vessel had been physically seized.

(c) Elements to be established in petition. (1) The petition for expedited procedures shall establish that:

(i) The petitioner has a valid, good faith interest in the seized property as owner or otherwise;

(ii) The petitioner reasonably attempted to ascertain the use of the property in a normal and customary manner; and

(iii) The petitioner did not know or consent to the illegal use of the property or, in the event that the petitioner knew or should have known of the illegal use, the petitioner did what reasonably could be expected to prevent the violation.

(2) In addition, the petitioner may submit evidence to establish that he has statutory rights or defenses such that he would prevail in a judicial proceeding on the issue of forfeiture.

(d) Manner of filing. A petition for expedited procedures must be filed in a timely manner to be considered by Customs. To be filed in a timely manner, the petition must be received by Customs within 20 days from the date the notice of seizure was mailed, or in the case of a commercial fishing industry vessel for which a summons to appear is issued, 20 days from the original date when the vessel is required to report. The petition must be sworn to by the petitioner and signed by the petitioner or his attorney at law. If the petitioner is a corporation, the petition may be sworn to by an officer or responsible supervisory employee thereof and signed by that individual or an attorney at law representing the corporation. Both the envelope and the request must be clearly marked “PETITION FOR EXPEDITED PROCEDURES.” The petition shall be addressed to the U.S. Customs Service and filed in triplicate with the Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer for the port where the property was seized, or for commercial fishing industry vessels, with the Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer for the port to which the vessel was required to report.

(e) Contents of petition. The petition shall include the following:

(1) A complete description of the property, including identification numbers, if any, and the date and place of the violation and seizure;

(2) A description of the petitioner's interest in the property, supported by the documentation, bills of sale, contracts, mortgages, or other satisfactory documentary evidence; and

(3) A statement of the facts and circumstances relied upon by the petitioner to justify expedited return of the seized property, supported by satisfactory evidence.

§ 171.53Ruling on petition for expedited procedures

(a) Final administrative determination. Upon receipt of a petition filed pursuant to § 171.52, Customs shall determine first whether a final administrative determination of the case can be made within 21 days of the seizure. If such a final administrative determination is made within 21 days, no further action need be taken under this subpart.

(b) Determination within 20 days. If no such final administrative determination is made within 21 days of the seizure, Customs shall within 20 days after the receipt of the petition make a determination as follows:

(1) If Customs determines that the factors listed in § 171.52(c) have been established, it shall terminate the administrative proceedings and release the property from seizure, or in the case of a commercial fishing industry vessel for which a summons has been issued, but not yet answered, dismiss the summons. The property shall not be returned if it is evidence of a violation of law.

(2) If Customs determines that the factors listed in § 171.52(c) have not been established, it shall proceed with the administrative forfeiture.

§ 171.54Substitute res in an administrative forfeiture action

(a) Substitute res. Where property is seized for administrative forfeiture for a violation involving controlled substances in personal use quantities, the owner or interested party may offer to post an amount equal to the appraised value of the property (the res) to obtain release of the property. The offer, which may be tendered at any time subsequent to seizure and up until the completion of administrative forfeiture proceedings, must be in the form of cash, irrevocable letter of credit, certified funds such as a certified check, traveler's check(s), or money order made payable to U.S. Customs. Unless the property is evidence of a violation of law or has other characteristics that particularly suit it for use in illegal activities, it will be released to the owner or interested party subsequent to tender of the substitute res.

(b) Forfeiture of res. If a substitute res is posted and it is determined that the property should be administratively forfeited, the res will be forfeited in lieu of the property.

§ 171.55Notice provisions

(a) Special notice provision. At the time of seizure of property defined in § 171.51, written notice must be provided to the possessor of the property regarding applicable statutes and Federal regulations including the procedures established for the filing of a petition for expedited procedures as set forth in section 6079 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988 and implementing regulations.

(b) Notice provision. The notice as required by section 1607 of Title 19, United States Code and applicable regulations shall be made at the earliest practicable opportunity after determining ownership of, or interest in, the seized property and shall include a statement of the applicable law under which the property is seized and a statement of the circumstances of the seizure sufficiently precise to enable an owner or interested party to identify the date, place and use or acquisition which makes the property subject to forfeiture.

§ 171.61Time and place of filing

If the petitioner is not satisfied with a decision of the deciding official on an original petition for relief, a supplemental petition may be filed with the Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer having jurisdiction in the port where the violation occurred. Such supplemental petition must be filed within 60 days from the date of notice to the petitioner of the decision from which further relief is requested or within 60 days following an administrative or judicial decision with respect to the entries involved in a penalty case which reduces the loss of duties upon which the mitigated penalty amount was based (whichever is later) unless another time to file such a supplemental petition is prescribed in the decision. The filing of a supplemental petition may be subject to the conditions prescribed in § 171.64 of this part. A supplemental petition may be filed whether or not the mitigated penalty or forfeiture remission amount designated in the decision on the original petition is paid.

