Title 19 CFR · 34 exam questions
19 CFR Part 10: Articles Conditionally Free, Subject to a Reduced Rate, Etc
19 CFR Part 10, section by section, with every released customs broker license exam question in the CBLEsim bank that tests it. Drawn from 13 released sittings, April 2019 through October 2025.
Edition shown: the 2025 annual edition of Title 19, revised as of April 1, 2025. It is the edition the October 2026 customs broker exam is graded against, and it can differ from the regulation in force today. For the current official text see 19 CFR Part 10 on eCFR.
Sections of Part 10
Part 10 is too long to print whole. Sections the exam has tested open in place or link to their own page; the rest are listed so you can see the shape of the part, and every one of them is in the free reader.
§ 10.1Domestic products; requirements on entry
(a) Except as otherwise provided for in paragraph (g), (h), (i) or (j) of this section or elsewhere in this part or in § 145.35 of this chapter, the following documents must be filed in connection with the entry of articles in a shipment valued over $2,500 and claimed to be free of duty under subheading 9801.00.10 or 9802.00.20, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS):
(1) A declaration by the foreign shipper in substantially the following form:
I, ______________________, declare that to the best of my knowledge and belief the articles herein specified were exported from the United States, from the port of ________________ on or about ________________, 20____, and that they are returned without having been advanced in value or improved in condition by any process of manufacture or other means. Marks Number Quantity Description Value, in U.S. coin (Date) (Signature) (Address) (Capacity)
I, ______________________,
declare that to the best of my knowledge and belief the articles herein specified were exported from the United States, from the port of ________________ on or about ________________, 20____, and that they are returned without having been advanced in value or improved in condition by any process of manufacture or other means.
(2) A declaration by the owner, importer, consignee, or agent having knowledge of the facts regarding the claim for free entry. If the owner or ultimate consignee is a corporation, such declaration may be signed by the president, vice president, secretary, or treasurer of the corporation, or may be signed by any employee or agent of the corporation who holds a power of attorney executed under the conditions outlined in subpart C, part 141 of this chapter and a certification by the corporation that such employee or other agent has or will have knowledge of the pertinent facts. This declaration must be in substantially the following form:
I, ______________, declare that the (above) (attached) declaration by the foreign shipper is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief, that the articles were manufactured by ________________ (name of manufacturer) located in ________________ (city and state), that the articles were not manufactured or produced in the United States under subheading 9813.00.05, HTSUS, and that the articles were exported from the United States without benefit of drawback. (Date) (Address) (Signature) (Capacity)
I, ______________,
declare that the (above) (attached) declaration by the foreign shipper is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief, that the articles were manufactured by ________________ (name of manufacturer) located in ________________ (city and state), that the articles were not manufactured or produced in the United States under subheading 9813.00.05, HTSUS, and that the articles were exported from the United States without benefit of drawback.
(Date)
(Address)
(Signature)
(Capacity)
(b) In any case in which the value of the returned articles exceeds $2,500 and the articles are not clearly marked with the name and address of the U.S. manufacturer, the Center director may require, in addition to the declarations required in paragraph (a) of this section, such other documentation or evidence as may be necessary to substantiate the claim for duty-free treatment. Such other documentation or evidence may include a statement from the U.S. manufacturer verifying that the articles were made in the United States, or a U.S. export invoice, bill of lading or airway bill evidencing the U.S. origin of the articles and/or the reason for the exportation of the articles.
(c) A certificate from the master of a vessel stating that products of the United States are returned without having been unladen from the exporting vessel may be accepted in lieu of the declaration of the foreign shipper required by paragraph (a)(1) of this section.
(d) If the Center director is reasonably satisfied, because of the nature of the articles or production of other evidence, that the articles are imported in circumstances meeting the requirements of subheading 9801.00.10 or 9802.00.20, HTSUS, and related section and additional U.S. notes, he may waive the requirements for producing the documents specified in paragraph (a) of this section.
(e) No evidence relative to the conditions of subheading 9801.00.10, HTSUS, will be required in the case of articles the product of the U.S. in use at the time of importation as the usual coverings or containers of merchandise not subject to an ad valorem rate of duty unless such articles would be dutiable if not products of the U.S. under General Rule of Interpretation 5, HTSUS.
(f) In the case of photographic films and dry plates manufactured in the United States (except motion picture films to be used for commercial purposes) exposed abroad and entered under subheading 9802.00.20, HTSUS, the requirements of paragraphs (a) and (c) of this section are applicable except that the declaration by the foreign shipper provided for in paragraph (a)(1) to the effect that the articles “are returned without having been advanced in value or improved in condition by any process of manufacture or other means” must be crossed out, and the entrant must show on the declaration provided for in paragraph (a)(2) that the subject articles when exported were of U.S. manufacture and are returned after having been exposed, or exposed and developed, and, in the case of motion picture films, that they will not be used for commercial purposes.
(g) Aircraft and aircraft parts and equipment. (1) In the case of aircraft and aircraft parts and equipment returned to the United States under subheading 9801.00.10, HTSUS, by or for the account of an aircraft owner or operator and intended for use in his own aircraft operations, within or outside the United States, the entry summary may be made on CBP Form 3311, or its electronic equivalent. The entry summary on CBP Form 3311, or its electronic equivalent, must be executed by the entrant and supported by the entry documentation required by § 142.3 of this chapter. If the CBP officer is satisfied that the articles are products of the United States, that they have not been improved in condition or advanced in value while abroad, and that no drawback has been or will be paid, the other documents described in this section will not be required, and no bond need be filed for their production.
(2) The entrant must show on CBP Form 3311, or its electronic equivalent:
(i) The name and address of the aircraft owner or operator by whom or for whose account the articles are returned to the United States, in the block headed “Articles Returned To (Name and Address)”,
(ii) The name of the importing vessel or conveyance,
(iii) The date of its arrival,
(iv) A description of the articles,
(v) The value of the articles, and
(vi) That the articles are intended for use by the aircraft owner or operator in his own aircraft operations.
(3) If CBP Form 3311, or its electronic equivalent, is filed at time of entry, it will serve as both the entry and the entry summary.
(h) Nonconsumable vessel stores and equipment. (1) In the case of nonconsumable vessel stores and equipment returned to the United States under subheading 9801.00.10, HTSUS, the entry summary may be made on CBP Form 3311, or its electronic equivalent. The entry summary on CBP Form 3311, or its electronic equivalent, must be executed in duplicate by the entrant and supported by the entry documentation required by § 142.3 of this chapter. Before an entry summary on CBP Form 3311, or its electronic equivalent, may be accepted for nonconsumable vessel stores and equipment, the CBP officer must be satisfied that:
(i) The articles are products of the United States.
(ii) The articles have not been improved in condition or advanced in value while abroad.
(iii) No drawback has been or will be paid, and
(iv) No duty equal to an internal revenue tax is payable under subheading 9801.00.80, HTSUS.
(2) The documentation described in paragraph (a) of this section will not be required in connection with an entry for nonconsumable vessel stores and equipment on CBP Form 3311, or its electronic equivalent.
(3) To satisfy the CBP officer that no drawback has been or will be paid on the articles in connection with their removal from the United States, the master of the vessel or other person having knowledge of the facts must furnish a written declaration which may be made on the reverse side of CBP Form 3311, or its electronic equivalent, showing that the articles were:
(i) Exported as stores or equipment on a United States vessel or a vessel operated by the United States Government,
(ii) Not landed in a foreign country, except for any needed repairs, adjustments, or refilling and return to the vessel from which landed or,
(iii) For transshipment as stores or equipment to another vessel.
(4) The entrant also must show:
(i) The name of the importing vessel,
(ii) The date of its arrival,
(iii) A description of the articles, and
(iv) The value of the articles.
(5) If CBP Form 3311, or its electronic equivalent, is filed at time of entry, it will serve as both the entry and the entry summary.
(i) When the total value of articles of claimed American origin contained in any shipment does not exceed $250 and such articles are found to be unquestionably products of the United States and do not appear to have been advanced in value or improved in condition while abroad and no quota is involved, free entry thereof may be made under subheading 9801.00.10 on CBP Form 3311, or its electronic equivalent, executed by the owner, importer, consignee, or agent and filed in duplicate, without regard to the requirement of filing the documentation provided for in paragraph (a) of this section, unless the CBP officer has reason to believe that Customs drawback or exemption from internal revenue tax, or both, were probably allowed on exportation of the articles or that they are otherwise subject to duty. The entrant must show on Customs Form 3311, or its electronic equivalent, the name of the importing conveyance, the date of its arrival, the name of the country from which the articles were returned to the United States, and the value of the articles. The entrant must also produce evidence of his right to make entry (except as provided in § 141.11(b) of this chapter). If the Customs officer is not entirely certain that the articles to be entered under this paragraph by a nominal consignee are products of the United States, the actual owner or ultimate consignee thereof may be required to execute a Customs Form 3311, or its electronic equivalent.
(j) In the case of products of the United States, when the aggregate value of the shipment does not exceed $10,000 and the products are imported—
(1) For the purposes of repair or alteration, prior to reexportation, or
(2) After having been either rejected or returned by the foreign purchaser to the United States for credit, free entry thereof may be made under subheading 9801.00.10, HTSUS, on CBP Form 3311, or its electronic equivalent, (a CBP Form 7501, or its electronic equivalent, must be submitted as well for such articles as provided in § 143.23(h) of this chapter), executed by the owner, importer, consignee, or agent and filed in duplicate, without regard to the requirement of filing the documentation provided for in paragraph (a) of this section, unless the CBP officer has reason to believe that CBP drawback or exemption from internal revenue tax, or both, were probably allowed on exportation of the articles or that they are otherwise subject to duty. The person making entry must show on CBP Form 3311, or its electronic equivalent, the name of the importing conveyance, the date of its arrival, the name of the country from which the articles were returned to the United States, and the value of the articles. The person making entry must also produce evidence of his right to make entry (except as provided in § 141.11(b) of this chapter). If the CBP officer is not entirely certain that the articles to be entered under this paragraph by a nominal consignee are products of the United States, the actual owner or ultimate consignee thereof may be required to execute a CBP Form 3311, or its electronic equivalent.
Editorial Note:
§ 10.3Drawback; internal-revenue tax
§ 10.4Internal-revenue marks; erasure
§ 10.5Shooks and staves; cloth boards; port director's account
§ 10.6Shooks and staves; claim for duty exemption
§ 10.7Substantial containers or holders
§ 10.8Articles exported for repairs or alterations
(a) Except as otherwise provided for in this section and except in the case of goods covered by § 181.64 of this chapter, the following documents shall be filed in connection with the entry of articles which are returned after having been exported for repairs or alterations and which are claimed to be subject to duty only on the value of the repairs or alterations performed abroad under subheading 9802.00.40 or 9802.00.50, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS):
(1) A declaration from the person who performed such repairs or alterations, in substantially the following form:
I,________________, declare that the articles herein specified are the articles which, in the condition in which they were exported from the United States, were received by me (us) on ________________, 19____, from________________ (name and address of owner or exporter in the United States); that they were received by me (us) for the sole purpose of being repaired or altered; that only the repairs or alterations described below were performed by me (us); that the full cost or (when no charge is made) value of such repairs or alterations are correctly stated below; and that no substitution whatever has been made to replace any of the articles originally received by me (us) from the owner or exporter thereof mentioned above. Marks and numbers Description of articles and of repairs or alterations Full cost or (when no charge is made) value of repairs or alterations (see subchapter II, chapter 98, HTSUS) Total value of articles after repairs or alterations (Date) (Address) (Signature) (Capacity)
I,________________, declare that the articles herein specified are the articles which, in the condition in which they were exported from the United States, were received by me (us) on ________________, 19____, from________________ (name and address of owner or exporter in the United States); that they were received by me (us) for the sole purpose of being repaired or altered; that only the repairs or alterations described below were performed by me (us); that the full cost or (when no charge is made) value of such repairs or alterations are correctly stated below; and that no substitution whatever has been made to replace any of the articles originally received by me (us) from the owner or exporter thereof mentioned above.
