Title 19 CFR · 39 exam questions
19 CFR Part 134: Country of Origin Marking
19 CFR Part 134, section by section, with every released customs broker license exam question in the CBLEsim bank that tests it. Drawn from 15 released sittings, April 2018 through October 2024.
Edition shown: the 2025 annual edition of Title 19, revised as of April 1, 2025. It is the edition the October 2026 customs broker exam is graded against, and it can differ from the regulation in force today. For the current official text see 19 CFR Part 134 on eCFR.
Sections of Part 134
Every section opens in place. A linked section has its own page, with the exam questions that turn on it.
§ 134.0Scope
This part sets forth regulations implementing the country of origin marking requirements and exceptions of section 304 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1304), together with certain marking provisions of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (19 U.S.C. 1202). The consequences and procedures to be followed when articles are not legally marked are set forth in this part. The consequences and procedures to be followed when articles are falsely marked are set forth in § 11.13 of this chapter. Special marking and labeling requirements are covered elsewhere. Provisions regarding the review and appeal rights of exporters and producers resulting from adverse North American Free Trade Agreement marking decisions are contained in subpart J of part 181 of this chapter.
§ 134.1Definitions
When used in this part, the following terms shall have the meaning indicated:
(a) Country. “Country” means the political entity known as a nation. Colonies, possessions, or protectorates outside the boundaries of the mother country are considered separate countries.
(b) Country of origin. “Country of origin” means the country of manufacture, production, or growth of any article of foreign origin entering the United States. Further work or material added to an article in another country must effect a substantial transformation in order to render such other country the “country of origin” within the meaning of this part; however, for a good of a NAFTA or USMCA country, the marking rules set forth in part 102 of this chapter (hereinafter referred to as the part 102 Rules) will determine the country of origin.
(c) Foreign origin. “Foreign origin” refers to a country of origin other than the United States, as defined in paragraph (e) of this section, or its possessions and territories.
(d) Ultimate purchaser. The “ultimate purchaser” is generally the last person in the United States who will receive the article in the form in which it was imported; however, for a good of a NAFTA or USMCA country, the “ultimate purchaser” is the last person in the United States who purchases the good in the form in which it was imported. It is not feasible to state who will be the “ultimate purchaser” in every circumstance. The following examples may be helpful:
(1) If an imported article will be used in manufacture, the manufacturer may be the “ultimate purchaser” if he subjects the imported article to a process which results in a substantial transformation of the article, even though the process may not result in a new or different article, or for a good of a NAFTA or USMCA country, a process which results in one of the changes prescribed in the part 102 Rules as effecting a change in the article's country of origin.
(2) If the manufacturing process is merely a minor one which leaves the identity of the imported article intact, the consumer or user of the article, who obtains the article after the processing, will be regarded as the “ultimate purchaser.” With respect to a good of a NAFTA or USMCA country, if the manufacturing process does not result in one of the changes prescribed in the part 102 Rules as effecting a change in the article's country of origin, the consumer who purchases the article after processing will be regarded as the ultimate purchaser.
(3) If an article is to be sold at retail in its imported form, the purchaser at retail is the “ultimate purchaser.”
(4) If the imported article is distributed as a gift the recipient is the “ultimate purchaser”, unless the good is a good of a NAFTA or USMCA country. In that case, the purchaser of the gift is the ultimate purchaser.
(e) United States. “United States” includes all territories and possessions of the United States, except the Virgin Islands, American Samoa, Wake Island, Midway Islands, Kingman Reef, Johnston Island, and the island of Guam.
(f) Customs territory of the United States. “Customs territory of the United States,” as used in this chapter includes the States, the District of Columbia, and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.
(g) Good of a NAFTA or USMCA country. A “good of a NAFTA or USMCA country” is an article for which the country of origin is Canada, Mexico or the United States as determined under the part 102 Rules.
(h) NAFTA. “NAFTA” means the North American Free Trade Agreement entered into by the United States, Canada and Mexico on August 13, 1992. NAFTA is not applicable to goods entered for consumption, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after July 1, 2020.
(i) NAFTA or USMCA country. “NAFTA or USMCA country” means the territory of the United States, Canada or Mexico, as defined in Annex 201.1 of NAFTA and Chapter 1, Section C of the USMCA.
(j) Part 102 Rules. “Part 102 Rules” are the rules promulgated for purposes of determining whether a good is a good of a NAFTA country, as set forth in part 102 of this chapter. The rules also apply to determine the country of origin for marking purposes for goods imported under the USMCA.
(k) Conspicuous. “Conspicuous” means capable of being easily seen with normal handling of the article or container.
(l) USMCA. “USMCA” means the Agreement Between the United States of America, the United Mexican States, and Canada (USMCA), entered into force by the United States, Canada and Mexico on July 1, 2020.
§ 134.2Additional duties · full text and 7 exam questions
§ 134.3Delivery withheld until marked and redelivery ordered
(a) Any imported article (or its container) held in CBP custody for inspection, examination, or appraisement will not be delivered until marked with its country of origin, or until estimated duties payable under 19 U.S.C. 1304(f), or adequate security for those duties (see § 134.53(a)(2)), are deposited.
(b) An authorized CBP official may demand redelivery to CBP custody of any article (or its container) previously released which is found to be not marked legally with its country of origin for the purpose of requiring the article (or its container) to be properly marked. A demand for redelivery will be made, as required under § 141.113(a) of this chapter, not later than 30 days after—
(1) The date of entry, in the case of merchandise examined in public stores and places of arrival, such as docks, wharfs, or piers; or
(2) The date of examination, in the case of merchandise examined at the importer's premises or such other appropriate places as determined by the port director.
(c) Nothing in this part shall be construed as excepting any article (or its container) from the particular requirements of marking provided for in any other provision of law.
§ 134.4Penalties for removal, defacement, or alteration of marking
Any intentional removal, defacement, destruction, or alteration of a marking of the country of origin required by section 304, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1304), and this part in order to conceal this information may result in criminal penalties of up to $5,000 and/or imprisonment for 1 year, as provided in 19 U.S.C. 1304(h).
§ 134.11Country of origin marking required
Unless excepted by law, section 304, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1304), requires that every article of foreign origin (or its container) imported into the United States shall be marked in a conspicuous place as legibly, indelibly, and permanently as the nature of the article (or container) will permit, in such manner as to indicate to an ultimate purchaser in the United States the English name of the country of origin of the article, at the time of importation into the Customs territory of the United States. Containers of articles excepted from marking shall be marked with the name of the country of origin of the article unless the container is also excepted from marking.
§ 134.12Foreign articles reshipped from a U.S. possession
Articles of foreign origin imported into any possession of the United States outside its Customs territory and reshipped to the United States are subject to all marking requirements applicable to like articles of foreign origin imported directly from a foreign country to the United States.
§ 134.13Imported articles repacked or manipulated
(a) Marking requirement. An article within the provisions of this section shall be marked with the name of the country of origin at the time the article is withdrawn for consumption unless the article and its container are exempted from marking under provisions of subpart D of this part at the time of importation.
(b) Applicability. The provisions of this section are applicable to the following articles:
(1) Articles repacked in a bonded warehouse under § 19.8 of this chapter;
(2) Articles manipulated under section 562, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1562), and § 19.11 of this chapter;
(3) Articles manipulated, but not manufactured, in a foreign-trade zone under § 146.32 of this chapter.
§ 134.14Articles usually combined
(a) Articles combined before delivery to purchaser. When an imported article is of a kind which is usually combined with another article after importation but before delivery to an ultimate purchaser and the name indicating the country of origin of the article appears in a place on the article so that the name will be visible after such combining, the marking shall include, in addition to the name of the country of origin, words or symbols which shall clearly show that the origin indicated is that of the imported article only and not that of any other article with which the imported article may be combined after importation.
(b) Example. Labels and similar articles so marked that the name of the country of origin of the label or article is visible after it is affixed to another article in this country shall be marked with additional descriptive words such as “Label made (or printed) in (name of country)” or words of similar meaning. See subpart C of this part for marking of bottles, drums, or other containers.
(c) Applicability. This section shall not apply to articles of a kind which are ordinarily so substantially changed in the United States that the articles in their changed condition become products of the United States. An article excepted from marking under subpart D of this part is not within the scope of section 304(a)(2), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1304(a)(2)), and is not subject to the requirements of this section.
§ 134.21Special marking
This subpart includes only country of origin marking requirements and exceptions under section 304(b), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1304(b)), for containers or holders. Special marking may be required by the Internal Revenue Service on alcoholic beverage bottles and other requirements may be imposed by reason of the nature of the contents by other Government agencies.
§ 134.22General rules for marking of containers or holders
(a) Contents excepted from marking. When an article is excepted from the marking requirements by subpart D of this part, the outermost container or holder in which the article ordinarily reaches the ultimate purchaser shall be marked to indicate the country of origin of the article whether or not the article is marked to indicate its country of origin.