§ 171.62Supplemental petition decision authority

(a) Decisions of Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officers. Supplemental petitions filed on cases where the original decision was made by the Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer, will be initially reviewed by that official. The Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer may choose to grant more relief and issue a decision indicating that additional relief to the petitioner. If the petitioner is dissatisfied with the further relief granted or if the Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer decides to grant no further relief, the supplemental petition will be forwarded to a designated Headquarters official assigned to a field location for review and decision, except that supplemental petitions filed in cases involving violations of 19 U.S.C. 1641 where the amount of the penalty assessed exceeds $10,000 will be forwarded to the Chief, Penalties Branch, Border Security and Trade Compliance Division, Regulations and Rulings, Office of International Trade.

(b) Decisions of CBP Headquarters. Supplemental petitions filed on cases where the original decision was made by the Chief, Penalties Branch, Regulations and Rulings, Office of International Trade, CBP Headquarters, will be forwarded to the Director, Border Security and Trade Compliance Division, CBP Headquarters, for review and decision.

§ 171.64Waiver of statute of limitations

The deciding Customs official always reserves the right to require a waiver of the statute of limitations executed by the claimants to the property or charged party or parties as a condition precedent before accepting a supplemental petition in any case in which less than one year remains before the statute will be available as a defense to all or part of that case.

Other exam questions from Part 171

April 2018, Q67. A false statement contained in a petition may subject the petitioner to prosecution under the provisions of:

  1. A18 U.S.C. 1001
  2. B19 U.S.C. 1497
  3. C19 U.S.C. 1592
  4. D19 U.S.C. 1641
  5. E19 U.S.C. 1593a
Show the answer and explanation
Correct answer: A  · Authority: 19 CFR 171.1(d)

The correct answer is A) 18 U.S.C. 1001 because 19 CFR 171.1(d) explicitly states that a false statement in a petition for remission or mitigation may subject the petitioner to prosecution under this statute, which criminalizes false statements to the federal government. The other options are Title 19 provisions that govern customs procedures, penalties, or administrative remedies, not criminal prosecution for false statements. For example, 19 U.S.C. 1497, 1592, 1593a, and 1641 address matters like penalties, forfeiture, or administrative enforcement, but none criminalize false statements in petitions.

April 2018, Q68. Blue-sky customs broker is filing a petition for the restoration of sale under section 613, Tariff Act of 1920, as amended. Blue-sky’s petition must be filed:

  1. Awithin 60 days when Blue-sky is notified in writing
  2. Bwithin 120 days when Blue-sky is notified in writing
  3. Cwithin 1 month after the date of sale
  4. Dwithin 3 months after the date of sale
  5. Eno time limit is required.
Show the answer and explanation
Correct answer: D  · Authority: 19 CFR 171.42

The correct answer is D because 19 CFR 171.42 explicitly states that a petition for restoration must be filed within 3 months after the date of sale, regardless of notification timing. Options A and B incorrectly reference written notification and 60/120-day periods, which are not mentioned in the regulation. Option C’s 1-month deadline is shorter than the 3-month requirement, and E is incorrect because the regulation imposes a clear time limit. The authority directly ties the filing period to the sale date, not other conditions.

April 2022, Q16. Petitions for the remission or mitigation of a fine, penalty, or forfeiture incurred under any law administered by Customs must be addressed to the Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer designated in the notice of claim. In addition, which of the following must the petition for remission or mitigation contain?

  1. ASupport documents in any language without English translation
  2. BThe name of the CBP Officer involved in the incident
  3. CThe date and place of the violation or seizure
  4. DTriplicate copies unless filed electronically
  5. ECertification by a notary public
Show the answer and explanation
Correct answer: C  · Authority: 19 CFR 171.1(c)(2)

The correct answer is C because 19 CFR 171.1(c)(2) explicitly requires the petition to include the date and place of the violation or seizure. This is a mandatory element listed in the regulation. Option A is incorrect because the regulation mandates that support documents be in English or accompanied by an English translation, not in any language without translation. Option B is not required as the regulation does not mention the need to include the name of the CBP Officer involved. Option D is incorrect because the regulation does not specify the number of copies required, only that electronic signatures are acceptable. Option E is not required as the regulation does not mention notary certification.