(Date)
(Address)
(Signature)
(Capacity)
(2) A declaration by the owner, importer, consignee, or agent having knowledge of the pertinent facts in substantially the following form:
I, __________, declare that the (above) (attached) declaration by the person who performed the repairs or alterations abroad is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief; that the articles were not manufactured or produced in the United States under subheading 9813.00.05, HTSUS; that such articles were exported from the United States for repairs or alterations and without benefit of drawback (unless subject to USMCA drawback) from ________________ (port) on ________________, 19____; and that the articles entered in their repaired or altered condition are the same articles that were exported on the above date and that are identified in the (above) (attached) declaration. (Date) (Address) (Signature) (Capacity)
I, __________,
declare that the (above) (attached) declaration by the person who performed the repairs or alterations abroad is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief; that the articles were not manufactured or produced in the United States under subheading 9813.00.05, HTSUS; that such articles were exported from the United States for repairs or alterations and without benefit of drawback (unless subject to USMCA drawback) from ________________ (port) on ________________, 19____; and that the articles entered in their repaired or altered condition are the same articles that were exported on the above date and that are identified in the (above) (attached) declaration.
(Date)
(Address)
(Signature)
(Capacity)
(b) The Center director may require such additional documentation as is deemed necessary to prove actual exportation of the articles from the United States for repairs or alterations, such as a foreign customs entry, foreign customs invoice, foreign landing certificate, bill of lading, or an airway bill.
(c) If the Center director concerned is satisfied, because of the nature of the articles or production of other evidence, that the articles are imported under circumstances meeting the requirements of subheading 9802.00.40 or 9802.00.50, HTSUS, and related section and additional U.S. notes, he may waive submission of the declarations provided for in paragraph (a) of this section.
(d) The port director or Center director shall require at the time of entry a deposit of estimated duties based upon the full cost or value of the repairs or alterations. The cost or value of the repairs or alterations outside the United States, which is to be set forth in the invoice and entry papers as the basis for the assessment of duty under subheading 9802.00.40 or 9802.00.50, HTSUS, shall be limited to the cost or value of the repairs or alterations actually performed abroad, which will include all domestic and foreign articles furnished for the repairs or alterations but shall not include any of the expenses incurred in this country whether by way of engineering costs, preparation of plans or specifications, furnishing of tools or equipment for doing the repairs or alterations abroad, or otherwise.
§ 10.8aImported articles exported and reimported
§ 10.9Articles exported for processing
§ 10.11General
§ 10.12Definitions
§ 10.13Statutory provision: Subheading 9802.00.80, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (19 U.S.C. 1202)
§ 10.14Fabricated components subject to the exemption
§ 10.15Fabricated components not subject to the exemption
§ 10.16Assembly abroad
(a) Assembly operations. The assembly operations performed abroad may consist of any method used to join or fit together solid components, such as welding, soldering, riveting, force fitting, gluing, laminating, sewing, or the use of fasteners, and may be preceded, accompanied, or followed by operations incidental to the assembly as illustrated in paragraph (b) of this section. The mixing or combining of liquids, gases, chemicals, food ingredients, and amorphous solids with each other or with solid components is not regarded as an assembly.
Example 1.
Example 2.
Example 3.
(b) Operations incidental to the assembly process. Operations incidental to the assembly process whether performed before, during, or after assembly, do not constitute further fabrication, and will not preclude the application of the exemption. The following are examples of operations which are incidental to the assembly process:
(1) Cleaning;
(2) Removal of rust, grease, paint, or other preservative coating;
(3) Application of paint or preservative coating, including preservative metallic coating, lubricants, or protective encapsulation;
(4) Trimming, filing, or cutting off of small amounts of excess materials;
(5) Adjustments in the shape or form of a component to the extent required by the assembly being performed abroad;
(6) Cutting to length of wire, thread, tape, foil, and similar products exported in continuous length; separation by cutting of finished components, such as prestamped integrated circuit lead frames exported in multiple unit strips; and
(7) Final calibration, testing, marking, sorting, pressing, and folding of assembled articles.
(c) Operations not incidental to the assembly process. Any significant process, operation, or treatment other than assembly whose primary purpose is the fabrication, completion, physical or chemical improvement of a component, or which is not related to the assembly process, whether or not it effects a substantial transformation of the article, will not be regarded as incidental to the assembly and will preclude the application of the exemption to such article. The following are examples of operations not considered incidental to the assembly as provided under subheading 9802.00.80, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (19 U.S.C. 1202):
(1) Melting of exported ingots and pouring of the metal into molds to produce cast metal parts;
(2) Cutting of garment parts according to pattern from exported material;
(3) Chemical treatment of components or assembled articles to impart new characteristics, such as showerproofing, permapressing, sanforizing, dying or bleaching of textiles;
(4) Machining, polishing, burnishing, peening, plating (other than plating incidental to the assembly), embossing, pressing, stamping, extruding, drawing, annealing, tempering, case hardening, and any other operation, treatment or process which imparts significant new characteristics or qualities to the article affected.
(d) Joining of American-made and foreign-made components. An assembly operation may involve the use of American-made components and foreign-made components. The various requirements for establishing entitlement to the exemption apply only to the American-made components of the assembly.
Example.
(e) Subassembly. An assembly operation may involve the joining or fitting of American-made components into a part or subassembly of an article, followed by the installation of the part or subassembly into the complete article.
Example.
(f) Packing. The packing abroad of merchandise into containers does not in itself qualify either the containers or their contents for the exemption. However, assembled articles which otherwise qualify for the exemption and which are packaged abroad following their assembly will not be disqualified from the exemption by reason of their having been so packaged, whether for retail sale or for bulk shipment. The tariff status of the packing materials or containers will be determined in accordance with General Rule of Interpretation 5, HTSUS (19 U.S.C. 1202).
§ 10.17Valuation of exempted components
§ 10.18Valuation of assembled articles
§ 10.21Updating cost data and other information
§ 10.23Standards, quotas, and visas
§ 10.24Documentation
§ 10.25Textile components cut to shape in the United States and assembled abroad
§ 10.26Articles assembled or processed in a beneficiary country in whole of U.S. components or ingredients; articles assembled in a beneficiary country from textile components cut to shape in the United States
§ 10.31Entry; bond · full text and 6 exam questions
§ 10.33Theatrical effects
§ 10.35Models of women's wearing apparel
§ 10.36Commercial travelers' samples; professional equipment and tools of trade; theatrical effects and other articles
§ 10.36aVehicles, pleasure boats and aircraft brought in for repair or alteration
§ 10.37Extension of time for exportation
The period of time during which merchandise entered under bond under chapter 98, subchapter XIII, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (19 U.S.C. 1202), may remain in the customs territory of the United States, may be extended for not more than two further periods of 1 year each, or such shorter period as may be appropriate. Extensions may be granted by the Center director upon written application on CBP form 3173, which may be submitted to CBP, either at the port of entry or electronically provided the articles have not been exported or destroyed before the receipt of the application, and liquidated damages have not been assessed under the bond before receipt of the application. Any untimely request for an extension of time for exportation shall be referred to the Director, Commercial and Trade Facilitation Division, Office of International Trade, CBP Headquarters, for disposition. Any request for relief from a liquidated damage assessment in excess of a Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer's delegated authority shall be referred to the Director, Border Security and Trade Compliance Division, Office of International Trade, CBP Headquarters, for disposition. No extension of the period for which a carnet is valid shall be granted.
§ 10.38Exportation
(a) Articles entered under chapter 98, subchapter XIII, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) (19 U.S.C. 1202) may be exported at the port of entry or at another port. An application on Customs Form 3495 shall be filed in duplicate with the port director a sufficient length of time in advance of exportation to permit the examination and identification of the articles if circumstances warrant such action and, in such event, the applicant shall be notified on a copy of Customs Form 3495 where the articles are to be sent for identification. If a carnet was used for entry purposes, the reexportation voucher of the carnet shall be filed, in addition to Customs Form 3495, and the carnet shall be presented for certification.
(b) All expenses in connection with the delivery of the articles for examination, the cording and sealing of such articles, and their transfer for exportation shall be paid by the parties in interest.
(c) If exportation is to be made at a port other than the one at which the merchandise was entered, the application on Customs Form 3495 shall be filed in triplicate. There shall also be filed with the application a certified copy of the import entry or a certified copy of the invoice used on entry.
(d) If the goods are examined at one port and are to be exported from another port, they shall be forwarded to the port of exportation under a transportation and exportation entry. In such cases Customs Form 3495 shall be filed in triplicate. Articles entered under a carnet shall not be examined elsewhere than at the port from which they are to be exported.
(e) If the articles are to be exported by mail or parcel post, the package containing the articles must be mailed under Customs supervision after examination. Waiver of the right to withdraw the package from the mails shall be endorsed on each package to be so exported and signed by the exporter.
(f) Whenever the circumstances warrant, and occasionally in any event, port directors shall cause the fact of exportation to be verified by the Office of Enforcement in harmony with the procedures provided for in §§ 18.7 and 191.61 of this chapter.
(g) Upon the presentation of satisfactory evidence to the director of the port at which samples were entered under subheading 9813.00.20, HTSUS, or professional equipment or tools of trade were entered under subheading 9813.00.50, HTSUS, that such articles cannot be exported for the reason that they have been seized (other than by seizure at the suit of private persons), the requirement of exportation shall be suspended for the duration of the seizure. The articles shall be exported promptly after release from seizure.
§ 10.39Cancellation of bond charges
(a) Charges against bonds taken pursuant to Chapter 98, Subchapter XIII, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, (HTSUS), may be canceled in the manner prescribed in § 113.55 of this chapter. A completed reexportation counterfoil on a carnet establishes that the articles covered by the carnet have been exported, and no claim shall be brought against the guaranteeing association under the carnet for failure to export, except under the provisions of § 114.26 of this chapter. In the case of articles entered under subheading 9813.00.30, HTSUS, which are destroyed because of their use for the purposes of importation, the bond charge shall not be canceled unless there is submitted to the Center director a certificate of the importer that the articles were destroyed during the course of a specifically described use, and the Center director is satisfied that the articles were so destroyed as articles of commerce within the period of time during which the articles may remain in the Customs territory of the United States under bond (including any lawful extension). Bonds covering articles entered under other provisions of law shall not be canceled upon proof of destruction, except as provided for in paragraph (c) of this section, unless the articles are destroyed under Customs supervision in accordance with section 557, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and § 158.43 of this chapter.
(b) Where exportation has been made at a port other than the port of entry, the bond may be canceled upon the certificate of lading received from the port of exportation, showing that such exportation was made within the period of time during which the articles may remain in the Customs territory of the United States under bond. In addition, the Center director may require the production of a landing certificate signed by a revenue officer of the country to which the merchandise is exported.
(c) When articles entered temporarily free of duty under bond are destroyed within the bond period by death, accidental fire, or other casualty, petition for relief from liability under the bond shall be made to the United States Customs Service. The petition shall be accompanied by a statement of the importer, or other person having knowledge of the facts, setting forth the circumstances of the destruction of the articles.
(d)(1) If any article entered under Chapter 98, subchapter XIII, HTSUS, except those entered under a carnet, has not been exported or destroyed in accordance with the regulations in this part within the period of time during which the articles may remain in the Customs territory of the United States under bond (including any lawful extension), the Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer shall make a demand in writing under the bond for the payment of liquidated damages equal to double the estimated duties applicable to such entry, unless a different amount is prescribed by § 10.31(f). The demand shall include a statement that a written petition for relief from the payment of the full liquidated damages may be filed with the Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer within 60 days after the date of the demand. For purposes of this section, the term estimated duties shall include any merchandise processing fees applicable to such entry.