(b) Containers or holders treated as imported articles. Containers or holders for imported merchandise which are subject to treatment as imported articles under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (19 U.S.C. 1202), shall be marked to indicate clearly the country of their own origin in addition to any marking which may be required to show the country of origin of their contents; however, no marking is required for any good of a NAFTA or USMCA country which is a usual container.
(c) Containers or holders bearing a U.S. address. Containers or holders of imported merchandise bearing the name and address of an importer, distributor, or other person or company in the United States shall be marked in close proximity to the U.S. address to indicate clearly the country of origin of the contents with a marking such as “Contents made in France” or “Contents Product of Spain.”
(d) Usual containers—(1) “Usual container” defined. For purposes of this subpart, a usual container means the container in which a good will ordinarily reach its ultimate purchaser. Containers which are not included in the price of the goods with which they are sold, or which impart the essential character to the whole, or which have significant uses, or lasting value independent of the contents, will generally not be regarded as usual containers. However, the fact that a container is sturdy and capable of repeated use with its contents does not preclude it from being considered a usual container so long as it is the type of container in which its contents are ordinarily sold. A usual container may be any type of container, including one which is specially shaped or fitted to contain a specific good or set of goods such as a camera case or an eyeglass case, or packing, storage and transportation materials.
(2) A good of a NAFTA or USMCA country which is a usual container. A good of a NAFTA or USMCA country which is a usual container, whether or not disposable and whether or not imported empty or filled, is not required to be marked with its own country of origin. If imported empty, the importer must be able to provide satisfactory evidence to Customs at the time of importation that it will be used only as a usual container (that it is to be filled with goods after importation and that such container is of a type in which these goods ordinarily reach the ultimate purchaser).
(e) Exceptions. Containers or holders of imported articles are not required to be marked if:
(1) Excepted articles. They are containers or holders of articles within the exceptions set forth in paragraph (f), (g), or (h) in § 134.32 or they are containers of a good of a NAFTA or USMCA country within the exceptions set forth in paragraph (e), (f), (g), (h), (i), (p) or (q) of § 134.32.
(2) Excepted containers or holders. The container or holder itself is within an exception set forth in subpart D of this part.
(3) To be filled by the importer. The container or holder is within the exception set forth in § 134.24(c).
§ 134.23Containers or holders designed for or capable of reuse
(a) Usual and ordinary reusable containers or holders. Except for goods of a NAFTA or USMCA country which are usual containers, containers or holders designed for or capable of reuse after the contents have been consumed, whether imported full or empty, must be individually marked to indicate the country of their own origin with a marking such as, “Container Made in (name of country).” Examples of the containers or holders contemplated are heavy duty steel drums, tanks, and other similar shipping, storage, transportation containers or holders capable of reuse. These containers or holders are subject to the treatment specified in General Rule of Interpretation 5(b), Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (19 U.S.C. 1202).
(b) Other reusable containers or holders. Containers or holders which give the whole importation its essential character, as described in General Rule of Interpretation 5(a) (19 U.S.C. 1202), must be individually marked to clearly indicate their own origin with a marking such as, “Container made in (name of country).” Examples of the containers contemplated are mustard jars reusable as beer mugs; shaving soap containers reusable as shaving mugs; fancy cologne bottles reusable as flower vases, and other containers which have a lasting value or decorative use.
§ 134.24Containers or holders not designed for or capable of reuse
(a) Containers ordinarily discarded after use. Disposable containers or holders subject to the provisions of this section are the usual ordinary types of containers or holders, including cans, bottles, paper or polyethylene bags, paperboard boxes, and similar containers or holders which are ordinarily discarded after the contents have been consumed.
(b) Imported empty. Disposable containers or holders imported for distribution or sale are subject to treatment as imported articles in accordance with the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (19 U.S.C. 1202), and shall be marked to indicate clearly the country of their own origin. However, when the containers are packed and sold in multiple units (dozens, gross, etc.), this requirement ordinarily may be met by marking the outermost container which reaches the ultimate purchaser.
(c) Imported to be filled—(1) If unmarked. When disposable containers or holders or usual containers which are goods of a NAFTA or USMCA country are imported by persons or firms who fill or package them with various products which they sell, these persons or firms are the “ultimate purchasers” of these containers or holders or usual containers which are goods of a NAFTA or USMCA country and they may be excepted from individual marking pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1304(a)(3)(D). The outside wrappings or packages containing the containers shall be clearly marked to indicate the country of origin.
(2) If marked. If the disposable containers or holders or the usual containers which are goods of a NAFTA or USMCA country are marked with the country of origin at the time of importation and the marking will be visible after they are filled, the marking shall clearly indicate that the container only and not the contents were made in the named country. For example, bottles, drums, or other containers imported empty, to be filled in the United States, shall be marked with such words as “Bottle (or container) made in (name of country).”
(d) Imported full—(1) When contents are excepted from marking. Usual disposable containers in use as such at the time of importation shall not be required to be marked to show the country of their own origin, but shall be marked to indicate the origin of their contents regardless of the fact that the contents are excepted from marking requirements; however, such marking is not required if the contents are excepted from marking requirements under paragraph (f), (g), or (h) of § 134.32 or, in the case of a good of a NAFTA or USMCA country, under paragraph (e), (f), (g), (h), (i), (p) or (q) of that section.
(2) Sealed containers or holders. Disposable containers or holders of imported merchandise, which are sold without normally being opened by the ultimate purchaser (e.g., individually wrapped soap bars or tennis balls in a vacuum sealed can), shall be marked to indicate the country of origin of their contents.
(3) Unsealed containers. Unsealed disposable containers of imported merchandise normally unopened by the ultimate purchaser, may be excepted from marking if the article is so marked that the country of origin is clearly visible without unpacking the container. However, if the container is normally opened by the ultimate purchaser prior to purchase, only the article need be marked.
§ 134.25Containers or holders for repacked J-list articles and articles incapable of being marked
(a) Certification requirements. If an article subject to these requirements is intended to be repacked in new containers for sale to an ultimate purchaser after its release from Customs custody, or if the Center director has reason to believe such article will be repacked after its release, the importer shall certify to the Center director that: (1) If the importer does the repacking, the new container shall be marked to indicate the country of origin of the article in accordance with the requirements of this part; or (2) if the article is intended to be sold or transferred to a subsequent purchaser or repacker, the importer shall notify such purchaser or transferee, in writing, at the time of sale or transfer, that any repacking of the article must conform to these requirements. The importer, or his authorized agent, shall sign the following statement.
Certificate of Marking—Repacked J-List Articles and Articles Incapable of Being Marked (Port of entry) I, of , certify that if the article(s) covered by this entry (entry no.(s) dated ), is (are) repacked in a new container(s), while still in my possession, the new containers, unless excepted, shall be marked in a conspicuous place as legibly, indelibly, and permanently as the nature of the container(s) will permit, in such manner as to indicate the country of origin of the article(s) to the ultimate purchaser(s) in accordance with the requirements of 19 U.S.C. 1304 and 19 CFR part 134. I further certify that if the article(s) is (are) intended to be sold or transferred by me to a subsequent purchaser or repacker, I will notify such purchaser or transferee, in writing, at the time of sale or transfer, of the marking requirements. Date Importer
Certificate of Marking—Repacked J-List Articles and Articles Incapable of Being Marked
I, of , certify that if the article(s) covered by this entry (entry no.(s) dated ), is (are) repacked in a new container(s), while still in my possession, the new containers, unless excepted, shall be marked in a conspicuous place as legibly, indelibly, and permanently as the nature of the container(s) will permit, in such manner as to indicate the country of origin of the article(s) to the ultimate purchaser(s) in accordance with the requirements of 19 U.S.C. 1304 and 19 CFR part 134. I further certify that if the article(s) is (are) intended to be sold or transferred by me to a subsequent purchaser or repacker, I will notify such purchaser or transferee, in writing, at the time of sale or transfer, of the marking requirements.
The certification statement may appear as a typed or stamped statement on an appropriate entry document or commercial invoice, or on a preprinted attachment to such entry or invoice; or it may be submitted in blanket form to cover all importations of a particular product for a given period (e.g., calendar year). If the blanket procedure is used, a certification must be filed with CBP, either at the port of entry or electronically.
(b) Facsimile signatures. The certification statement may be signed by means of an authorized facsimile signature.
(c) Time of filing. The certification statement shall be filed with the Center director at the time of entry summary. If the certification is not available at that time, a bond shall be given for its production in accordance with § 141.66, Customs Regulations (19 CFR 141.66). In case of repeated failure to timely file the certification required under this section, the Center director may decline to accept a bond for the missing document and demand redelivery of the merchandise under § 134.51, Customs Regulations (19 CFR 134.51).