October 2018, Q32. A petition for restoration of proceeds of sale under section 613, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1613) must be filed within ______ after the date of sale.

  1. AOne month
  2. BTwo months
  3. CThree months
  4. DSix months
  5. EOne year
Show the answer and explanation
Correct answer: C  · Authority: 19 CFR 171.42

The correct answer is C because 19 CFR 171.42 explicitly states that the petition must be filed within three months after the sale date. Options A, B, D, and E are incorrect because they do not align with the specific timeframe mandated by the cited regulation, which leaves no room for alternative interpretations. The authority directly governs this requirement, making any other duration invalid under the law.

October 2019, Q67. Assuming that a protest is timely filed with CBP, which statement of the following options is a valid claim for a 514 Protest concerning an entry for consumption filed on July 1, 2019?

  1. AThe contest of the duty rate calculated for the country-wide rate in an anti-dumping duty order issued by the Department of Commerce, which is generally applicable to that entry
  2. BThe contest of a denied request for reliquidation of under 19 U.S.C. § 1520(c)
  3. CThe contest of the fee rate established for the USDA Agriculture Marketing Service fee, which is generally applicable to that entry
  4. DThe contest of a denied petition to reliquidate an entry filed pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 1520(d)
  5. EA request to change the importer of record, which was provided on the entry documentation for an entry for consumption, from the consignee to the owner of the merchandise
Show the answer and explanation
Correct answer: D  · Authority: 19 CFR 171.11(b)(8), 19 CFR 141.20

The correct answer is D because 19 U.S.C. § 1520(d) explicitly authorizes protests concerning denied petitions to reliquidate entries, which aligns with the scope of a 514 Protest under 19 CFR 171.11(b)(8). The other options are invalid: A involves anti-dumping duties, which are governed by separate administrative procedures (not protestable under 514); B refers to 19 U.S.C. § 1520(c), which pertains to different reliquidation grounds not covered by 514; C involves a USDA fee, which is not a duty or penalty subject to protest under 19 CFR 141.20; and E concerns a procedural correction (importer of record), which is not a protestable claim under 514.

October 2020 (AM), Q38. Petitions for the remission or mitigation of a fine, penalty, or forfeiture incurred under any law administered by Customs must be addressed to the Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer designated in the notice of claim. In addition, the petition for remission or mitigation must contain which of the following:

  1. ABe in the specific format stipulated
  2. BThe name of the CBP Officer involved in the incident
  3. CThe date and place of the violation or seizure
  4. DTriplicate filing unless filed electronically
  5. ECertification by a notary public
Show the answer and explanation
Correct answer: C  · Authority: 19 CFR 171.1(c)(2)

The correct answer is C because 19 CFR 171.1(c)(2) explicitly requires the petition to include the date and place of the violation or seizure. The other options are not mandated by the cited authority: A is incorrect because the regulation states the petition need not be in any particular form; B is not required as the name of the CBP officer is not mentioned; D is unsupported since the rule does not address triplicate filings; and E is not required as notarization is not specified in the text.

October 2020 (AM), Q39. Supplemental petitions for relief from penalties MUST be filed within what period of time?

  1. AWithin 30 days of the time of mailing of the notice of seizure
  2. BWithin 30 days from the date of the notice of decision from which further relief is requested
  3. CWithin 60 days of the notice of decision from which further relief is requested unless another time to file such a supplemental petition is prescribed in the decision
  4. DWithin 60 days from the date of entry
  5. EWithin 180 days from the mailing of the notice of penalty incurred
Show the answer and explanation
Correct answer: C  · Authority: 19 CFR 171.61

The correct answer is C because 19 CFR 171.61 explicitly states that a supplemental petition must be filed within 60 days from the date of notice of the decision from which further relief is requested, or within 60 days following a related administrative or judicial decision (whichever is later), unless the decision prescribes a different time. Option A is incorrect because the 30-day period applies to notices of seizure, not supplemental petitions. Option B is incorrect because it cites a 30-day period, which contradicts the 60-day rule in the regulation. Option D is incorrect because the 60-day period starts from the notice of decision, not the date of entry. Option E is incorrect because the 180-day period is not mentioned in the cited text.

October 2021, Q12. What is the time limit after the date of sale for filing a petition for restoration of proceeds of sale?

  1. A1 month
  2. B2 months
  3. C3 months
  4. D5 months
  5. E8 months
Show the answer and explanation
Correct answer: C  · Authority: 19 CFR 171.42

The correct answer is C) 3 months because 19 CFR 171.42 explicitly requires a petition for restoration of proceeds of sale to be filed within 3 months after the sale date. Options A and B are incorrect because they specify shorter periods not mentioned in the regulation. Options D and E are incorrect because they exceed the 3-month limit, which the authority does not extend. The rule is unambiguous and does not allow for exceptions or longer periods.