(2) If articles entered under a carnet have not been exported or destroyed in accordance with the regulations in this part within the carnet period, the port director shall promptly after expiration of that period make demand in writing upon the importer and guaranteeing association for the payment of liquidated damages in the amount of 110 percent of the estimated duties on the articles not exported or destroyed. The guaranteeing association shall have a period of 6 months from the date of claim in which to furnish proof of the exportation or destruction of the articles under conditions set forth in the Convention or Agreement under which the carnet is issued. If such proof is not furnished within the 6-month period, the guaranteeing association shall forthwith pay the liquidated damages provided for above. The payment shall be refunded if the guaranteeing association within 3 months from the date of payment furnishes the proof referred to above. No claim for payment under a carnet covering a temporary importation may be made against the guaranteeing association more than 1 year after the expiration of the period for which the carnet was valid.
(3) Demand for return to Customs custody. When the demand for return to Customs custody is made in the case of merchandise entered under Chapter 98, subchapter XIII, HTSUS (19 U.S.C. 1202), liquidated damages in an amount equal to double the estimated duties on the merchandise not returned shall be demanded, except that in the case of samples solely for use in taking orders, motion-picture advertising films, professional equipment, tools of trade, and repair components for professional equipment and tools of trade, the liquidated damages demanded shall be in an amount equal to 110 percent of the estimated duties.
(e) If there has been a default with respect to any or all of the articles covered by the bond and a written petition for relief is filed as provided in part 172 of this chapter, it will be reviewed by the Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer having jurisdiction in the port where the entry was filed. If the Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer is satisfied that the importation was properly entered under Chapter 98, subchapter XIII, and that there was no intent to defraud the revenue or delay the payment of duty, the Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer may cancel the liability for the payment of liquidated damages in any case in his or her delegated authority as follows:
(1) If evidence is furnished which satisfies the Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer that the article would have been entitled to free entry as domestic products exported and returned had the evidence been furnished at the time of entry, without the collection of liquidated damages.
(2) If the article has been exported or destroyed under Customs supervision but not within the period of time during which the articles may remain in the Customs territory of the United States under bond, upon the payment of such lesser amount as the port director may deem appropriate under the law and in view of the circumstances, or without the collection of liquidated damages if the Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer is satisfied that the delay in exportation or destruction was for the benefit of the United States or was occasioned wholly by circumstances reasonably beyond the control of the parties concerned and which could not have been anticipated by a reasonably prudent person.
(3) If the article was exported or destroyed within the period of time during which the articles may remain in the Customs territory of the United States under bond but not under Customs supervision and satisfactory documentary evidence of actual exportation, such as a foreign landing certificate, or of death or other complete destruction, such as a veterinarian's certificate or certificates of two disinterested witnesses, are furnished together with a complete explanation by the applicant of the failure to obtain Customs supervision, upon the payment of such lesser amount as the Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer may deem appropriate under the law and in view of the circumstances, or without the collection of liquidated damages if the port director is satisfied that the merchandise was destroyed under circumstances which precluded any arrangement to obtain Customs supervision. Satisfactory documentary evidence of exportation, in the case of carnets, would include the particulars regarding importation or reimportation entered in the carnet by the Customs authorities of another contracting party, or a certificate with respect to importation or reimportation issued by those authorities, based on the particulars shown on a voucher which was detached from the carnet on importation or reimportation into their territory, provided it is shown that the importation or reimportation took place after the exportation which it is intended to establish.
(4) Upon the payment of an amount equal to double the duty which would have accrued on the articles had they been entered under an ordinary consumption entry, or equal to 110 percent of such duties where that percentage is prescribed in § 10.31(f), if such amount is determined to be less than the full amount of the bond.
(f) Anticipatory breach. If an importer anticipates that the merchandise entered under a Temporary Importation Bond will not be exported or destroyed in accordance with the terms of the bond, the importer may indicate to Customs in writing before the bond period has expired of the anticipatory breach. At the time of written notification of the breach, the importer shall pay to Customs the full amount of liquidated damages that would be assessed at the time of breach of the bond, and the entry will be closed. The importer shall notify the surety in writing of the breach and payment. By this payment, the importer waives his right to receive a notice of claim for liquidated damages as required by § 172.1(a) of this chapter.
(g) If the petitioner is not satisfied with the port director's action under this section and submits a supplemental petition, both the original and the supplemental petitions shall be transmitted to the designated Headquarters official with a full report on the case.
Editorial Note:
§ 10.40Refund of cash deposits
§ 10.41Instruments; exceptions
§ 10.41aLift vans, cargo vans, shipping tanks, skids, pallets, and similar instruments of international traffic; repair components
(a)(1) Lift vans, cargo vans, shipping tanks, skids, pallets, caul boards, and cores for textile fabrics, arriving (whether loaded or empty) in use or to be used in the shipment of merchandise in international traffic are hereby designated as “instruments of international traffic” within the meaning of section 322(a), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended. The Commissioner of Customs is authorized to designate as instruments of international traffic, in decisions to be published in the weekly Customs Bulletin, such additional articles or classes of articles as he shall find should be so designated. Such instruments may be released without entry or the payment of duty, subject to the provisions of this section.
(2) Repair components, accessories, and equipment for any container of foreign production which is an instrument of international traffic may be entered or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption without the deposit of duty if the person making the entry or withdrawal from warehouse files a declaration that the repair component was imported to be used in the repair of a container of foreign production which is an instrument of international traffic, or that the accessory or equipment is for a container of foreign production which is an instrument of international traffic. The Center director must be satisfied that the importer of the repair component, accessory, or equipment had the declared intention at the time of importation.
(3) As used in this section, “instruments of international traffic” includes the normal accessories and equipment imported with any such instrument which is a “container” as defined in Article 1 of the Customs Convention on Containers.
(b) The reexportation of a container, as defined in Article 1 of the Customs Convention on Containers, which has become badly damaged, shall not be required in the case of a duly authenticated accident if the container (1) is subjected to applicable import duties and import taxes, or (2) is abandoned free of all expense to the Government or destroyed under Customs supervision at the expense of the parties concerned, following the procedure outlined in § 158.43(c) of this chapter. Any salvaged parts and materials shall be subjected to applicable import duties and import taxes. Replaced parts which are not reexported shall be subjected to import duties and import taxes except where abandoned free of expense to the Government or destroyed under Customs supervision at the expense of the parties concerned.
(c) The instruments of international traffic designated in paragraph (a) of this section may be released in accordance with the provisions of that paragraph only after the applicant for such release has filed a bond on Customs Form 301, containing the bond conditions set forth in § 113.66 of this chapter. The required application may be filed at the port of arrival or at a subsequent port to which an instrument shall have been transported in bond or to which a container shall have been moved under cover of a TIR carnet (see part 114 of this chapter) showing the characteristics and value of the container on the Goods Manifest of the carnet. If the container is listed on the Goods Manifest of the carnet, the application may be filed at the port of arrival or at the subsequent port. If the container is not listed on the Goods Manifest, the application shall be filed at the port of arrival. When the application is filed at a port other than the port at which the bond is on file, the following procedure applies:
(1) When the application is filed before the fact of approval of the applicant's bond has been established, the applicant must submit with the application, or the Customs officer to whom the application is made must obtain, evidence that a current bond is on file at another port. That evidence may consist of a certified copy of the bond, or any other evidence which will satisfy the Customs officer to whom the application is made that a current bond is on file at another port.
(2) If the application is filed after the fact of approval of the applicant's bond has been established, a certified copy of that bond need not be filed at the port of release. Upon determination by the appropriate Customs officer that the fact of approval of the applicant's bond has been established, and the bond has not been subsequently discontinued, the instruments of international traffic will be released as provided for in paragraph (a) of this section.
(3) Upon the request of the applicant, the appropriate Customs officer at the port at which the instruments of international traffic are to be released will determine whether or not the fact of approval of the applicant's bond has been established. If the approval has not been established, the Customs officer with whom the application has been filed will advise the applicant of the nature of the evidence required to establish the fact that a current bond is on file at another port.
(d) If an instrument of foreign origin, or of United States origin which has been increased in value or improved in condition by a process of manufacture or other means while abroad, is released under this section and is subsequently diverted to point-to-point local traffic within the United States, or is otherwise withdrawn in the United States from its use as an instrument of international traffic, it becomes subject to entry and the payment of any applicable duties. An instrument of United States origin which has not been increased in value or improved in condition by a process of manufacture or other means while abroad and which is released under this section shall not be subject to entry or the payment of duty if it is so diverted or otherwise withdrawn.
(e) The person who filed the application for release under paragraph (a)(1) of this section shall promptly notify a director of a port of entry in the United States as defined in Section 401(k), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, (1) that the container is to be abandoned or destroyed, as described in paragraph (b) of this section, or (2) that the instrument is the subject of a diversion or withdrawal as described in paragraph (d) of this section, in which event he shall file with CBP, either at the port of entry or electronically a consumption entry for the instrument and pay all import duties and import taxes due on the container or instrument at the rate or rates in effect and in its condition on the date of such diversion or withdrawal.
(f)(1) Except as provided in paragraph (j) of this section, an instrument of international traffic (other than a container as defined in Article 1 of the Customs Convention on Containers that is governed by paragraphs (g) (1)-(3) of this section) may be used as follows in point-to-point traffic, provided such traffic is incidental to the efficient and economical utilization of the instrument in the course of its use in international traffic:
(i) Picking up and delivering loads at intervening points in the United States while en route between the port of arrival and the point of destination of its imported cargo; or
(ii) Picking up and delivering loads at intervening points in the United States while en route from the point of destination of imported cargo to a point where export cargo is to be loaded or to an exterior port of departure by a reasonably direct route to, or nearer to, the place of such loading or departure.
(2) Neither use as enumerated in paragraph (f)(1)(i) or (ii) of this section constitutes a diversion to unpermitted point-to-point local traffic within the United States or a withdrawal of an instrument in the United States from its use as an instrument of international traffic under this section.
(g)(1) Except as provided in paragraph (j) of this section, a container (as defined in Article 1 of the Customs Convention on Containers) that is designated as an instrument of international traffic is deemed to remain in international traffic provided that the container exits the United States within 365 days of the date on which it was admitted under this section. A container that is designated as an instrument of international traffic and admitted from Canada or Mexico is deemed to remain in international traffic beyond this 365-day time limit when CBP grants an extension, at the request of the person who filed the application for release under paragraph (a)(1) of this section, provided that the container exits the United States prior to the date of expiration of the extension granted. An exit from the United States in this context means a movement across the border of the United States into a foreign country where either:
(i) All merchandise is unladen from the container; or
(ii) Merchandise is laden aboard the container (if the container is empty).
(2) The person who filed the application for release under paragraph (a)(1) of this section is responsible for keeping and maintaining such records, otherwise generated and retained in the ordinary course of business, as may be necessary to establish the international movements of the containers. Such records shall be made available for inspection by Customs officials upon reasonable notice.
(3) If the container does not exit the United States within 365 days of the date on which it is admitted under this section, or, by the date on which an extension granted under paragraph (g)(1) of this section expires, such container shall be considered to have been removed from international traffic, and entry for consumption must be made within 10 business days after the end of the month in which the container is deemed removed from international traffic. When entry is required under this section, any containers considered removed from international traffic in the same month may be listed on one entry. Such entry may be made at any port of entry. Under 19 U.S.C. 1484(a)(1)(B), the importer of record is required, using reasonable care, to complete the entry by filing with CBP the declared value, classification and rate of duty applicable to the merchandise. The importer of record must use the value of the container as determined in accordance with section 402, Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1401a), as amended by the Trade Agreements Act of 1979 (TAA).