(d) Notice to subsequent purchaser or repacker. If the article is sold or transferred to a subsequent purchaser or repacker the following notice shall be given to the purchaser or repacker:
Notice to Subsequent Purchaser or Repacker These articles are imported. The requirements of 19 U.S.C. 1304 and 19 CFR part 134 provide that the articles or their containers must be marked in a conspicuous place as legibly, indelibly and permanently as the nature of the article or container will permit, in such a manner as to indicate to an ultimate purchaser in the United States, the English name of the country of origin of the article.
Notice to Subsequent Purchaser or Repacker
These articles are imported. The requirements of 19 U.S.C. 1304 and 19 CFR part 134 provide that the articles or their containers must be marked in a conspicuous place as legibly, indelibly and permanently as the nature of the article or container will permit, in such a manner as to indicate to an ultimate purchaser in the United States, the English name of the country of origin of the article.
(e) Duties and penalties. Failure to comply with the certification requirements in paragraph (a) may subject the importer to a demand for liquidated damages under § 134.54(a) and for the additional duty under 19 U.S.C. 1304. Fraud or negligence by any person in furnishing the required certification may also result in a penalty under 19 U.S.C. 1592.
§ 134.26Imported articles repacked or manipulated
(a) Certification requirements. If an article subject to these requirements is intended to be repacked in retail containers (e.g., blister packs) after its release from Customs custody, or if the Center director has reason to believe such article will be repacked after its release, the importer shall certify to the Center director that: (1) If the importer does the repacking, he shall not obscure or conceal the country of origin marking appearing on the article, or else the new container shall be marked to indicate the country of origin of the article in accordance with the requirements of this part; or (2) if the article is intended to be sold or transferred to a subsequent purchaser or repacker, the importer shall notify such purchaser or transferee, in writing, at the time of sale or transfer, that any repacking of the article must conform to these requirements. The importer, or his authorized agent, shall sign the following statement.
Certificate of Marking by Importer—Repacked Articles Subject to Marking (Port of entry) I, ________ of ________, certify that if the article(s) covered by this entry (entry no.(s) ____ dated ____), is (are) repacked in retail container(s) e.g., blister packs), while still in my possession, the new container(s) will not conceal or obscure the country of origin marking appearing on the article(s), or else the new container(s), unless excepted, shall be marked in a conspicuous place as legibly, indelibly, and permanently as the nature of the container(s) will permit, in such manner as to indicate the country of origin of the article(s) to the ultimate purchaser(s) in accordance with the requirements of 19 U.S.C. 1304 and 19 CFR part 134. I further certify that if the article(s) is (are) intended to be sold or transferred by me to a subsequent purchaser or repacker, I will notify such purchaser or transferee, in writing, at the time of sale or transfer, of the marking requirements. Date Importer
Certificate of Marking by Importer—Repacked Articles Subject to Marking
I, ________ of ________, certify that if the article(s) covered by this entry (entry no.(s) ____ dated ____), is (are) repacked in retail container(s) e.g., blister packs), while still in my possession, the new container(s) will not conceal or obscure the country of origin marking appearing on the article(s), or else the new container(s), unless excepted, shall be marked in a conspicuous place as legibly, indelibly, and permanently as the nature of the container(s) will permit, in such manner as to indicate the country of origin of the article(s) to the ultimate purchaser(s) in accordance with the requirements of 19 U.S.C. 1304 and 19 CFR part 134. I further certify that if the article(s) is (are) intended to be sold or transferred by me to a subsequent purchaser or repacker, I will notify such purchaser or transferee, in writing, at the time of sale or transfer, of the marking requirements.
The certification statement may appear as a typed or stamped statement on an appropriate entry document or commercial invoice, or on a preprinted attachment to such entry or invoice; or it may be submitted in blanket form to cover all importations of a particular product for a given period (e.g., calendar year). If the blanket procedure is used, a certification must be filed with CBP, either at the port of entry or electronically.
(b) Facsimile signatures. The certification statement may be signed by means of an authorized facsimile signature.
(c) Time of filing. The certification statement shall be filed with the Center director at the time of entry summary. If the certification is not available at that time, a bond shall be given for its production in accordance with § 141.66, Customs Regulations (19 CFR 141.66). In case of repeated failure to timely file the certification required under this subsection, the Center director may decline to accept a bond for the missing document and demand redelivery of the merchandise under § 134.51, Customs Regulations (19 CFR 134.51).
(d) Notice to subsequent purchaser or repacker. If the article is sold or transferred to a subsequent purchaser or repacker the following notice shall be given to the purchaser or repacker:
Notice to Subsequent Purchaser or Repacker These articles are imported. The requirements of 19 U.S.C. 1304 and 19 CFR part 134 provide that the articles in their containers must be marked in a conspicuous place as legibly, indelibly and permanently as the nature of the article or container will permit, in such a manner as to indicate to an ultimate purchaser in the United States, the English name of the country of origin of the article.
Notice to Subsequent Purchaser or Repacker
These articles are imported. The requirements of 19 U.S.C. 1304 and 19 CFR part 134 provide that the articles in their containers must be marked in a conspicuous place as legibly, indelibly and permanently as the nature of the article or container will permit, in such a manner as to indicate to an ultimate purchaser in the United States, the English name of the country of origin of the article.
(e) Duties and penalties. Failure to comply with the certification requirements in paragraph (a) may subject the importer to a demand for liquidated damages under § 134.54(a) and for the additional duty under 19 U.S.C. 1304. Fraud or negligence by any person in furnishing the required certification may also result in a penalty under 19 U.S.C. 1592.
(f) Exceptions. The requirements of this section do not apply to repackaging in a container that can readily be opened for inspection by the ultimate purchaser in the United States, unless such container bears a U.S. address or other potentially misleading marking.
§ 134.31Requirements of other agencies
Nothing in this subpart shall be construed as excepting any article (or its container) from the particular requirements of marking provided for in any other provision of any law, such as those of the Federal Trade Commission, Food and Drug Administration, and other agencies.
§ 134.32General exceptions to marking requirements
The articles described or meeting the specified conditions set forth below are excepted from marking requirements (see subpart C of this part for marking of the containers):
(a) Articles that are incapable of being marked;
(b) Articles that cannot be marked prior to shipment to the United States without injury;
(c) Articles that cannot be marked prior to shipment to the United States except at an expense economically prohibitive of its importation;
(d) Articles for which the marking of the containers will reasonably indicate the origin of the articles;
(e) Articles which are crude substances;
(f) Articles imported for use by the importer and not intended for sale in their imported or any other form;
(g) Articles to be processed in the United States by the importer or for his account otherwise than for the purpose of concealing the origin of such articles and in such manner that any mark contemplated by this part would necessarily be obliterated, destroyed, or permanently concealed;
(h) Articles for which the ultimate purchaser must necessarily know, or in the case of a good of a NAFTA or USMCA country, must reasonably know, the country of origin by reason of the circumstances of their importation or by reason of the character of the articles even though they are not marked to indicate their origin;
(i) Articles which were produced more than 20 years prior to their importation into the United States;
(j) Articles entered or withdrawn from warehouse for immediate exportation or for transportation and exportation;
(k) Products of American fisheries which are free of duty;
(l) Products of possessions of the United States;
(m) Products of the United States exported and returned;
(n) Articles exempt from duty under §§ 10.151 through 10.153, § 145.31 or § 145.32 of this chapter;
(o) Articles which cannot be marked after importation except at an expense that would be economically prohibitive unless the importer, producer, seller, or shipper failed to mark the articles before importation to avoid meeting the requirements of the law;
(p) Goods of a NAFTA or USMCA country which are original works of art; and
(q) Goods of a NAFTA or USMCA country which are provided for in subheading 6904.10 or heading 8541 or 8542 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) (19 U.S.C. 1202).
§ 134.33J-List exceptions · full text and 5 exam questions
§ 134.34Certain repacked articles
(a) Exception for repacked articles. An exception under § 134.32(d) may be authorized in the discretion of the Center director for imported articles which are to be repacked after release from Customs custody under the following conditions:
(1) The containers in which the articles are repacked will indicate the origin of the articles to an ultimate purchaser in the United States.
(2) The importer arranges for supervision of the marking of the containers by Customs officers at the importer's expense or secures such verification, as may be necessary, by certification and the submission of a sample or otherwise, of the marking prior to the liquidation of the entry.
(b) Liquidation of entries. The liquidation of such entries may be deferred for a period of not more than 60 days from the date that a request for repacking is granted. Extensions of the 60-day deferral period may be granted by the Center director in his discretion upon written application by the importer.