October 2021, Q13. Supplemental petitions filed in cases involving violations of 19 USC 1641 where the amount of the penalty assessed exceeds $10,000 will be forwarded to_______________.

  1. ALocal Fines, Penalties and Forfeiture Officer, Office of Field Operations
  2. BBroker Management Branch, Trade Policy and Programs, Office of Trade
  3. CFP&F Branch, Office of Field Operations, HQ
  4. DImport Analysis Branch, Center of Excellence and Expertise, Office of Field Operations
  5. EChief, Penalties Branch, Border Security and Trade Compliance Division, Regulations and Rulings, Office of International Trade
Show the answer and explanation
Correct answer: E  · Authority: 19 CFR 171.62

The correct answer is E because 19 CFR 171.62(a) explicitly states that supplemental petitions in cases involving violations of 19 U.S.C. 1641 with penalties exceeding 10,000 are forwarded to the Chief, Penalties Branch, Border Security and Trade Compliance Division, Regulations and Rulings, Office of International Trade. Other options, such as A (local Fines, Penalties officer) or C (FP&F Branch), apply to different stages or amounts under the same regulation, but E is the designated authority for penalties over 10,000. The text does not mention the other branches in this specific context.

October 2022, Q28. ABC Customs Brokers (ABC) received a penalty notice from the Fines, Penalties and Forfeitures Officer (FPFO) in Chicago, Illinois. The penalty notice indicated that the penalty amount was $30,000.00 under 19 USC 1641. ABC filed a petition in accordance with 19 CFR 111.93, which was denied by the FPFO in Chicago. ABC filed a supplemental petition in accordance with 19 CFR 111.95 with the FPFO in Chicago, which the FPFO also intends to deny. To whom will the supplemental petition be forwarded?

  1. ACenter Director, Base Metals Center of Excellence and Expertise, Chicago Office of Field Operations
  2. BBranch Chief, Broker Management Branch, Commercial Operations, Revenue and Entry Division, Trade Policy and Programs, Office of Trade
  3. CChief, Civil Enforcement Division, Trade Remedy Law Enforcement Directorate, Office of Trade
  4. DAssociate Chief Counsel, Chicago Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
  5. EChief, Penalties Branch, Border Security and Trade Compliance Division, Regulations and Rulings, Office of International Trade
Show the answer and explanation
Correct answer: E  · Authority: 19 CFR 171.62(a)

The correct answer is E because 19 CFR 171.62(a) explicitly states that supplemental petitions involving violations of 19 U.S.C. 1641 with penalties exceeding 10,000 are forwarded to the Chief, Penalties Branch, Border Security and Trade Compliance Division, Regulations and Rulings, Office of International Trade. The 30,000 penalty in this case meets the threshold, triggering this provision. Other options are incorrect because they reference roles or divisions not specified in 19 CFR 171.62(a) for this particular scenario.

October 2022, Q29. A broker received a penalty notice from a Fines, Penalties and Forfeitures Officer (FPFO). The broker filed a petition in accordance with 19 CFR 111.93, which was denied by the FPFO. The broker plans to file a supplemental petition in accordance with 19 CFR 111.95 with the FPFO. The date of denial of the petition was October 3, 2022. What is the last date on which the broker can file the supplemental petition?

  1. AWednesday, November 2, 2022
  2. BFriday, December 2, 2022
  3. CMonday, January 2, 2023
  4. DTuesday January 31, 2023
  5. EMonday, April 3, 2023
Show the answer and explanation
Correct answer: B  · Authority: 19 CFR 171.61

The correct answer is B because the 60-day period for filing a supplemental petition begins on the date of denial (October 3, 2022). Adding 60 days to this date results in December 2, 2022, which aligns with the authority in 19 CFR 171.61. Other options are incorrect because they either miscalculate the 60-day period or extend beyond it, as the rule explicitly limits the filing window to 60 days from the notice of the decision.

October 2023, Q65. Which of the following statements is FALSE with respect to petitions for relief submitted under section 618 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended?