(h) For failure promptly to report the diversion or withdrawal or promptly to make the required entry and pay the duties due, the applicant shall be liable for the payment of liquidated damages equal to the domestic value of the instrument established in accordance with Section 606, Tariff Act of 1930.
(i) When an instrument of international traffic, as provided in paragraph (a) of this section, is returned to the United States and released in accordance with the provisions of that paragraph, any repairs which may have been made to the instrument while it was abroad are not subject to entry or the payment of duty whether the instrument is of foreign or domestic manufacture, whether it left the United States empty or loaded, and whether or not the repairs made abroad were in contemplation when the instrument left the United States.
(j) Containers and other articles designated as instruments of international traffic in accordance with this section are nevertheless subject to the application of the coastwise laws of the United States, with particular reference to Section 883, Title 46, United States Code (see § 4.93 of this chapter).
Editorial Note:
§ 10.41bClearance of serially numbered substantial holders or outer containers
§ 10.43Duty-free status
§ 10.46Articles for the United States
§ 10.48Engravings, sculptures, etc
§ 10.49Articles for exhibition; requirements on entry
§ 10.52Painted, colored or stained glass windows for religious institutions
§ 10.53Antiques
(a) Articles accompanying a passenger and entitled to entry under the passenger's declaration and entry, or articles entered under an informal entry which are claimed to be free of duty under subheading 9706.00.00, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), may be admitted free of duty upon the execution of a declaration on the face of the entry, or its electronic equivalent, provided that the passenger or person filing the informal entry is the owner of the articles and that they are for his personal use and not for sale or other commercial use and provided the Customs officer concerned is satisfied that the articles are of the requisite age.
(b) Antiques of the age prescribed by subheading 9706.00.00, HTSUS, or admitted under the provisions of paragraph (e) of this section, shall be admitted free of duty though repaired or renovated. If, however, an antique has been repaired with a substantial amount of additional material, without changing the original form or shape, the original and added portions shall be appraised and reported as separate entities and the basis for such report shall be plainly indicated on the invoice by the appraiser. In such cases duty shall be assessed on the portion added. If the repairs consist of an addition to an article of a feature which changes it substantially from the article originally produced, or if the antique portion has otherwise been so changed as to lose its identity as the article which was in existence prior to the time prescribed in subheading 9706.00.00, HTSUS, the entire article shall be excluded from free entry under subheading 9706.00.00, HTSUS.
(c) Except for furniture admitted under the provisions of paragraph (e) of this section, furniture claimed to be free of duty under subheading 9706.00.00, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) may be entered for consumption at any port of entry within the customs territory of the United States. Furniture as used in this section of the regulations is defined as ‘movable articles of convenience or decoration for use in furnishing a house, apartment, place of business or accommodation’. This definition embraces most articles claimed to be free of duty as antiques.
(d) A claim for the free entry of an article under subheading 9706.00.00, HTSUS on the basis of antiquity may be made on the entry, or filed after entry at any time prior to liquidation of the entry, provided the article has not been released from Customs custody or it has been found upon examination before such release to be described in subheading 9706.00.00, HTSUS.
(e) Antique articles otherwise prohibited entry by the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1521, et seq.) may be entered if:
(1) The article is composed in whole or in part of any endangered or threatened species listed in 50 CFR 17.11 or 17.12,
(2) The article is not less than 100 years of age,
(3) The article has not been repaired or modified with any part of any such endangered or threatened species, on or after December 28, 1973,
(4) The article is entered at a port designated in § 12.26 of this chapter,
(5) A Declaration for Importation or Exportation of Fish or Wildlife (USFWS Form 3-177, or its electronic equivalent) is filed at the time of entry with the port director who will forward the form to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and
(6) The importer meets the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section.
(f) The additional duty imposed by additional U.S. Note 2, Chapter 97, HTSUS, shall apply to any article which is imported for sale and claimed, either at the time of entry or at a later date, to be free of duty under subheading 9706.00.00, HTSUS, if such article is later found to be unauthentic in respect of the antiquity claimed as a basis for such free entry, unless the claim under subheading 9706.00.00, HTSUS, is withdrawn in writing before the examination of the article for the purpose of appraisement or classification has begun.
(g) The additional duty provided for in additional U.S. Note 2, Chapter 97, HTSUS shall not be assessed if the importer established by evidence satisfactory to the Center director that the article was not imported for sale. In the case of any article imported in a passenger's baggage or entered under an informal entry, the Customs officer concerned may accept the statement of the owner that the article was not imported for sale if he is satisfied of the truth of such statement.
Editorial Note:
§ 10.54Gobelin and other hand-woven tapestries
§ 10.56Vegetable oils, denaturing; release
§ 10.57Certified seed potatoes, and seed corn or maize
§ 10.58Bolting cloths; marking
§ 10.59Exemption from customs duties and internal-revenue tax
§ 10.60Forms of withdrawals; bond
(a) Withdrawals from warehouse shall be made on CBP Form 7501. Each withdrawal must contain the statement prescribed for withdrawals in § 144.32 of this chapter and all of the statistical information as provided in § 141.61(e) of this chapter. Withdrawals from continuous CBP custody elsewhere than in a bonded warehouse must be made by filing an in-bond application pursuant to part 18 of this chapter, except as provided for by paragraph (h) of this section. When a withdrawal of supplies or other articles is made which may be used on a vessel while it is proceeding in ballast to another port as provided for by § 10.59(a)(3), a notation of this fact shall be made on the withdrawal and the name of the other port given if known.
(b) If the withdrawal is made by other than the principal on the warehouse or rewarehouse entry, as the case may be, the assent of such principal shall be endorsed on the withdrawal, unless the principal has otherwise authorized such withdrawal in writing.
(c) A bond on Customs Form 301, containing the bond conditions set forth in § 113.62 of this chapter shall be taken when the withdrawal from warehouse is made by a person other than the principal on the warehouse or rewarehouse entry, as provided for in paragraph (b) of this section.
(d) Except as otherwise provided in § 10.62b, relating to withdrawals from warehouse of aircraft turbine fuel to be used within 30 days of such withdrawal as supplies on aircraft under section 309, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, when the supplies are to be laden at a port other than the port of withdrawal from warehouse, they shall be withdrawn for transportation in bond to the port of lading by filing an in-bond application pursuant to part 18 of this chapter. The procedure shall be the same as that prescribed in 144.37 of this chapter.
(e) No bond shall be required in the case of war vessels.
(f) Unless transfer is permitted under the provisions of paragraph (h) of this section, when articles are withdrawn from continuous Customs custody elsewhere than in a bonded warehouse for lading at the port of withdrawal, the procedure provided for in § 18.25 of this chapter shall be followed. Unless transfer is permitted under the provisions of paragraph (h) of this section, when articles are withdrawn from continuous Customs custody elsewhere than in a bonded warehouse for lading at another port, the procedure set forth in § 18.26 of this chapter shall be followed. There shall be such examination of the articles as may be necessary to satisfy the port director that they are subject to the privileges of section 309, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and that the value and quantity declared for them are correct.
(g) A withdrawal under § 10.59(e) shall be supported by a bond on Customs Form 301, containing the bond conditions set forth in § 113.62 of this chapter.
(h) If a request is made for permission to transfer supplies or stores from one vessel to another which would be entitled to withdraw them free of duty and tax under section 309 or 317, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, the port director in his discretion may permit the articles to be so transferred under Customs supervision under a permit on Customs Form 3171 in lieu of a formal withdrawal under the pertinent statute. In such a case, the pertinent statute shall be indicated by an endorsement made on the permit by the port director.
§ 10.61Withdrawal permit
§ 10.62Bunker fuel oil
§ 10.62aBlanket withdrawals for certain merchandise
§ 10.62bAircraft turbine fuel
§ 10.63Landing of supplies and stores from receiving vessel in the United States
§ 10.64Crediting or cancellation of bonds
§ 10.65Cigars and cigarettes
§ 10.66Articles exported for temporary exhibition and returned; horses exported for horse racing and returned; procedure on entry
§ 10.67Articles exported for scientific or educational purposes and returned; procedure on entry
§ 10.68Procedure
§ 10.69Samples to Great Britain and Ireland under reciprocal agreement
§ 10.70Purebred animals for breeding purposes; certificate
§ 10.71Purebred animals; bond for production of evidence; deposit of estimated duties; stipulation
§ 10.74Animals straying across boundary for pasturage; offspring
§ 10.75Wild animals and birds; zoological collections
§ 10.76Game animals and birds
§ 10.78Entry
§ 10.80Remission of duty; withdrawal; bond
§ 10.81Use in any port
§ 10.83Bond; cancellation; extension
§ 10.84Automotive vehicles and articles for use as original equipment in the manufacture of automotive vehicles
(a)(1) Certain motor vehicles and motor vehicle equipment are eligible for duty-free entry as proclaimed by the President under the Automotive Products Trade Act of 1965. The articles designated for such duty-free treatment are defined in General Note 3(c)(iii), HTSUS (19 U.S.C. 1202). Specifically, such articles are those designated [as “Free (B)”] in the “Special” subcolumn in Chapter 87, HTSUS, and must qualify as “Canadian articles” as defined in General Note 3(c)(iii)(A)(1), HTSUS. To claim exemption from duty under the Automotive Products Trade Act of 1965, an importer must establish, to the satisfaction of the appropriate Customs officer, that the article in question qualifies as a “Canadian article” for purposes of General Note 3(c)(iii)A)(1), HTSUS. The Customs officer may accept as satisfactory evidence a certificate executed by the exporter as set forth in paragraph (b) of this section, subject to any verification he may deem necessary. Alternatively, the Customs officer may determine that under the circumstances of the importation a certificate is unnecessary.
(2) Under the United States-Canada Free-Trade Agreement and implementing legislation (Pub. L. 100-449, 102 Stat. 1851) a manufacturer of motor vehicles may elect to average, over its 12-month financial year, its calculation of the value-content requirement for vehicles in establishing its eligibility for tariff preference. Requirements for averaging are set forth in §§ 10.310 and 10.311.
(b)(1) When all materials used at any stage in the production of the imported article are wholly obtained or produced in Canada or the United States, or both, a certificate, or its electronic equivalent, in the following form may be accepted as evidence that the commodity is a “Canadian article”:
All materials contained in the product covered by the __________ (Describe the invoice, bill of lading, or other document or statement identifying the shipment) annexed or appended to this certificate of Canadian origin at the time it was subscribed were wholly obtained or produced in Canada or the United States, or both. No materials other than those which were wholly obtained or produced in Canada or the United States, or both, were incorporated into this product or any of its components at any stage of production or in the production of any intermediate product used at any stage in the chain of production in Canada or the United States, or both.
All materials contained in the product covered by the __________ (Describe the invoice, bill of lading, or other document or statement identifying the shipment) annexed or appended to this certificate of Canadian origin at the time it was subscribed were wholly obtained or produced in Canada or the United States, or both. No materials other than those which were wholly obtained or produced in Canada or the United States, or both, were incorporated into this product or any of its components at any stage of production or in the production of any intermediate product used at any stage in the chain of production in Canada or the United States, or both.
(2) When any material used at any stage in the production of an imported article or any of its components is not wholly obtained or produced in Canada or the United States, or both, a certificate, or its electronic equivalent, in the following form may be accepted as evidence that the commodity is nevertheless a “Canadian article”:
The product covered by the __________ (Describe the invoice, bill of lading, or other document or statement identifying the shipment) annexed or appended to this certificate of Canadian origin at the time it was subscribed is an originating good so as to be a Canadian article. There were used in its production in Canada __________ (Description sufficient for tariff classification of the materials, and number of units) of third country materials of which the price paid was __________ per unit of quantity, plus __________ which represents all costs incurred in transporting the materials to the location of the producer and the duties, taxes, and brokerage fees on the materials, if such costs were not included in the price paid.