§ 134.35Articles substantially changed by manufacture
(a) Articles other than goods of a NAFTA or USMCA country. An article used in the United States in manufacture which results in an article having a name, character, or use differing from that of the imported article, will be within the principle of the decision in the case of United States v. Gibson-Thomsen Co., Inc., 27 C.C.P.A. 267 (C.A.D. 98). Under this principle, the manufacturer or processor in the United States who converts or combines the imported article into the different article will be considered the “ultimate purchaser” of the imported article within the contemplation of section 304(a), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1304(a)), and the article shall be excepted from marking. The outermost containers of the imported articles shall be marked in accord with this part.
(b) Goods of a NAFTA or USMCA country. A good of a NAFTA or USMCA country which is to be processed in the United States in a manner that would result in the good becoming a good of the United States under the part 102 Rules is excepted from marking. Unless the good is processed by the importer or on its behalf, the outermost container of the good shall be marked in accord with this part.
§ 134.36Inapplicability of marking exception for articles processed by importer
An article which is to be processed in the United States by the importer or for his account shall not be considered to be within the specifications of section 304(a)(3)(G), of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1304(a)(3)(G)), if there is a reasonable method of marking which will not be obliterated, destroyed, or permanently concealed by such processing.
§ 134.41Methods and manner of marking
(a) Suggested methods of marking. Section 304 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1304), requires that the marking of the country of origin be legible, indelible, and permanent. Definite methods of marking are prescribed only for articles provided for in § 134.43 and for articles which are the objects of special rulings by the Commissioner of Customs. As a general rule, marking requirements are best met by marking worked into the article at the time of manufacture. For example, it is suggested that the country of origin on metal articles be die sunk, molded in or etched; on earthenware or chinaware be glazed on in the process of firing; and on paper articles be imprinted.
(b) Degree of permanence and visibility. The degree of permanence should be at least sufficient to insure that in any reasonably foreseeable circumstance, the marking shall remain on the article (or its container) until it reaches the ultimate purchaser unless it is deliberately removed. The marking must survive normal distribution and store handling. The ultimate purchaser in the United States must be able to find the marking easily and read it without strain.
§ 134.42Specific method may be required
Marking merchandise by specific methods, such as die stamping, cast-in-the-mold lettering, etching, or engraving, or cloth labels may be required by the Commissioner of Customs in accordance with section 304(a), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1304(a)). Notices of such rulings shall be published in the Federal Register and the Customs Bulletin.
§ 134.43Methods of marking specific articles
(a) Marking previously required by certain provisions of the Tariff Act of 1930. Except for goods of a NAFTA or USMCA country, articles of a class or kind listed below shall be marked legibly and conspicuously by die stamping, cast-in-the-mold lettering, etching (acid or electrolytic), engraving, or by means of metal plates which bear the prescribed marking and which are securely attached to the article in a conspicuous place by welding, screws, or rivets: knives, forks, steels, cleavers, clippers, shears, scissors, safety razors, blades for safety razors, surgical instruments, dental instruments, scientific and laboratory instruments, pliers, pincers, nippers and hinged hand tools for holding and splicing wire, vacuum containers, and parts of the above articles. Goods of a NAFTA or USMCA country shall be marked by any reasonable method which is legible, conspicuous and permanent as otherwise provided in this part.
(b) Watch, clock, and timing apparatus. The country of origin marking requirements on watches, clocks, and timing apparatus are intensive and require special methods. (See § 11.9 of this chapter and Chapter 91, Additional U.S. Note 4, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (19 U.S.C. 1202)).
(c) Native American-style jewelry—(1) Definition. For the purpose of this provision, Native American-style jewelry is jewelry which incorporates traditional Native American design motifs, materials and/or construction and therefore looks like, and could possibly be mistaken for, jewelry made by Native Americans.
(2) Method of marking. Except as provided in 19 U.S.C. 1304(a)(3) and in paragraph (c)(3) of this section, Native American-style jewelry must be indelibly marked with the country of origin by cutting, die-sinking, engraving, stamping, or some other permanent method. The indelible marking must appear legibly on the clasp or in some other conspicuous location, or alternatively, on a metal or plastic tag indelibly marked with the country of origin and permanently attached to the article.
(3) Exception. If it is technically or commercially infeasible to mark in the manner specified in paragraph (c)(2) of this section, or in the case of a good of a NAFTA or USMCA country, the article may be marked by means of a string tag or adhesive label securely affixed, or some other similar method.
(d) Native American-style arts and crafts—(1) Definition. For the purpose of this provision, Native American-style arts and crafts are arts and crafts, such as pottery, rugs, kachina dolls, baskets and beadwork, which incorporate traditional Native American design motifs, materials and/or construction and therefore look like, and could possibly be mistaken for, arts and crafts made by Native Americans.
(2) Method of Marking. Except as provided for in 19 U.S.C. 1304(a)(3) and § 134.32 of this part, Native American-style arts and crafts must be indelibly marked with the country of origin by means of cutting, die-sinking, engraving, stamping, or some other equally permanent method. On textile articles, such as rugs, a sewn in label is considered to be an equally permanent method.
(3) Exception. Where it is technically or commercially infeasible to mark in the manner specified in paragraph (d)(2) of this section, or in the case of a good of a NAFTA or USMCA country, the article may be marked by means of a string tag or adhesive label securely affixed, or some other similar method.
(e) Assembled articles. Where an article is produced as a result of an assembly operation and the country of origin of such article is determined under this chapter to be the country in which the article was finally assembled, such article may be marked, as appropriate, in a manner such as the following:
(1) Assembled in (country of final assembly);
(2) Assembled in (country of final assembly) from components of (name of country or countries of origin of all components); or
(3) Made in, or product of, (country of final assembly).
§ 134.44Location and other acceptable methods of marking
(a) Other acceptable methods. Except for articles described in § 134.43 of this part or the subject of a ruling by the Commissioner of Customs, any method of marking at any location insuring that country of origin will conspicuously appear on the article shall be acceptable. Such marking must be legible and sufficiently permanent so that it will remain on the article (or its container when the container and not the article is required to be marked) until it reaches the ultimate purchaser unless deliberately removed.
(b) Articles marked with paper sticker labels. If paper sticker or pressure sensitive labels are used, they must be affixed in a conspicuous place and so securely that unless deliberately removed they will remain on the article while it is in storage or on display and until it is delivered to the ultimate purchaser.
(c) Articles marked with tags. When tags are used, they must be attached in a conspicuous place and in a manner which assures that unless deliberately removed they will remain on the article until it reaches the ultimate purchaser.
§ 134.45Approved markings of country name
(a) Language. (1) Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (a)(2) of this section, the markings required by this part shall include the full English name of the country of origin, unless another marking to indicate the English name of the country of origin is specifically authorized by the Commissioner of Customs. Notice of acceptable markings other than the full English name of the country of origin shall be published in the Federal Register and the Customs Bulletin.
(2) A good of a NAFTA or USMCA country may be marked with the name of the country of origin in English, French or Spanish.
(b) Abbreviations and variant spellings. Abbreviations which unmistakably indicate the name of a country, such as “Gt. Britain” for “Great Britain” or “Luxemb” and “Luxembg” for “Luxembourg” are acceptable. Variant spellings which clearly indicate the English name of the country of origin, such as “Brasil” for “Brazil” and “Italie” for “Italy,” are acceptable.
(c) Adjectival form. The adjectival form of the name of a country shall be accepted as a proper indication of the name of the country of origin of imported merchandise provided the adjectival form of the name does not appear with other words so as to refer to a kind or species of product. For example, such terms as “English walnuts” or “Brazil nuts” are unacceptable.
(d) Colonies, possessions, or protectorates. The name of a colony, possession, or protectorate outside the boundaries of the mother country shall usually be considered acceptable marking. When the Commissioner of Customs finds that the name is not sufficiently well known to insure that the ultimate purchasers will be fully informed of the country of origin, or where the name appearing alone may cause confusion, deception, or mistake, clarifying words shall be required. In such cases, the Commissioner of Customs shall specify in decisions published in the Federal Register and the Customs Bulletin the additional wording to be used in conjunction with the name of the colony, possession, or protectorate.
§ 134.46Marking when name of country or locality other than country of origin appears
In any case in which the words “United States,” or “American,” the letters “U.S.A.,” any variation of such words or letters, or the name of any city or location in the United States, or the name of any foreign country or locality other than the country or locality in which the article was manufactured or produced appear on an imported article or its container, and those words, letters or names may mislead or deceive the ultimate purchaser as to the actual country of origin of the article, there shall appear legibly and permanently in close proximity to such words, letters or name, and in at least a comparable size, the name of the country of origin preceded by “Made in,” “Product of,” or other words of similar meaning.
§ 134.47Souvenirs and articles marked with trademarks or trade names
When as part of a trademark or trade name or as part of a souvenir marking, the name of a location in the United States or “United States” or “America” appear, the article shall be legibly, conspicuously, and permanently marked to indicate the name of the country of origin of the article preceded by “Made in,” “Product of,” or other similar words, in close proximity or in some other conspicuous location.