  1. AThe Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer receiving the petition is empowered to remit a forfeiture or mitigate a penalty in accordance with the Customs regulations.
  2. BA decision to mitigate the penalty or forfeiture conditioned upon payment of a stated amount will be effective for not more than 60 days from the date of the notice unless the decision prescribes a different effective period.
  3. CPayment of a mitigated amount based upon the administrative decision of the Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer constitutes an accord and satisfaction of the Government’s claim.
  4. DThe Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer’s decision to remit a forfeiture or mitigate a penalty is a protestable decision under 19 USC 1514.
Show the answer and explanation
Correct answer: D  · Authority: 19 CFR Part 171

The correct answer is D because 19 CFR Part 171 governs petitions for relief under section 618 and explicitly states that such petitions are not subject to protest procedures under 19 USC 1514. Protests are distinct administrative remedies for customs decisions, whereas section 618 petitions are handled through a separate regulatory framework. Options A, B, and C are accurate because they align with the authority granted to the Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer under 19 CFR Part 171, including remitting forfeitures, setting time limits for mitigation decisions, and recognizing mitigated payments as accord and satisfaction.

October 2023, Q69. Which of the following is TRUE regarding a petition for mitigation or remission?

  1. AIt must be in the specific format stipulated by regulation.
  2. BIt must state the date and place of the violation or seizure.
  3. CIt must be filed in triplicate unless filed electronically.
  4. DIt must be certified by a notary public.
Show the answer and explanation
Correct answer: B  · Authority: 19 CFR 171.1

The correct answer is B because 19 CFR 171.1(c)(2) explicitly requires the petition to include the "date and place of the violation or seizure." This is a mandatory element of the petition. Option A is incorrect because 19 CFR 171.1(c) states the petition "need not be in any particular form," so no specific format is required. Option C is incorrect because the regulation does not mention triplicate filings or electronic filing requirements beyond accepting electronic signatures. Option D is incorrect because 19 CFR 171.1(b) only requires a signature from the petitioner or representative, with no mention of notarization.

October 2024, Q12. Sam Sly's customs broker license was revoked by operation of law for failure to file a triennial status report and pay the fee. Sam thought that his employer ABC Brokerage (ABC) filed his report and paid the fee on his behalf, so he ignored the warning letter from CBP. In addition to his work at ABC, Sam completes freelance jobs classifying merchandise and filling out entry documents, but not filing them with CBP, for clients he obtains from a website that brings service providers together with businesses who buy freelance services. CBP discovers Sam's side business, determines that Sam is advertising publicly that he is a licensed customs broker, and discovers that he has conducted customs business for five importers of commercial goods after his license was revoked. CBP sends a penalty notice to Sam for conducting customs business without a license for $10,000.00. This is Sam's first penalty, and he has the ability to pay the fine, but he has requested mitigation claiming that he did not know his license was revoked. Based upon the guidelines in Appendix C to 19 CFR Part 171, will CBP mitigate and, if so, to what amount?

  1. AYes, CBP will mitigate to $250.00.
  2. BYes, CBP will mitigate to $1,000.00.
  3. CNo, CBP will not mitigate the penalty.
  4. DNo, CBP will not mitigate and will raise the penalty to $30,000.00 because there were five violations.
Show the answer and explanation
Correct answer: C  · Authority: 19 CFR Part 171, Appendix C II. E(5), II F, II G

The correct answer is C because Appendix C to 19 CFR Part 171, II.E(5), II.F, and II.G specify that mitigation is not available for violations involving willful or negligent conduct, such as failing to maintain a valid license or continuing to engage in customs business after revocation. Sam’s failure to file his triennial report and his ongoing freelance customs work after license revocation constitute willful negligence, disqualifying him from mitigation. Options A and B incorrectly assume mitigation is possible, but the authority explicitly excludes such scenarios. Option D is incorrect because the penalty amount is not raised but remains at 10,000, as the question focuses on mitigation, not escalation.

October 2024, Q15. What is the maximum amount that a broker can be penalized for a violation or violations of 19 USC 1641 in one penalty notice?

  1. A$25,000.00
  2. B$30,000.00
  3. C$50,000.00
  4. D$100,000.00
Show the answer and explanation
Correct answer: B  · Authority: 19 CFR Part 171 Appendix C XII

The cap is $30,000, answer B. Under 19 U.S.C. 1641(d)(2)(A), and the penalty guidelines in Appendix C to 19 CFR Part 171, $30,000 is the maximum monetary penalty that may be assessed against a broker in a single penalty notice for a violation or violations of 19 U.S.C. 1641. The figure is a ceiling on the notice as a whole, not a per-violation amount that several violations could stack beyond, which is what makes $50,000 and $100,000 wrong; $25,000 is below the statutory maximum.

The exam is open book. Practise finding the section, not memorising it.

CBLEsim is free: every past-exam question CBP has released, the CFR and the HTSUS a tap away, timed mock exams, and tracking that sends you back to what you keep missing.

Start practising free

All CFR parts the exam tests · Browse by sitting