The product covered by the __________ (Describe the invoice, bill of lading, or other document or statement identifying the shipment) annexed or appended to this certificate of Canadian origin at the time it was subscribed is an originating good so as to be a Canadian article. There were used in its production in Canada __________ (Description sufficient for tariff classification of the materials, and number of units) of third country materials of which the price paid was __________ per unit of quantity, plus __________ which represents all costs incurred in transporting the materials to the location of the producer and the duties, taxes, and brokerage fees on the materials, if such costs were not included in the price paid.
(3) If such Customs officer is satisfied that the revenue will be protected adequately thereby, he may accept in lieu of the certificate specified in paragraph (b)(2) of this section a certificate, or its electronic equivalent, in the following form when the merchandise covered thereby has been produced with third country material but is an originating good under a specific rule of origin for the merchandise:
The product covered by the __________ (Describe the invoice, bill of lading, or other document or statement identifying the shipment) annexed or appended to this certificate of Canadian origin at the time it was subscribed is an originating good so as to be a Canadian article. There were or may have been used in its production in Canada or the United States, or both, materials of a third country. It is impractical to ascertain the exact number of units of third country material, if any, used in its production or the price paid (and other costs required to be included in the price paid) of such materials but to the best of (my) (our) (its) knowledge the materials are described (sufficient for tariff classification purposes) as follows: __________.
The product covered by the __________ (Describe the invoice, bill of lading, or other document or statement identifying the shipment) annexed or appended to this certificate of Canadian origin at the time it was subscribed is an originating good so as to be a Canadian article. There were or may have been used in its production in Canada or the United States, or both, materials of a third country.
It is impractical to ascertain the exact number of units of third country material, if any, used in its production or the price paid (and other costs required to be included in the price paid) of such materials but to the best of (my) (our) (its) knowledge the materials are described (sufficient for tariff classification purposes) as follows: __________.
(4) The certificates described in paragraphs (b)(2) and (b)(3) of this section, or their electronic equivalents, shall not be accepted if the statements therein make it evident that the importation is not a “Canadian article” within the meaning of General Note 3(c), HTSUS.
(5) If more than one kind of article is covered by a certificate provided for in paragraph (b) (1), (2), or (3) of this section, the information required by the certificate shall be shown with respect to each kind. When more than one kind of material, other than originating material, is used in the production of an article covered by such a certificate, the certificate shall state the number of units, a description sufficient for tariff classification purposes, the price paid, and, if not included in the price paid, the costs incurred in transporting the materials to the location of the producer and duties, taxes and brokerage fees paid in Canada and/or the United States on the material, per unit of each kind of materials.
(6) A certificate conforming to paragraph (b) (1), (2), or (3) of this section shall be accepted as evidence of the facts alleged therein only if:
(i) There is annexed thereto a copy of the commercial invoice or bill of lading, or the electronic equivalent, covering the articles or other documentary evidence which identifies the article to which the certificate pertains,
(ii) The certificate, or its electronic equivalent, is signed by the manufacturer or producer of the article to which it pertains, or by the person who exported the articles from Canada, and
(iii) It clearly appears that such copy or other documentary evidence was annexed to the certificate when it was signed.
(c) In lieu of the certification in paragraph (b) (1), (2), or (3) of this section, a manufacturer of motor vehicles who claims a preference under the United States-Canada Free-Trade Agreement and elects to average pursuant to § 10.310(a), shall be subject to the requirements of §§ 10.301 to 10.311 of this part.
(d) When an importer makes an entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption of articles for use as “original motor-vehicle equipment” as that term is defined in General Note 3(c)(iii), HTSUS, he shall file in connection therewith his declaration that the articles are being imported for use as original equipment in the manufacture in the United States of the kinds of motor vehicles specified in the General Note and furnish the name and address of the motor vehicle manufacturer. A copy of the written order, contract, or letter of intent shall be attached to the importer's declaration except that if the Center director is satisfied that a copy of the written order, contract, or letter of intent will be made available by the importer or ultimate consignee for inspection by customs officials upon request during a period of 3 years from the date of such entry or withdrawal from warehouse, the production of such documents will not be required. Proof of use need not be furnished.
(e) If, after a Canadian article has been accorded the status of original motor-vehicle equipment, it is decided to divert the article from its intended use in the manufacture in the United States of motor vehicles, the importer or other person deciding to divert the article from such intended use shall give notice in writing of the decision to the CBP, either at the port of entry or electronically or where the offices of the importer are located and either make arrangements for its destruction or exportation under Customs supervision or pay duties in accordance with General Note 3(c)(iii)(B)(2), HTSUS. If such article is not destroyed or exported under Customs supervision or the duties paid, the article, or its value, shall be subject to forfeiture.
§ 10.90Master records and metal matrices
§ 10.91Prototypes used exclusively for product development and testing
§ 10.98Copper-bearing fluxing material
§ 10.99Importation of ethyl alcohol for nonbeverage purposes
§ 10.100Entry, examination, and tariff status
§ 10.101Immediate delivery
(a) Shipments entitled to immediate delivery. Shipments consigned to or for the account of any agency or office of the United States Government, or to an officer or official of any such agency in his official capacity, shall be regarded for purposes of these regulations as shipments the immediate delivery of which is necessary within the purview of section 448(b), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1448(b)).
(b) Immediate delivery applications. The shipments described in the preceding paragraph may be released upon the filing of immediate delivery applications on Customs Form 3461, or its electronic equivalent, as set forth in subpart A of part 142 of this chapter. Such applications may be limited to particular shipments or may cover all shipments imported by the Government agency making the application. They may be approved for specific periods of time or for indefinite periods of time, provided in either case they are supported by carrier's certificates and stipulations as provided for in paragraph (c) of this section.
(c) Carrier's certificates and stipulations. Before the release of a shipment under an immediate delivery permit, evidence of the right of the applicant to make entry for the articles shall be furnished the port director in accordance with the provisions of §§ 141.11 and 141.12 of this chapter.
(d) Bond. No bond shall be required in support of an immediate delivery application provided for in this section if a stipulation in the form as set forth below is filed with the port director in connection with the application:
I, ________, ________ (Title), a duly authorized representative of the (Name of United States Government department or agency) stipulate and agree on behalf of such department or agency that all applicable provisions of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and the regulations thereunder, and all other laws and regulations, relating to the release and entry of merchandise will be observed and complied with in all respects. (Signature)
(Name of United States Government department or agency) stipulate and agree on behalf of such department or agency that all applicable provisions of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and the regulations thereunder, and all other laws and regulations, relating to the release and entry of merchandise will be observed and complied with in all respects.
(e) Timely entries required. If proper entries for consumption for importations released under these regulations are not filed within a reasonable time, appropriate steps shall be taken to insure the prompt filing of such entries.
§ 10.102Duty-free entries
§ 10.103American goods returned
§ 10.104Temporary importation entries for United States Government agencies
§ 10.107Equipment and supplies; admission
§ 10.108Entry of reimported articles exported under lease
Free entry shall be accorded under subheading 9801.00.20, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), whenever it is established to the satisfaction of the Center director that the article for which free entry is claimed was duty paid on a previous importation or was previously entered free of duty pursuant to the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act or Title V of the Trade Act of 1974, is being reimported without having been advanced in value or improved in condition by any process of manufacture or other means, was exported from the United States under a lease or similar use agreement, and is being reimported by or for the account of the person who imported it into, and exported it from, the United States.
§ 10.112Filing free entry documents or reduced duty documents after entry
§ 10.114General provisions
§ 10.121Visual or auditory materials of an educational, scientific, or cultural character
§ 10.131Circumstances in which applicable
§ 10.133Conditions required to be met
§ 10.134Declaration of intent
§ 10.135Deposit of duties
§ 10.136Suspension of liquidation
§ 10.137Records of use
§ 10.138Proof of use
Within 3 years from the date of entry or withdrawal from warehouse for consumption, the importer shall submit in duplicate in support of his claim for free entry or for a reduced rate of duty a certificate executed by (1) the superintendent or manager of the manufacturing plant, or (2) the individual end-user or other person having knowledge of the actual use of the imported article. The certificate shall include a description of the processing in sufficient detail to show that the use contemplated by the law has actually taken place. A blanket certificate covering all purchases of a given type of merchandise from a particular importer during a given period, or all such purchases with specified exceptions, may be accepted for this purpose, provided the importer shall furnish a statement showing in detail, in such manner as to be readily identified with each entry, the merchandise which he sold to such manufacturer or end-user during such period.
§ 10.139Liquidation
§ 10.151Importations not over $800
§ 10.152Bona-fide gifts
§ 10.153Conditions for exemption
§ 10.171General
§ 10.172Claim for exemption from duty under the Generalized System of Preferences
§ 10.173Evidence of country of origin
§ 10.174Evidence of direct shipment
§ 10.175Imported directly defined
§ 10.176Country of origin criteria
§ 10.177Cost or value of materials produced in the beneficiary developing country
§ 10.178Direct costs of processing operations performed in the beneficiary developing country
§ 10.178aSpecial duty-free treatment for sub-Saharan African countries
§ 10.179Canadian crude petroleum subject to a commercial exchange agreement between United States and Canadian refiners
§ 10.180Certification
§ 10.183Duty-free entry of civil aircraft, aircraft engines, ground flight simulators, parts, components, and subassemblies
§ 10.191General
§ 10.192Claim for exemption from duty under the CBI
§ 10.193Imported directly
§ 10.194Evidence of direct shipment
§ 10.195Country of origin criteria
§ 10.196Cost or value of materials produced in a beneficiary country or countries
§ 10.197Direct costs of processing operations performed in a beneficiary country or countries
§ 10.198Evidence of country of origin
§ 10.198aDuty reduction for certain leather-related articles
§ 10.198bProducts of Puerto Rico processed in a beneficiary country
§ 10.199Duty-free entry for certain beverages produced in Canada from Caribbean rum
§ 10.201Applicability
§ 10.202Definitions
§ 10.203Eligibility criteria in general
§ 10.204Imported directly
§ 10.205Country of origin criteria
§ 10.206Value content requirement
§ 10.207Procedures for filing duty-free treatment claim and submitting supporting documentation
§ 10.211Applicability
§ 10.212Definitions
§ 10.213Articles eligible for preferential treatment
§ 10.214Certificate of Origin
§ 10.215Filing of claim for preferential treatment
§ 10.216Maintenance of records and submission of Certificate by importer
§ 10.217Verification and justification of claim for preferential treatment
§ 10.221Applicability
§ 10.222Definitions
§ 10.223Articles eligible for preferential treatment
§ 10.224Certificate of Origin
§ 10.225Filing of claim for preferential treatment
§ 10.226Maintenance of records and submission of Certificate by importer
§ 10.227Verification and justification of claim for preferential treatment
§ 10.228Additional requirements for preferential treatment of brassieres
§ 10.231Applicability
§ 10.232Definitions
§ 10.233Articles eligible for preferential tariff treatment
§ 10.234Certificate of Origin
§ 10.235Filing of claim for preferential tariff treatment
§ 10.236Maintenance of records and submission of Certificate by importer
§ 10.237Verification and justification of claim for preferential tariff treatment
(a) Verification by Customs. A claim for preferential tariff treatment made under § 10.235, including any statements or other information contained on a Certificate of Origin submitted to Customs under § 10.236, will be subject to whatever verification the Center director deems necessary. In the event that the Center director for any reason is prevented from verifying the claim, the Center director may deny the claim for preferential tariff treatment. A verification of a claim for preferential tariff treatment may involve, but need not be limited to, a review of:
(1) All records required to be made, kept, and made available to Customs by the importer or any other person under part 163 of this chapter;
(2) Documentation and other information in a CBTPA beneficiary country regarding the country of origin of an article and its constituent materials, including, but not limited to, production records, information relating to the place of production, the number and identification of the types of machinery used in production, and the number of workers employed in production; and
(3) Evidence in a CBTPA beneficiary country to document the use of U.S. materials in the production of the article in question, such as purchase orders, invoices, bills of lading and other shipping documents, and customs import and clearance documents.