§ 134.51Procedure when importation found not legally marked
(a) Notice to mark or redeliver. When articles or containers are found upon examination not to be legally marked, the Center director shall notify the importer on Customs Form 4647, or its electronic equivalent, to arrange with the Center director's office to properly mark the article or containers, or to return all released articles to Customs custody for marking, exportation, or destruction.
(b) Identification of articles. When an imported article which is not legally marked is to be exported, destroyed, or marked under Customs supervision, the identity of the imported article shall be established to the satisfaction of the Center director.
(c) Supervision. Verification of marking, exportation, or destruction of articles found not to be legally marked shall be at the expense of the importer and shall be performed under Customs supervision unless the Center director accepts a certificate of marking as provided for in § 134.52 in lieu of marking under Customs supervision.
§ 134.52Certificate of marking
(a) Applicability. Center directors may accept certificates of marking supported by samples of articles required to be marked, for which Customs Form 4647, or its electronic equivalent, was issued, from importers or from actual owners complying with the provision of § 141.20 of this chapter, to certify that marking of the country of origin on imported articles as required by this part has been accomplished.
(b) Filing of certificates of marking. The certificates of marking shall be filed in duplicate with CBP, either at the port of entry or electronically, and a sample of the marked merchandise shall accompany the certificate. The Center director may waive the production of the marked sample when he is satisfied that the submission of such sample is impracticable.
(c) Notice of acceptance. The Center director shall notify the importer or actual owner when the certificate of marking is accepted. Such notice of acceptance may be granted on the duplicate copy of the certificate of marking by use of a stamped notation of acceptance. The Center director is authorized to spot check the marking of articles on which a certificate has been filed. If a spot check is performed, the approved copy of the certificate, if approval is granted, shall be returned to the importer or actual owner after the spot check is completed.
(d) Filing of false certificate of marking. If a false certificate of marking is filed with the Center director indicating that goods have been properly marked when in fact they have not been so marked, a seizure shall be made or claim for monetary penalty reported under section 592, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1592). In addition, in cases involving, willful deceit, a criminal case report may be made charging a violation of section 1001, title 18, United States Code, which provides for a fine up to $10,000 and/or imprisonment up to 5 years for anyone who willfully conceals a material fact or uses any document knowing the same to contain any false or fraudulent statement in connection with any matter within the jurisdiction of an agency of the United States.
(e) Authority to require physical supervision when deemed necessary. The Center director may require physical supervision of marking as specified in § 134.51(c) in those cases in which he determines that such action is necessary to insure compliance with this part. In such cases the expenses of the Customs officer shall be reimbursed to the Government as provided for in § 134.55.
§ 134.53Examination packages
(a) Site of marking—(1) Customs custody. Articles (or containers) in examination packages may be marked by the importer at the place where they have been discharged from the importing or bonded carrier or in the public stores.
(2) Importer's premises or elsewhere. If it is impracticable to mark the articles (or containers) in examination packages as provided in paragraph (a)(1) of this section, the merchandise may be turned over to the importer after the amount of duty, estimated to be payable under 19 U.S.C. 1304(f) has been deposited to insure compliance with the marking requirements and the payment of any additional expense which will be incurred on account of Customs supervision. (See § 134.55.) The Center director may at his discretion accept the bond on Customs Form 301, containing the basic importation and entry bond conditions set forth in § 113.62 of this chapter as security for the requirements of 19 U.S.C. 1304 (f) and (g).
(b) Failure to export, destroy, or properly mark merchandise in examination packages. If the articles (or containers) in examination packages are not exported, destroyed, or properly marked by the importer within a reasonable time (not more than 30 days), they shall be sent to general-order stores for disposition in accordance with part 127 of this chapter, unless covered by a warehouse entry. If covered by a warehouse entry, they shall be sent to the warehouse containing the rest of the shipment for marking prior to withdrawal.
§ 134.54Articles released from Customs custody
(a) Demand for liquidated damages. If within 30 days from the date of the notice of redelivery, or such additional period as the Center director may allow for good cause shown, the importer does not properly mark or redeliver all merchandise previously released to him, the port director shall demand payment of liquidated damages incurred under the bond in an amount equal to the entered value of the articles not properly marked or redelivered.
(b) Failure to petition for relief. A written petition addressed to the Commissioner of Customs for relief from the payment of liquidated damages may be filed with the Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer in accord with part 172 of this chapter.
(c) Relief from full liquidated damages. Any relief from the payment of the full liquidated damages incurred will be contingent upon the deposit of the marking duty required by 19 U.S.C. 1304(f), and the satisfaction of the Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer that the importer was not guilty of bad faith in permitting the illegally marked articles to be distributed, has been diligent in attempting to secure compliance with the marking requirements, and has attempted by all reasonable means to effect redelivery of the merchandise.
§ 134.55Compensation of Customs officers and employees
(a) Time for which compensation is charged. The time for which compensation is charged shall include all periods devoted to supervision and all periods during which Customs officers or employees are away from their regular posts of duty by reason of such assignment and for which compensation to such officers and employees is provided for by law.
(b) Applicability—(1) Official hours. The compensation of Customs Officers or employees assigned to supervise the exportation, destruction, or marking of articles so as to exempt them from the application of marking duties shall be computed in accordance with the provisions of §§ 24.16 or 24.17(a)(3), respectively, of this chapter when such supervision is performed during a regularly-scheduled tour of duty.
(2) Overtime. When such supervision is performed by a Customs Officer or employee in an overtime status, the compensation with respect to the overtime shall be computed in accordance with the provisions of § 24.16 or § 24.17, respectively, of this chapter.
(c) Expenses included. In formulating charges for expenses pertaining to supervision of exportation, destruction, or marking, there shall be included all expenses of transportation, per diem allowance in lieu of subsistence, and all other expenses incurred by reason of such supervision from the time the Customs officer leaves his official station until he returns thereto.
(d) Services rendered for more than one importer. If the importations of more than one importer are concurrently supervised, the service rendered for each importer shall be regarded as a separate assignment, but the total amount of the compensation, and any expenses properly applicable to more than one importer, shall be equitably apportioned among the importers concerned.
Other exam questions from Part 134
April 2018, Q75. Which of the below is not an approved marking method?
- AGoods of a NAFTA country may be marked with the name of the country of origin in English, French or Spanish
- BCountry of Origin marking shall be marked in a conspicuous place, legibly, indelibly, and permanently
- CWhen technically infeasible to permanently mark a good of a NAFTA country, the article may be marked by means of a string tag or adhesive label securely affixed
- DArticles marked with paper sticker labels must be affixed in a conspicuous place and must be sufficiently permanent
- EThe country or origin label may be sewn into the inside of the pocket
Show the answer and explanation
The correct answer is E because the regulations require the country of origin marking to be "conspicuous" and "easily found by the ultimate purchaser," which sewing into a pocket does not satisfy. The HTSUS text (19 CFR 134.41(b)) emphasizes that markings must survive normal handling and be visible without strain, making internal placement non-compliant. Options A, B, C, and D align with the rules: A reflects NAFTA marking language allowances, B and D specify required legibility and permanence, and C permits temporary alternatives when permanent marking is infeasible.
April 2018, Q76. Any intentional removal, defacement, destruction, or alteration of a marking of the country of origin required by section 304, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1304), and 19 CFR 134 in order to conceal this information may result in criminal penalties of :
- Aup to $1,000 and/or imprisonment for 1 year, as provided in 19 U.S.C. 1304(h).
- Bup to $2,000 and/or imprisonment for 1 year, as provided in 19 U.S.C. 1304(h).
- Cup to $3,000 and/or imprisonment for 1 year, as provided in 19 U.S.C. 1304(h).
- Dup to $4,000 and/or imprisonment for 1 year, as provided in 19 U.S.C. 1304(h).
- Eup to $5,000 and/or imprisonment for 1 year, as provided in 19 U.S.C. 1304(h).
Show the answer and explanation
The correct answer is E because 19 CFR 134.4 explicitly states that the penalty for the described violations is "up to 5,000 and/or imprisonment for 1 year," directly matching option E. The other options (A–D) are incorrect because they cite lower monetary penalties not mentioned in the cited regulation. The authority is clear and specific, leaving no room for alternative interpretations based on other sections or rules.
April 2019, Q9. Fish are caught by a Norwegian flagged vessel in international waters off the coast of Portugal. The fish are kept either whole or filleted on-board. The fillets are sent to England, where they are seasoned, battered, and pre-fried. What is the country of origin of the battered fillets?