(b) Importer requirements. In order to make a claim for preferential tariff treatment under § 10.235, the importer:
(1) Must have records that explain how the importer came to the conclusion that the article qualifies for preferential tariff treatment. Those records must include documents that support a claim that the article in question qualifies for preferential tariff treatment because it meets the applicable rule of origin set forth in General Note 11, HTSUS, and in part 182, appendix A of this chapter. A properly completed Certificate of Origin in the form prescribed in § 10.236(b) is a record that would serve this purpose;
§ 10.241Applicability
§ 10.242Definitions
§ 10.243Articles eligible for preferential treatment
§ 10.244Certificate of Origin
§ 10.245Filing of claim for preferential treatment
§ 10.246Maintenance of records and submission of Certificate by importer
§ 10.247Verification and justification of claim for preferential treatment
§ 10.248Additional requirements for preferential treatment of brassieres
§ 10.251Applicability
§ 10.252Definitions
§ 10.253Articles eligible for preferential treatment
§ 10.254Certificate of Origin
§ 10.255Filing of claim for preferential treatment
§ 10.256Maintenance of records and submission of Certificate by importer
§ 10.257Verification and justification of claim for preferential treatment
§ 10.301Scope and applicability
§ 10.302Eligibility criteria in general
§ 10.303Originating goods
§ 10.304Exclusions
§ 10.305Value content requirement
§ 10.306Direct shipment to the United States
§ 10.307Documentation
§ 10.308Records retention
§ 10.309Verification of documentation
§ 10.310Election to average for motor vehicles
§ 10.311Documentation for election to average for motor vehicles
§ 10.401Scope
This subpart implements the duty preference and related customs provisions applicable to imported goods under the United States-Chile Free Trade Agreement (the US-CFTA) signed on June 6, 2003, and under the United States-Chile Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act (the Act; 117 Stat. 909). Except as otherwise specified in this subpart, the procedures and other requirements set forth in this subpart are in addition to the customs procedures and requirements of general application contained elsewhere in this chapter. Additional provisions implementing certain aspects of the US-CFTA and the Act are contained in parts 12, 24, 162, and 163 of this chapter.
§ 10.402General definitions
As used in this subpart, the following terms will have the meanings indicated unless either the context in which they are used requires a different meaning or a different definition is prescribed for a particular section of this subpart:
(a) Certification. “Certification” means, either when used by itself or in the expression “certification of origin”, the certification established under article 4.13 of the US-CFTA, that a good qualifies as an originating good under the US-CFTA;
(b) Claim of origin. “Claim of origin” means a claim that a textile or apparel good is an originating good or a good of a Party;
(c) Claim for preferential tariff treatment. “Claim for preferential tariff treatment” means a claim that a good is entitled to the duty rate applicable under the US-CFTA and to an exemption from the merchandise processing fee;
(d) Customs authority. “Customs authority” means the competent authority that is responsible under the law of a Party for the administration of customs laws and regulations;
(e) Customs Valuation Agreement. “Customs Valuation Agreement” means the Agreement on Implementation of Article VII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994, which is part of the WTO Agreement;
(f) Days. “Days” means calendar days;
(g) Customs duty. “Customs duty” includes any customs or import duty and a charge of any kind imposed in connection with the importation of a good, including any form of surtax or surcharge in connection with such importation, but, for purposes of implementing the US-CFTA, does not include any:
(1) Charge equivalent to an internal tax imposed consistently with Article III:2 of the GATT 1994; in respect of like, directly competitive, or substitutable goods of the Party, or in respect of goods from which the imported good has been manufactured or produced in whole or in part;
(2) Antidumping or countervailing duty; and
(3) Fee or other charge in connection with importation commensurate with the cost of services rendered;
(h) Enterprise. “Enterprise” means any entity constituted or organized under applicable law, whether or not for profit, and whether privately-owned or governmentally-owned, including any corporation, trust, partnership, sole proprietorship, joint venture, or other association;
(i) GATT 1994. “GATT 1994” means the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994, which is part of the WTO Agreement;
(j) Goods. “Goods” means domestic products as these are understood in the GATT 1994 or such goods as the Parties may agree, and includes originating goods of that Party. A good of a Party may include materials of other countries;
(k) Harmonized System. “Harmonized System (HS)” means the Harmonized Commodity Description and Coding System, including its General Rules of Interpretation, Section Notes, and Chapter Notes, as adopted and implemented by the Parties in their respective tariff laws;
(l) Heading. “Heading” means the first four digits in the tariff classification number under the Harmonized System;
(m) HTSUS. “HTSUS” means the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States as promulgated by the U.S. International Trade Commission;
(n) Identical goods. “Identical goods” means goods that are the same in all respects relevant to the particular rule of origin that qualifies the goods as originating;
(o) Indirect material. “Indirect material” means a good used in the production, testing, or inspection of a good in the territory of the United States or Chile but not physically incorporated into the good, or a good used in the maintenance of buildings or the operation of equipment associated with the production of a good in the territory of the United States or Chile, including—
(1) Fuel and energy;
(2) Tools, dies, and molds;
(3) Spare parts and materials used in the maintenance of equipment and buildings;
(4) Lubricants, greases, compounding materials, and other materials used in production or used to operate equipment and buildings;
(5) Gloves, glasses, footwear, clothing, safety equipment, and supplies;
(6) Equipment, devices, and supplies used for testing or inspecting the goods;
(7) Catalysts and solvents; and
(8) Any other goods that are not incorporated into the good but whose use in the production of the good can reasonably be demonstrated to be a part of that production;
(p) Originating. “Originating” means qualifying under the rules of origin set out in Chapter Four (Rules of Origin and Origin Procedures) of the US-CFTA;
(q) Party. “Party” means the United States or the Republic of Chile;
(r) Person. “Person” means a natural person or an enterprise;
(s) Preferential tariff treatment. “Preferential tariff treatment” means the duty rate applicable to an originating good under the US-CFTA, and an exemption from the merchandise processing fee.
(t) Subheading. “Subheading” means the first six digits in the tariff classification number under the Harmonized System;
(u) Tariff preference level. “Tariff preference level” means a quantitative limit for certain non-originating textiles and textile apparel goods that may be entitled to preferential tariff treatment as if such goods were originating based on the goods meeting the production requirements set forth in § 10.421 of this subpart.
(v) Textile or apparel good. “Textile or apparel good” means a good listed in the Annex to the Agreement on Textiles and Clothing (commonly referred to as ATC), which is part of the WTO Agreement;
(w) Territory. “Territory” means:
(1) With respect to Chile, the land, maritime and air space under its sovereignty, and the exclusive economic zone and the continental shelf within which it exercises sovereign rights and jurisdiction in accordance with international law and its domestic law; and
(2) With respect to the United States,
(i) The customs territory of the United States, which includes the 50 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico,
(ii) The foreign trade zones located in the United States and Puerto Rico, and
(iii) Any areas beyond the territorial seas of the United States within which, in accordance with international law and its domestic law, the United States may exercise rights with respect to the seabed and subsoil and their natural resources;
(x) WTO Agreement. “WTO Agreement” means the Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization of April 15, 1994.
§ 10.410Filing of claim for preferential tariff treatment upon importation
§ 10.411Certification of origin or other information
§ 10.412Importer obligations
§ 10.413Validity of certification
§ 10.414Certification or other information not required
§ 10.415Maintenance of records
§ 10.416Effect of noncompliance; failure to provide documentation regarding transshipment
§ 10.420Filing of claim for tariff preference level
§ 10.421Goods eligible for tariff preference claims
§ 10.422Submission of certificate of eligibility
§ 10.423Certificate of eligibility not required
§ 10.424Effect of noncompliance; failure to provide documentation regarding transshipment of non-originating cotton or man-made fiber fabric or apparel goods
§ 10.425Transit and transshipment of non-originating cotton or man-made fiber fabric or apparel goods
§ 10.430Export requirements
§ 10.431Failure to comply with requirements
§ 10.440Right to make post-importation claim and refund duties
§ 10.441Filing procedures
§ 10.442CBP processing procedures
§ 10.450Definitions
§ 10.451Originating goods
§ 10.452Exclusions
§ 10.453Treatment of textile and apparel sets
§ 10.454Regional value content
§ 10.455Value of materials
§ 10.456Accessories, spare parts or tools
§ 10.457Fungible goods and materials
§ 10.458Accumulation
§ 10.459De minimis
§ 10.460Indirect materials
§ 10.461Retail packaging materials and containers
§ 10.462Packing materials and containers for shipment
§ 10.463Transit and transshipment
§ 10.470Verification and justification of claim for preferential tariff treatment
§ 10.471Special rule for verifications in Chile of U.S. imports of textile and apparel products
§ 10.472Verification in the United States of textile and apparel goods
§ 10.473Issuance of negative origin determinations
§ 10.474Repeated false or unsupported preference claims
§ 10.480General
§ 10.481Corrected declaration by importers
§ 10.482Corrected certifications of origin by exporters or producers
§ 10.483Framework for correcting declarations and certifications
§ 10.490Goods re-entered after repair or alteration in Chile
§ 10.501Scope
§ 10.502General definitions
§ 10.510Filing of claim for preferential tariff treatment upon importation
§ 10.511Supporting statement
§ 10.512Importer obligations
§ 10.513Supporting statement not required
§ 10.514Maintenance of records
§ 10.515Effect of noncompliance; failure to provide documentation regarding third country transportation
§ 10.520Filing of claim for tariff preference level
§ 10.521Goods eligible for tariff preference level claims
§ 10.522Submission of certificate of eligibility
§ 10.530Definitions
§ 10.531Originating goods
§ 10.532Integrated Sourcing Initiative
§ 10.533De minimis
§ 10.534Accumulation
§ 10.535Regional value content
§ 10.536Value of materials
§ 10.537Accessories, spare parts, or tools
§ 10.538Fungible goods and materials
§ 10.539Retail packaging materials and containers
§ 10.540Packing materials and containers for shipment
§ 10.541Indirect materials
§ 10.542Third country transportation
§ 10.543Certain apparel goods made from fabric or yarn not available in commercial quantities
§ 10.550Verification and justification of claim for preferential treatment
§ 10.551Issuance of negative origin determinations
§ 10.552Information sharing by CBP regarding textile and apparel goods produced in the United States
§ 10.553Textile and apparel site visits
§ 10.554Exclusion of textile or apparel goods for intentional circumvention
§ 10.560General
§ 10.561Corrected claim or supporting statement
§ 10.562Framework for correcting claims or supporting statements
§ 10.570Goods re-entered after repair or alteration in Singapore
§ 10.581Scope
§ 10.582General definitions
§ 10.583Filing of claim for preferential tariff treatment upon importation
§ 10.584Certification
§ 10.585Importer obligations
§ 10.586Certification not required
§ 10.587Maintenance of records
§ 10.588Effect of noncompliance; failure to provide documentation regarding transshipment
§ 10.589Certification for goods exported to a Party
§ 10.590Right to make post-importation claim and refund duties
§ 10.591Filing procedures
§ 10.592CBP processing procedures
§ 10.593Definitions
§ 10.594Originating goods