- APortugal
- BEngland
- CNorway
- DCanada
- ESpain
Show the answer and explanation
Country of origin under 19 CFR 134.1(b) is the country of manufacture, production or growth, and later work in another country changes it only where that work is a substantial transformation. Fish taken on the high seas are products of the flag state, so these fillets leave the vessel as Norwegian goods; Portugal is merely the coast the vessel fished off, and never touches the fish. Seasoning, battering and pre-frying in England produces an article with a new name, character and use, which is a substantial transformation, so the battered fillets are a product of England. That is answer B. Norway is the origin only up to the point the fillets are processed, and Canada and Spain play no part in the facts.
April 2019, Q10. Die cut steel plier levers were bolted together in China before having rubberized non-slip grips attached to each lever handle in Germany prior to being imported into the United States. What is the proper country of origin and marking method?
- AMade in Beijing printed on a hangtag
- BMade in China printed on a sticker attached to the pliers
- CMade in China die stamped into the pliers
- DAssembled in Germany printed on a sticker attached to the pliers
- EThe pliers are exempt from marking in accordance with the J list
Show the answer and explanation
The correct answer is C because the pliers are of Chinese origin, as the final substantial transformation occurs in China when the levers are bolted together, and the addition of rubber grips in Germany is a minor assembly step. Under 19 CFR 134.43(a), tools like pliers must be marked by die stamping, which is a permanent method required for non-NAFTA/USMCA goods. Options A, B, and D use stickers or hangtags, which are only permissible if marking by die stamping is infeasible, which is not indicated here. Option E is incorrect because the J list exemption does not apply to this category of goods.
April 2021, Q71. The articles described or meeting the specified conditions set forth below are exempt from marking requirements EXCEPT:
- AArticles that are incapable of being marked .
- BArticles that can be marked prior to shipment to the United States without injury.
- CArticles that cannot be marked prior to shipment to the United States except at an expense economically prohibitive of its importation.
- DArticles for which the marking of the containers will reasonably indicate the origin of the articles.
- EArticles which are crude substances .
Show the answer and explanation
The correct answer is B because 19 CFR 134.32 explicitly lists exemptions for articles that cannot be marked prior to shipment without injury (option b), but does not exempt articles that can be marked without injury. Since the question asks for the exception (i.e., the one not exempt), option B is the only choice not covered by the exemptions in 19 CFR 134.32. The other options (A, C, D, E) are directly listed as exemptions in the same section, making them incorrect.
April 2021, Q73. Which of the below is FALSE regarding marking?
- AContainers of articles excepted from marking shall be marked with the name of the country of origin of the article unless the container is also excepted from marking.
- BSpecial marking may be required by the Internal Revenue Service on alcoholic beverage bottles and other requirements may be imposed by reason of the nature of the contents by other Government agencies.
- CA good of a NAFTA country which is a usual container, whether or not disposable and whether or not imported empty or filled, is required to be marked with its own country of origin.
- DArticles which are crude substances are excepted from marking requirements .
- ECut flowers are listed on the J-List.
Show the answer and explanation
The correct answer is C because 19 CFR 134.22(2) explicitly excepts usual containers (whether disposable or not) from marking requirements, regardless of their origin. This directly contradicts option C’s claim that such containers must be marked with their country of origin. Option A is correct as 19 CFR 134.11 mandates marking containers of excepted articles with the country of origin unless the container itself is also excepted. Option B is valid under 19 CFR 134.33, which allows special markings for alcoholic beverages and other agency requirements. Option D is correct per 19 CFR 132.34(e), which lists crude substances as excepted from marking. Option E is not addressed in the cited authority, so its accuracy cannot be confirmed based on the given authority.
April 2022, Q11. The following statements are all true EXCEPT:
- AUnless covered by a warehouse entry, articles in examination packages that have not been exported, destroyed, or properly marked by the importer within 30 days shall be sent to general order (GO) stores for disposition.
- BAn imported article, which is not a good of a North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) or United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) country, that is used in the U.S. in manufacture which results in an article having a name, character, or use differing from that of the imported article, will be within the principle of the decision in the case of United States v. Gibson-Thomsen Co., Inc., 27 C.C.P.A. 267 (C.A.D. 98). These articles are considered substantially changed by the manufacturer and do not require country of origin marking at the time of importation. However, the outermost containers of the imported articles shall be properly marked.
- CUnless excepted by law, the English name of the country of origin of an article of foreign origin imported into the U.S. shall be marked in a conspicuous place as legibly, indelibly, and permanently as the nature of the article will permit, at the time of importation into the Customs territory of the U.S.
- DAll marking requirements applicable to articles of foreign origin imported directly from a foreign country into the U.S. apply to similar articles of foreign origin that are imported into a U.S. possession outside its Customs territory and reshipped to the U.S.
- EWithout additional time allowed by the Center director, if an importer does not properly mark or redeliver all merchandise previously released to the importer within 45 calendar days from the date of the notice of redelivery, the port director shall demand payment of liquidated damages incurred under the bond in an amount equal to the entered value of the articles not properly marked or redelivered.
Show the answer and explanation
The correct answer is E because 19 CFR 134.54(a) specifies a 30-day period (not 45 days) for the importer to properly mark or redeliver merchandise after a notice of redelivery, with possible extensions only if the Center director allows them for good cause. The other options align with the cited regulations or case law: A reflects proper handling of examination packages under 19 CFR 134.54; B correctly applies the Gibson-Thomsen principle regarding substantial transformation and marking requirements; C adheres to 19 U.S.C. 1304’s country-of-origin marking rules; and D is consistent with marking requirements for articles imported into U.S. possessions under 19 CFR 134.54.
April 2022, Q13. In cases where the Center director determines that physical supervision of marking is necessary to ensure compliance, the expenses of the Customs officer shall be reimbursed with the following provisions EXCEPT:
- AAll expenses of transportation and all other expenses incurred pertaining to supervision of exportation, destruction, or marking from the time the Customs officer leaves the official station until the officer returns thereto.
- BAll periods devoted to supervision and all periods during which the Customs officers are away from their regular posts of duty and for which compensation to such officers is provided for by law.
- CServices performed in overtime status, irrespective of when the Customs officer files an application for overtime services.
- DIf importations of 2 importers are concurrently supervised, the service rendered for each importer shall be regarded as a separate assignment, but the total amount of compensation, and any expenses properly applicable to each importer, shall be equally distributed between the importers concerned.
- EWhen such supervision is performed during a regularly scheduled tour of duty, the compensation of Customs officers shall be computed in accordance with the provisions of 19 CFR 24.17.
Show the answer and explanation
The correct answer is C because 19 CFR 134.55(b)(2) specifies that overtime compensation for supervision must follow the provisions of 24.16 or 24.17, but it does not mention reimbursement based on the timing of an application for overtime services. The other options are explicitly covered by the cited text: A is addressed in 134.55(c) (transportation and other expenses), B in 134.55(a) (all periods of supervision), D in 134.55(d) (equitable apportionment for multiple importers), and E in 134.55(b)(1) (regularly scheduled tours). Option C introduces a condition (application timing) not referenced in the authority, making it the exception.
April 2022, Q17. Intentional removal, defacement, destruction, or alteration of a marking of the country of origin to conceal the country of origin may result in criminal penalties. What is the maximum monetary penalty and/or prison sentence that may be assessed?
- A$500.00 and/or imprisonment for 2 years
- B$5,000.00 and/or imprisonment for 1 year
- C$6,000.00 and/or imprisonment for 11 years
- D$50,000.00 and imprisonment for 2 years
- E$50,000.00 and imprisonment for 11 years
Show the answer and explanation
The correct answer is B because 19 CFR 134.4 explicitly states the maximum penalty is 5,000 and/or 1 year imprisonment for the specified violations. Options A, C, D, and E are incorrect because they either inflate the monetary penalty (e.g., 500, 6,000, 50,000) or the prison term (e.g., 2 years, 11 years) beyond the limits set by 19 U.S.C. 1304(h), which is cited in the regulation. The authority text does not support any higher amounts or longer sentences than those in option B.
April 2023, Q9. Which section of the Customs Regulations states the general exceptions to the marking requirements?
- A19 CFR 134.22
- B19 CFR 134.32
- C19 CFR 134.41
- D19 CFR 134.43
- E19 CFR 134.44
Show the answer and explanation
The correct answer is B) 19 CFR 134.32, as this section explicitly lists the general exceptions to marking requirements, including articles incapable of being marked, those requiring post-importation marking, and other specific conditions. The other options (A, C, D, E) do not address exceptions to marking requirements but instead pertain to other aspects of marking procedures, verification, or specific exemptions not outlined in the cited authority. The cited text under 19 CFR 134.32 directly supports the answer by enumerating the exceptions.
April 2025, Q10. Sixty-one days ago, an authorized CBP official properly demanded that a broker, who was acting as importer for a released shipment and is also the bond principal, redeliver to CBP custody the merchandise from that shipment. The merchandise was not legally marked with its country of origin for the purpose of requiring the merchandise to be properly marked. In the meantime, the broker has taken no action, and the Center director did not give a good cause extension. CBP has now demanded liquidated damages in an amount equal to the entered value of the shipment. The broker wants relief from full payment. Which of the following is therefore legally TRUE?
- AA petition for relief from payment of liquidated damages to CBP must be filed within 90 days of receiving the Notice to Mark / Notice to Redeliver (CBP Form 4647).
- BA proper petition for relief from payment of liquidated damages is one that is written, addressed to the Commissioner of Customs and filed with the Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer within 60 days from the date of mailing to the bond principal the notice of claim for liquidated damages.
- CA proper petition for relief from payment of liquidated damages is filed within 180 days of the date of liquidation of the entry summary.
- DThe broker is not allowed to petition for relief from payment of liquidated damages because there is no petition process for liquidated damages.
Show the answer and explanation
The correct answer is B because 19 CFR 134.54(b) explicitly permits a written petition for relief from liquidated damages to be filed with the Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer within 60 days of the notice of claim being mailed to the bond principal. This aligns with the procedural timeline outlined in the cited authority. Option A is incorrect because the 90-day period applies to the Notice to Mark/Redeliver (CBP Form 4647), not the subsequent notice of claim for liquidated damages. Option C is incorrect because the 180-day period pertains to liquidation of the entry summary, not the relief process for liquidated damages. Option D is incorrect because 19 CFR 134.54(b) clearly establishes a petition process for relief from liquidated damages.
April 2025, Q43. Choose the ONE answer that correctly fills the blank. Per 19 CFR 134.41, Marking of Country of Origin, should be these three things: Legible, Indelible and _____.
- APermanent
- BTemporary
- CBrief
- DProvisional
Show the answer and explanation
The correct answer is A) Permanent because 19 CFR 134.41(a) explicitly states that the marking must be "legible, indelible, and permanent," ensuring it remains intact until reaching the ultimate purchaser. Options B, C, and D are incorrect because "temporary," "brief," and "provisional" contradict the requirement for permanence outlined in the regulation, which mandates the marking must survive normal handling and remain visible to the final buyer.
April 2025, Q59. The Umbrella Corporation produces robots as a result of an assembly operation in its facility in Vietnam using components from Thailand and China. It was determined that the country of origin of these robots will be the country of final assembly. The Umbrella Corporation intends to import these robots to the United States. Which of the following is an INCORRECT origin marking?
- AProduct of Vietnam, Thailand, and China
- BAssembled in Vietnam from components of Thailand and China
- CAssembled in Vietnam
- DMade in Vietnam
Show the answer and explanation
The correct answer is A because 19 CFR 134.43(e) permits marking assembled articles as "Assembled in [country]" or "Assembled in [country] from components of [component countries]," but does not allow listing multiple countries as the origin when the origin is determined to be the country of final assembly. Option A incorrectly identifies all component countries as the origin, violating the rule that the origin must be the final assembly country (Vietnam). Options B, C, and D comply with the regulation by either specifying the assembly location or using acceptable synonyms like "Made in" for the origin.
April 2026, Q54. Which of the following abbreviations or alternate spellings is unacceptable according to regulations found in 19 CFR 134?
- ALuxemb for Luxembourg
- BGt. Britain for Great Britain
- CIta for Italy
- DBrasil for Brazil
Show the answer and explanation
The correct answer is C because 19 CFR 134.45(b) explicitly permits variant spellings like "Brasil" for "Brazil" and "Italie" for "Italy," but does not authorize the abbreviation "Ita" for "Italy." The regulation requires that abbreviations or variant spellings must "unmistakably indicate" or "clearly indicate" the full English name of the country. "Ita" is too abbreviated and lacks clarity, whereas "Italie" is a recognized variant spelling. The other options (A, B, D) are explicitly listed as acceptable in the cited text.
May 2024, Q49. A liquid sauce is prepared in Japan by mixing raw materials from Japan, China, Thailand, and the United States. The raw materials from Japan are water, liquid sugar, salt, apple pulp, orange pulp, bonito extract, squid extract, citric acid, konbu, and paprika. The raw materials from China are garlic, fermented vegetables, chili pepper and ginger. The raw materials from the United States are soy protein hydrolysate and xanthum gum. The raw material from Thailand is s-inosinate. What is the country of origin marking on the bottles of sauce, all of which are to be shipped to the United States and sold in United States grocery stores?
- AProduct of China
- BProduct of Thailand
- CProduct of Japan
- DProduct of the USA
Show the answer and explanation
The correct answer is C) Product of Japan because the sauce is prepared in Japan, and the country of origin is determined by where the article is manufactured or produced, not by the origin of its components, as per 19 CFR 134.1(b). Substantial transformation is required for another country to be considered the origin, but no such transformation is indicated here. Options A, B, and D are incorrect because the raw materials from those countries do not meet the criteria for origin under the rule, and the sauce is not produced in those locations.
May 2024, Q50. What is the appropriate country of origin marking for an unsealed, disposable, cardboard shoe box manufactured in Japan that reads "Kickers! America's Favorite Shoes" on the top panel of the box when it is imported with a pair of shoes manufactured in India that are properly marked as “Made in India” on the inside tongue of each shoe?
- AThe unsealed, disposable, cardboard shoe box is exempt from marking with the country of origin of the shoes because the shoes are already properly marked with the country of origin of the shoes.
- BThe unsealed, disposable, cardboard shoe box must be marked as “Made in” or “Product of” Japan or words of similar meaning.
- CThe unsealed, disposable, cardboard shoe box must be marked with the country of origin of the shoes on the top panel of the box.
- DThe unsealed, disposable, cardboard shoe box must be marked with the country of origin of the box and the shoe.
Show the answer and explanation
The correct answer is C because the shoe box, as a container of the shoes, must be marked with the country of origin of the shoes (India) under 19 CFR 134.46, which requires containers to indicate the origin of the contained article unless the container is excepted. Option A is incorrect because the marking of the shoes does not exempt the container from its own marking requirements. Option B is incorrect because the box must reflect the origin of the shoes, not its own origin (Japan). Option D is incorrect because the box does not need to mark both its origin and the shoes’ origin; the rule specifically ties the container’s marking to the article’s origin.
October 2019, Q20. All of the following are General exceptions to Country of Origin marking requirements EXCEPT:
- AArticles that cannot be marked prior to shipment to the United States without injury
- BArticles for which the marking of the containers will reasonably indicate the origin of the articles
- CArticles which were produced 15 years prior to their importation into the United States
- DArticles imported for use by the importer and not intended for sale in their imported or any other form
- EGoods of a NAFTA country which are provided for in subheading 6904.10 or heading 8541 or 8542 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) (19 U.S.C. 1202)
Show the answer and explanation
The correct answer is C because 19 CFR 134.32(i) explicitly lists "articles which were produced more than 20 years prior to their importation" as an exception, not 15 years. The other options correspond to exceptions outlined in the same section: A matches (b), B matches (d), D matches (f), and E matches (q). Option C fails to meet the 20-year threshold required by the cited authority, making it the only option not exempt.
October 2020 (AM), Q24. What is the country of origin marking for a product being imported into the United States for which manufacture took place in China but was exported from Panama?
- AMade in Panama
- BHecho en China
- CMade in China
- DMade in China and Panama
- EHecho en Panama y China
Show the answer and explanation
The correct answer is C because the country of origin marking is determined by where the product was manufactured, not where it was exported from. Under 19 CFR 134.11, the marking must indicate the English name of the country where the article was made at the time of importation. Since the product was manufactured in China, "Made in China" is required, regardless of Panama’s role as the export point. Options A, D, and E incorrectly attribute origin to Panama or combine countries, while B uses Spanish, which is not required for U.S. marking.
October 2020 (AM), Q26. What are the Customs Territories of the United States?
- AThe states, District of Columbia, and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
- BThe states, Virgin Islands, and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
- CThe states, District of Columbia, Virgin Islands
- DThe states, District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands, American Samoa
- EThe states, Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands, American Samoa, and island of Guam
Show the answer and explanation
The correct answer is A because 19 CFR 134.1(f) explicitly defines the Customs territory of the United States as including the states, the District of Columbia, and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. Other options are incorrect because 19 CFR 134.1(e) excludes the Virgin Islands, American Samoa, Wake Island, Midway Islands, Kingman Reef, Johnston Island, and Guam from the definition of "United States," and 134.1(f) does not include the Virgin Islands in the Customs territory. The inclusion of excluded territories in other options reflects a misunderstanding of the distinction between U.S. possessions and the specific Customs territory as defined in the regulation.
October 2020 (PM), Q24. How is an importer notified by CBP when articles in their shipment are found, upon examination, NOT to be legally marked with the country of origin?