§ 10.595Regional value content
§ 10.596Value of materials
§ 10.597Accumulation
§ 10.598De minimis
§ 10.599Fungible goods and materials
§ 10.600Accessories, spare parts, or tools
§ 10.601Retail packaging materials and containers
§ 10.602Packing materials and containers for shipment
§ 10.603Indirect materials
§ 10.604Transit and transshipment
§ 10.605Goods classifiable as goods put up in sets
§ 10.606Filing of claim for tariff preference level
§ 10.607Goods eligible for tariff preference level claims
§ 10.608Submission of certificate of eligibility for certain apparel goods of Nicaragua
§ 10.609Transshipment of non-originating cotton or man-made fiber apparel goods
§ 10.610Effect of noncompliance; failure to provide documentation regarding transshipment of non-originating cotton or man-made fiber apparel goods
§ 10.616Verification and justification of claim for preferential tariff treatment
§ 10.617Special rule for verifications in a Party of U.S. imports of textile and apparel goods
§ 10.618Issuance of negative origin determinations
§ 10.619Repeated false or unsupported preference claims
§ 10.620General
§ 10.621Corrected claim or certification by importers
§ 10.622Corrected certification by U.S. exporters or producers
§ 10.623Framework for correcting claims or certifications
§ 10.624Goods re-entered after repair or alteration in a Party
§ 10.625Refunds of excess customs duties
§ 10.701Scope
§ 10.702Definitions
§ 10.703Filing of claim for preferential tariff treatment
§ 10.704Declaration
§ 10.705Importer obligations
§ 10.706Declaration not required
§ 10.707Maintenance of records
§ 10.708Effect of noncompliance; failure to provide documentation regarding third-country transportation
§ 10.709Country of origin criteria
§ 10.710Value-content requirement
§ 10.711Imported directly
§ 10.712Verification of claim for preferential tariff treatment
§ 10.721Scope
§ 10.722General definitions
§ 10.723Filing of claim for preferential tariff treatment upon importation
§ 10.724Supporting statement
§ 10.725Importer obligations
§ 10.726Supporting statement not required
§ 10.727Maintenance of records
§ 10.728Effect of noncompliance; failure to provide documentation regarding third country transportation
§ 10.729Definitions
§ 10.730Originating goods
§ 10.731Textile and apparel goods classifiable as goods put up in sets
§ 10.732De minimis
§ 10.733Accumulation
§ 10.734Regional value content
§ 10.735Value of materials
§ 10.736Accessories, spare parts, or tools
§ 10.737Fungible goods and materials
§ 10.738Retail packaging materials and containers
§ 10.739Packing materials and containers for shipment
§ 10.740Indirect materials
§ 10.741Third country transportation
§ 10.742Verification and justification of claim for preferential treatment
§ 10.743Special rule for verifications in Australia of U.S. imports of textile and apparel goods
§ 10.744Issuance of negative origin determinations
§ 10.745General
§ 10.746Corrected claim or supporting statement
§ 10.747Framework for correcting claims or supporting statements
§ 10.748Goods re-entered after repair or alteration in Australia
§ 10.761Scope
§ 10.762General definitions
§ 10.763Filing of claim for preferential tariff treatment upon importation
§ 10.764Declaration
§ 10.765Importer obligations
§ 10.766Declaration not required
§ 10.767Maintenance of records
§ 10.768Effect of noncompliance; failure to provide documentation regarding transshipment
§ 10.769Definitions
§ 10.770Originating goods
(a) General. A good will be considered an originating good under the MFTA when imported directly from the territory of a Party into the territory of the other Party only if:
(1) The good is wholly the growth, product, or manufacture of one or both of the Parties;
(2) The good is a new or different article of commerce, as defined in § 10.769(i) of this subpart, that has been grown, produced, or manufactured in the territory of one or both of the Parties, is provided for in a heading or subheading of the HTSUS that is not covered by the product-specific rules set forth in General Note 27(h), HTSUS, and meets the value-content requirement specified in paragraph (b) of this section; or
(3) The good is provided for in a heading or subheading of the HTSUS covered by the product-specific rules set forth in General Note 27(h), HTSUS, and:
(i)(A) Each of the non-originating materials used in the production of the good undergoes an applicable change in tariff classification specified in General Note 27(h), HTSUS, as a result of production occurring entirely in the territory of one or both of the Parties; or
(B) The good otherwise satisfies the requirements specified in General Note 27(h), HTSUS; and
(ii) The good meets any other requirements specified in General Note 27, HTSUS.
(b) Value-content requirement. A good described in paragraph (a)(2) of this section will be considered an originating good under the MFTA only if the sum of the value of materials produced in one or both of the Parties, plus the direct costs of processing operations (see § 10.774 of this subpart) performed in one or both of the Parties, is not less than 35 percent of the appraised value of the good at the time the good is entered into the territory of the United States.
(c) Combining, packaging, and diluting operations. For purposes of this subpart, a good will not be considered a new or different article of commerce by virtue of having undergone simple combining or packaging operations, or mere dilution with water or another substance that does not materially alter the characteristics of the good. The principles and examples set forth in § 10.195(a)(2) of this part will apply equally for purposes of this paragraph.
§ 10.771Textile or apparel goods
§ 10.772Accumulation
§ 10.773Value of materials
§ 10.774Direct costs of processing operations
§ 10.775Packaging and packing materials and containers for retail sale and for shipment
§ 10.776Indirect materials
§ 10.777Imported directly
§ 10.778Filing of claim for tariff preference level
§ 10.779Goods eligible for tariff preference claims
§ 10.780Transshipment of non-originating fabric or apparel goods
§ 10.781Effect of noncompliance; failure to provide documentation regarding transshipment of non-originating fabric or apparel goods
§ 10.784Verification and justification of claim for preferential treatment
§ 10.785Issuance of negative origin determinations
§ 10.786Violations relating to the MFTA
§ 10.787Goods re-entered after repair or alteration in Morocco
§ 10.801Scope
§ 10.802General definitions
§ 10.803Filing of claim for preferential tariff treatment upon importation
§ 10.804Declaration
§ 10.805Importer obligations
§ 10.806Declaration not required
§ 10.807Maintenance of records
§ 10.808Effect of noncompliance; failure to provide documentation regarding transshipment
§ 10.809Definitions
§ 10.810Originating goods
§ 10.811Textile or apparel goods
§ 10.812Accumulation
§ 10.813Value of materials
§ 10.814Direct costs of processing operations
§ 10.815Packaging and packing materials and containers for retail sale and for shipment
§ 10.816Indirect materials
§ 10.817Imported directly
§ 10.818Filing of claim for tariff preference level
§ 10.819Goods eligible for tariff preference claims
§ 10.820Certificate of eligibility
§ 10.821Declaration
§ 10.822Transshipment of non-originating fabric or apparel goods
§ 10.823Effect of non-compliance; failure to provide documentation regarding transshipment of non-originating fabric or apparel goods
§ 10.824Verification and justification of claim for preferential treatment
§ 10.825Issuance of negative origin determinations
§ 10.826Violations relating to the BFTA
§ 10.827Goods re-entered after repair or alteration in Bahrain
§ 10.841Applicability
§ 10.842Definitions
§ 10.843Articles eligible for duty-free treatment
§ 10.844Value-content requirement
§ 10.845Retroactive application of duty-free treatment for certain apparel articles
§ 10.846Imported directly
§ 10.847Filing of claim for duty-free treatment
§ 10.848Declaration of compliance
§ 10.849Importer obligations
§ 10.850Verification of claim for duty-free treatment
§ 10.861Scope
This subpart implements the duty preference and related customs provisions applicable to imported goods under the United States-Oman Free Trade Agreement (the OFTA) signed on January 19, 2006, and under the United States-Oman Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act (the Act; 120 Stat. 1191). Except as otherwise specified in this subpart, the procedures and other requirements set forth in this subpart are in addition to the customs procedures and requirements of general application contained elsewhere in this chapter. Additional provisions implementing certain aspects of the OFTA and the Act are contained in Parts 24, 162, and 163 of this chapter.
§ 10.862General definitions
§ 10.863Filing of claim for preferential tariff treatment upon importation
§ 10.864Declaration
§ 10.865Importer obligations
§ 10.866Declaration not required
§ 10.867Maintenance of records
§ 10.868Effect of noncompliance; failure to provide documentation regarding transshipment
§ 10.869Right to make post-importation claim and refund duties
§ 10.870Filing procedures
§ 10.871CBP processing procedures
§ 10.872Definitions
§ 10.873Originating goods
§ 10.874Textile or apparel goods
§ 10.875Accumulation
§ 10.876Value of materials
§ 10.877Direct costs of processing operations
§ 10.878Packaging and packing materials and containers for retail sale and for shipment
§ 10.879Indirect materials
§ 10.880Imported directly
§ 10.881Filing of claim for tariff preference level
§ 10.882Goods eligible for tariff preference claims
§ 10.884Declaration
§ 10.885Transshipment of non-originating apparel goods
§ 10.886Effect of non-compliance; failure to provide documentation regarding transshipment of non-originating apparel goods
§ 10.887Verification and justification of claim for preferential treatment
§ 10.888Issuance of negative origin determinations
§ 10.889Violations relating to the OFTA
§ 10.890Goods re-entered after repair or alteration in Oman
§ 10.901Scope
§ 10.902General definitions
§ 10.903Filing of claim for preferential tariff treatment upon importation
§ 10.904Certification
§ 10.905Importer obligations
§ 10.906Certification not required
§ 10.907Maintenance of records
§ 10.908Effect of noncompliance; failure to provide documentation regarding transshipment
§ 10.909Certification for goods exported to Peru
§ 10.910Right to make post-importation claim and refund duties
§ 10.911Filing procedures
§ 10.912CBP processing procedures
§ 10.913Definitions
§ 10.914Originating goods
§ 10.915Regional value content
§ 10.916Value of materials
§ 10.917Accumulation
§ 10.918De minimis
§ 10.919Fungible goods and materials
§ 10.920Accessories, spare parts, or tools
§ 10.921Goods classifiable as goods put up in sets
§ 10.922Retail packaging materials and containers
§ 10.923Packing materials and containers for shipment
§ 10.924Indirect materials
§ 10.925Transit and transshipment
§ 10.926Verification and justification of claim for preferential tariff treatment
§ 10.927Special rule for verifications in Peru of U.S. imports of textile and apparel goods
§ 10.928Issuance of negative origin determinations
§ 10.929Repeated false or unsupported preference claims
§ 10.930General
§ 10.931Corrected claim or certification by importers
§ 10.932Corrected certification by U.S. exporters or producers
§ 10.933Framework for correcting claims or certifications
§ 10.934Goods re-entered after repair or alteration in Peru
§ 10.1001Scope
§ 10.1002General definitions
§ 10.1003Filing of claim for preferential tariff treatment upon importation
§ 10.1004Certification
§ 10.1005Importer obligations
§ 10.1006Certification not required
§ 10.1007Maintenance of records
§ 10.1008Effect of noncompliance; failure to provide documentation regarding transshipment
§ 10.1009Certification for goods exported to Korea
§ 10.1010Right to make post-importation claim and refund duties
§ 10.1011Filing procedures
§ 10.1012CBP processing procedures
§ 10.1013Definitions
§ 10.1014Originating goods
§ 10.1015Regional value content
(a) General. Except for goods to which paragraph (d) of this section applies, where General Note 33, HTSUS, sets forth a rule that specifies a regional value content test for a good, the regional value content of such good must be calculated by the importer, exporter, or producer of the good on the basis of the build-down method described in paragraph (b) of this section or the build-up method described in paragraph (c) of this section.
(b) Build-down method. Under the build-down method, the regional value content must be calculated on the basis of the formula RVC = ((AV − VNM)/AV) × 100, where RVC is the regional value content, expressed as a percentage; AV is the adjusted value of the good; and VNM is the value of non-originating materials, other than indirect materials, that are acquired and used by the producer in the production of the good, but does not include the value of a material that is self-produced.