- ACBP Form 28
- BCBP Form 214
- CCBP Form 3499
- DCBP Form 4647
- ECBP Form 5106
Show the answer and explanation
The correct answer is D) CBP Form 4647 because 19 CFR 134.51(a) explicitly states that the Center director must notify the importer using this form when articles are found not to be legally marked. Other options are incorrect because the cited authority does not reference Forms 28, 214, 3499, or 5106 in the context of marking violations. The regulation specifically ties the notification requirement to Form 4647, making it the only valid choice.
October 2021, Q9. What is the appropriate country of origin marking for a pair of shoes manufactured in China and imported with its unsealed shoebox that reads “Kicks! America's Favorite Sneaker”?
- AShoes must be marked with country of origin; shoebox is exempt from country of origin marking.
- BShoes are exempt from country of origin marking.
- CBoth the shoebox and shoes must be marked with country of origin.
- DOnly the shoebox must be marked with country of origin.
- EShoes and shoebox can be marked with a sticker stating the country of origin.
Show the answer and explanation
The correct answer is C because the shoebox's use of "America's Favorite Sneaker" may mislead consumers about the shoes' origin, triggering 19 CFR 134.46's requirement that both the article (shoes) and its container (shoebox) be marked with the country of origin in close proximity and comparable size to the misleading text. Option A is incorrect because the container is not exempt when it contains potentially deceptive language. Option B is wrong because the shoes themselves are the imported article and must be marked. Option D is incorrect because the shoebox's marking alone does not satisfy the regulation's requirement for both the article and container. Option E is not supported by the regulation, which does not mention stickers as a permissible method of marking.
October 2022, Q39. Fish are caught by a Norwegian flagged vessel in international waters off the coast of Portugal. The fish are kept either whole or filleted on board. The fish is sent to Spain, where it is cut, seasoned, battered, pre-fried and frozen. The frozen fish is consolidated with other frozen foods into a container in Ireland and exported from the Port of Dublin to the US. What is the country of origin of the frozen fish?
- APortugal
- BSpain
- CNorway
- DEuropean Union
- EIreland
Show the answer and explanation
The correct answer is B) Spain, as the frozen fish underwent substantial transformation in Spain through cutting, seasoning, battering, pre-frying, and freezing, which qualifies as "manufacture or production" under 19 CFR 134.1(b). Norway is the source of the raw fish but does not qualify as the country of origin because the fish was not "grown" there and the processing in Spain constitutes a substantial transformation. Portugal is not involved in the processing, and Ireland only consolidates the goods without altering their origin. The European Union is not a "country" under 19 CFR 134.1(a), which defines "country" as a political entity known as a nation.
October 2022, Q54. What is the citation in the Code of Federal Regulations for the section requiring that every article of foreign origin, or its container, imported into the United States be marked with the country of origin of the article in a conspicuous place as legible, indelibly, and permanently as the nature of the article, or container, will permit?
- A19 CFR 134.0
- B19 CFR 134.1
- C19 CFR 134.11
- D19 CFR 134.13
- E19 CFR 134.46
Show the answer and explanation
The correct answer is C (19 CFR 134.11) because the cited text explicitly states the requirement for marking the country of origin as mandated by 19 U.S.C. 1304, which is implemented in this section. Options A (19 CFR 134.0) and B (19 CFR 134.1) pertain to general definitions or introductory provisions, not the specific marking rule. Options D (19 CFR 134.13) and E (19 CFR 134.46) address other marking exceptions or requirements unrelated to the core country-of-origin marking obligation. The authority is grounded in 19 CFR 134.11, which directly enforces the statutory mandate.
October 2022, Q55. What are the consequences if the broker, acting as importer for a shipment, takes no action within 30 days on a Notice to Mark / Notice to Redeliver (CBP Form 4647) it received indicating that merchandise contained in the shipment was not properly marked with country of origin? The merchandise was cleared and delivered to the ultimate consignee before the timely CBP Form 4647 was issued.
- AThere are no consequences because the broker has 60 days under the regulations to address whether merchandise is properly marked with country of origin.
- BThere are no consequences because the broker is automatically entitled to a 30-day extension of time to act on a CBP Form 4647.
- CThe consequence is that the merchandise will be sent to general-order stores by CBP for disposition in accordance with Part 127 of the Customs Regulations.
- DThe consequence is that the Center Director will cause liquidated damages in an amount equal to the entered value of the articles not properly marked or redelivered to be issued to the broker under its import bond.
- EThe consequence is that the entry will be change liquidated on the 31st day with a bill to collect the 10 percent additional duty for merchandise not exported or destroyed under Customs supervision.
Show the answer and explanation
The correct answer is D because 19 CFR 134.54(a) mandates that if the importer fails to properly mark or redeliver merchandise within 30 days of the notice, the port director must demand liquidated damages equal to the entered value of the unmarked merchandise, regardless of prior delivery. Options A and B incorrectly assert extended timelines not supported by the regulation, which only allows for a 30-day period with potential extensions at the Center Director’s discretion. Option C is irrelevant as the regulation does not mention disposition in general-order stores. Option E references a 10% additional duty, which is governed by different provisions (e.g., 19 U.S.C. 1304(f)) and not the liquidated damages outlined in 134.54.
October 2022, Q56. Which of the following articles has NOT been legally marked under Part 134 of the Customs Regulations?
- AAn ocean container marked “Container Made in Germany” filled with nuts and bolts manufactured in Taiwan that have not been marked with the country of origin and delivered to an automobile manufacturer in Detroit, Michigan.
- BStandard poker deck playing cards manufactured in China not marked with the country of origin but printed with a U.S. casino logo indicating the city and state of the casino’s location sealed in playing card box marked “Made in China” and imported by the casino.
- CNewly manufactured rugs of traditional Persian design marketed as Persian rugs with a sewn label indicating “Made in Iran” and delivered to a retail carpet store in Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
- DFrozen cod filets imported by Rhode Island Fisheries that are wrapped individually in clear plastic and boxed, twelve filets to a box, with the words “Atlantic Cod” in 36 pt. type on the top center of the box top. Nearby are “Distributed by Rhode Island Fisheries” and “Product of India” also in 36 pt. type.
- EWool yarn in skeins manufactured in Ireland each with a coated paper wrapper showing the brand and details about the yarn with “Finest Irish Wool” on the wrapper imported by Big Box Store.
Show the answer and explanation
The correct answer is E because the wool yarn is marked with "Finest Irish Wool" on the wrapper, which does not explicitly state the country of origin as required by 19 CFR 134.0. While "Irish" refers to Ireland, the marking must clearly indicate the country of origin, and the use of an adjective rather than the country name may not satisfy the requirement for a direct and unambiguous statement of origin. The other options include markings that directly state the country of origin (e.g., "Made in China," "Product of India") or are exempt from marking requirements (e.g., containers, sealed boxes). The marking in E lacks the explicit country name, which is necessary under the regulations.
October 2023, Q62. Which of the following is NOT an exception to the country of origin marking requirements?
- AProducts of the United States exported and returned.
- BArticles produced more than 20 years prior to their importation into the United States.
- CArticles imported for use by the importer and not intended for sale in their imported or any other form.
- DSouvenirs imported marked with "Orlando, FL" but manufactured in China.
Show the answer and explanation
The correct answer is D because 19 CFR 134.47 explicitly requires that souvenirs marked with a U.S. location (e.g., "Orlando, FL") must also be marked with the country of origin (e.g., "Made in China") if the name of a U.S. location appears as part of a souvenir marking. This rule does not exempt such items from country-of-origin marking requirements, making D the only option that fails to qualify as an exception. Options A, B, and C are exceptions under other provisions not detailed in the cited text, but D directly conflicts with the marking rule in 19 CFR 134.47.
October 2024, Q61. Die-cut steel scissors were bolted together and manufactured as completely finished scissors in China, fitted with rubberized non-slip grips handles in Germany, and ultimately imported into the United States. What is the correct country of origin and marking method?
- A"Made in Beijing" printed on a hangtag.
- B"Made in China" printed on a sticker attached to the scissors.
- C"Made in China" die stamped into the scissors.
- D"Made in Germany" printed on a hangtag
Show the answer and explanation
The correct answer is C because the scissors are a class of article listed in 19 CFR 134.43(a), which mandates that they be marked by die stamping, a permanent and legible method. The country of origin is China, as the scissors were completely finished there, and the addition of non-slip grips in Germany does not constitute substantial transformation under 19 CFR 134.11. Options A and D are incorrect because hangtags are not considered permanent or conspicuous enough under 19 CFR 134.43(a). Option B is incorrect because a sticker is not a die-stamped or permanently attached marking as required by the regulation.
CBLEsim is free: every past-exam question CBP has released, the CFR and the HTSUS a tap away, timed mock exams, and tracking that sends you back to what you keep missing.
Start practising free