(c) Build-up method. Under the build-up method, the regional value content must be calculated on the basis of the formula RVC = (VOM/AV) × 100, where RVC is the regional value content, expressed as a percentage; AV is the adjusted value of the good; and VOM is the value of originating materials, other than indirect materials, that are acquired or self-produced and used by the producer in the production of the good.
(d) Special rule for certain automotive goods—(1) General. Where General Note 33, HTSUS, sets forth a rule that specifies a regional value content test for an automotive good provided for in any of subheadings 8407.31 through 8407.34 (engines), subheading 8408.20 (diesel engine for vehicles), heading 8409 (parts of engines), headings 8701 through 8705 (motor vehicles), and headings 8706 (chassis), 8707 (bodies), and 8708 (motor vehicle parts), HTSUS, the regional value content of such good may be calculated by the importer, exporter, or producer of the good on the basis of the net cost method described in paragraph (d)(2) of this section.
(2) Net cost method. Under the net cost method, the regional value content is calculated on the basis of the formula RVC = ((NC − VNM)/NC) × 100, where RVC is the regional value content, expressed as a percentage; NC is the net cost of the good; and VNM is the value of non-originating materials, other than indirect materials, that are acquired and used by the producer in the production of the good, but does not include the value of a material that is self-produced. Consistent with the provisions set out in Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, applicable in the territory of the Party where the good is produced, the net cost of the good must be determined by:
(i) Calculating the total cost incurred with respect to all goods produced by the producer of the automotive good, subtracting any sales promotion, marketing, and after-sales service costs, royalties, shipping and packing costs, and non-allowable interest costs that are included in the total cost of all such goods, and then reasonably allocating the resulting net cost of those goods to the automotive good;
(ii) Calculating the total cost incurred with respect to all goods produced by the producer of the automotive good, reasonably allocating the total cost to the automotive good, and then subtracting any sales promotion, marketing, and after-sales service costs, royalties, shipping and packing costs, and non-allowable interest costs that are included in the portion of the total cost allocated to the automotive good; or
(iii) Reasonably allocating each cost that forms part of the total costs incurred with respect to the automotive good so that the aggregate of these costs does not include any sales promotion, marketing, and after-sales service costs, royalties, shipping and packing costs, or non-allowable interest costs.
(3) Motor vehicles—(i) General. For purposes of calculating the regional value content under the net cost method for an automotive good that is a motor vehicle provided for in any of headings 8701 through 8705, an importer, exporter, or producer may average the amounts calculated under the formula set forth in paragraph (d)(2) of this section over the producer's fiscal year using any one of the categories described in paragraph (d)(3)(ii) of this section either on the basis of all motor vehicles in the category or those motor vehicles in the category that are exported to the territory of one or both Parties.
(ii) Categories. The categories referred to in paragraph (d)(3)(i) of this section are as follows:
(A) The same model line of motor vehicles, in the same class of vehicles, produced in the same plant in the territory of a Party, as the motor vehicle for which the regional value content is being calculated;
(B) The same class of motor vehicles, and produced in the same plant in the territory of a Party, as the motor vehicle for which the regional value content is being calculated; and
(C) The same model line of motor vehicles produced in the territory of a Party as the motor vehicle for which the regional value content is being calculated.
(4) Other automotive goods—(i) General. For purposes of calculating the regional value content under the net cost method for automotive goods provided for in any of subheadings 8407.31 through 8407.34, subheading 8408.20, heading 8409, 8706, 8707, or 8708, HTSUS, that are produced in the same plant, an importer, exporter, or producer may:
(A) Average the amounts calculated under the formula set forth in paragraph (d)(2) of this section over any of the following: the fiscal year, or any quarter or month, of the motor vehicle producer to whom the automotive good is sold, or the fiscal year, or any quarter or month, of the producer of the automotive good, provided the goods were produced during the fiscal year, quarter, or month that is the basis for the calculation;
(B) Determine the average referred to in paragraph (d)(4)(i)(A) of this section separately for such goods sold to one or more motor vehicle producers; or
(C) Make a separate determination under paragraph (d)(4)(i)(A) or (B) of this section for automotive goods that are exported to the territory of Korea or the United States.
(ii) Duration of use. A person selecting an averaging period of one month or quarter under paragraph (d)(4)(i)(A) of this section must continue to use that method for that category of automotive goods throughout the fiscal year.
§ 10.1016Value of materials
§ 10.1017Accumulation
§ 10.1018De minimis
§ 10.1019Fungible goods and materials
§ 10.1020Accessories, spare parts, or tools
§ 10.1021Goods classifiable as goods put up in sets
§ 10.1022Retail packaging materials and containers
§ 10.1023Packing materials and containers for shipment
§ 10.1024Indirect materials
§ 10.1025Transit and transshipment
(a) General. A good that has undergone production necessary to qualify as an originating good under § 10.1014 of this subpart will not be considered an originating good if, subsequent to that production, the good:
(1) Undergoes further production or any other operation outside the territories of the Parties, other than unloading, reloading, or any other operation necessary to preserve the good in good condition or to transport the good to the territory of a Party; or
(2) Does not remain under the control of customs authorities in the territory of a non-Party.
(b) Documentary evidence. An importer making a claim that a good is originating may be required to demonstrate, to CBP's satisfaction, that the conditions and requirements set forth in paragraph (a) of this section were met. An importer may demonstrate compliance with this section by submitting documentary evidence. Such evidence may include, but is not limited to, bills of lading, airway bills, packing lists, commercial invoices, receiving and inventory records, and customs entry and exit documents.
§ 10.1026Verification and justification of claim for preferential tariff treatment
§ 10.1027Special rule for verifications in Korea of U.S. imports of textile and apparel goods
§ 10.1028Issuance of negative origin determinations
§ 10.1029Repeated false or unsupported preference claims
§ 10.1030General
§ 10.1031Corrected claim or certification by importers
§ 10.1032Corrected certification by U.S. exporters or producers
§ 10.1033Framework for correcting claims or certifications
§ 10.1034Goods re-entered after repair or alteration in Korea
§ 10.2001Scope
§ 10.2002General definitions
§ 10.2003Filing of claim for preferential tariff treatment upon importation
§ 10.2004Certification
§ 10.2005Importer obligations
§ 10.2006Certification not required
§ 10.2007Maintenance of records
§ 10.2008Effect of noncompliance; failure to provide documentation regarding transshipment
§ 10.2009Certification for goods exported to Panama
§ 10.2010Right to make post-importation claim and refund duties
§ 10.2011Filing procedures
§ 10.2012CBP processing procedures
§ 10.2013Definitions
§ 10.2014Originating goods
§ 10.2015Regional value content
§ 10.2016Value of materials
§ 10.2017Accumulation
§ 10.2018De minimis
§ 10.2019Fungible goods and materials
§ 10.2020Accessories, spare parts, or tools
§ 10.2021Goods classifiable as goods put up in sets
§ 10.2022Retail packaging materials and containers
§ 10.2023Packing materials and containers for shipment
§ 10.2024Indirect materials
§ 10.2025Transit and transshipment
§ 10.2026Verification and justification of claim for preferential tariff treatment
§ 10.2027Special rule for verifications in Panama of U.S. imports of textile and apparel goods
§ 10.2028Issuance of negative origin determinations
§ 10.2029Repeated false or unsupported preference claims
§ 10.2030General
§ 10.2031Corrected claim or certification by importers
§ 10.2032Corrected certification by U.S. exporters or producers
§ 10.2033Framework for correcting claims or certifications
§ 10.2034Goods re-entered after repair or alteration in Panama
§ 10.3001Scope
This subpart implements the duty preference and related customs provisions applicable to imported and exported goods under the United States-Colombia Trade Promotion Agreement (the CTPA) signed on November 22, 2006, and under the United States-Colombia Trade Promotion Agreement Implementation Act (the “Act”), Public Law 112-42, 125 Stat. 462 (19 U.S.C. 3805 note). Except as otherwise specified in this subpart, the procedures and other requirements set forth in this subpart are in addition to the customs procedures and requirements of general application contained elsewhere in this chapter. Additional provisions implementing certain aspects of the CTPA and the Act are contained in Parts 24, 162, and 163 of this chapter.
§ 10.3002General definitions
§ 10.3003Filing of claim for preferential tariff treatment upon importation
§ 10.3004Certification
§ 10.3005Importer obligations
§ 10.3006Certification not required
§ 10.3007Maintenance of records
§ 10.3008Effect of noncompliance; failure to provide documentation regarding transshipment
§ 10.3009Certification for goods exported to Colombia
§ 10.3010Right to make post-importation claim and refund duties
§ 10.3011Filing procedures
§ 10.3012CBP processing procedures
§ 10.3013Definitions
§ 10.3014Originating goods
§ 10.3015Regional value content
§ 10.3016Value of materials
(a) Calculating the value of materials. For purposes of calculating the regional value content of a good under General Note 34, HTSUS, and for purposes of applying the de minimis (see § 10.3018) provisions of General Note 34, HTSUS, the value of a material is:
(1) In the case of a material imported by the producer of the good, the adjusted value of the material;
(2) In the case of a material acquired by the producer in the territory where the good is produced, the value, determined in accordance with Articles 1 through 8, Article 15, and the corresponding interpretative notes of the Customs Valuation Agreement, of the material, i.e., in the same manner as for imported goods, with reasonable modifications to the provisions of the Customs Valuation Agreement as may be required due to the absence of an importation by the producer (including, but not limited to, treating a domestic purchase by the producer as if it were a sale for export to the country of importation); or
(3) In the case of a self-produced material, the sum of:
(i) All expenses incurred in the production of the material, including general expenses; and
(ii) An amount for profit equivalent to the profit added in the normal course of trade.
(b) Examples. The following examples illustrate application of the principles set forth in paragraph (a)(2) of this section:
Example 1.
Example 2.
(c) Permissible additions to, and deductions from, the value of materials—(1) Additions to originating materials. For originating materials, the following expenses, if not included under paragraph (a) of this section, may be added to the value of the originating material:
(i) The costs of freight, insurance, packing, and all other costs incurred in transporting the material within or between the territory of one or both of the Parties to the location of the producer;
(ii) Duties, taxes, and customs brokerage fees on the material paid in the territory of one or both of the Parties, other than duties and taxes that are waived, refunded, refundable, or otherwise recoverable, including credit against duty or tax paid or payable; and
(iii) The cost of waste and spoilage resulting from the use of the material in the production of the good, less the value of renewable scrap or byproducts.
(2) Deductions from non-originating materials. For non-originating materials, if included under paragraph (a) of this section, the following expenses may be deducted from the value of the non-originating material:
(i) The costs of freight (“cost of freight” includes the costs of all types of freight, including in-land freight incurred within a Party's territory, regardless of the mode of transportation), insurance, packing, and all other costs incurred in transporting the material within or between the territory of one or both of the Parties to the location of the producer;
(ii) Duties, taxes, and customs brokerage fees on the material paid in the territory of one or both of the Parties, other than duties and taxes that are waived, refunded, refundable, or otherwise recoverable, including credit against duty or tax paid or payable;
(iii) The cost of waste and spoilage resulting from the use of the material in the production of the good, less the value of renewable scrap or by-products; and
(iv) The cost of originating materials used in the production of the non-originating material in the territory of one or both of the Parties.
(d) Accounting method. Any cost or value referenced in General Note 34, HTSUS, and this subpart, must be recorded and maintained in accordance with the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles applicable in the territory of the Party in which the good is produced.
§ 10.3017Accumulation
§ 10.3018De minimis
§ 10.3019Fungible goods and materials
§ 10.3020Accessories, spare parts, or tools
§ 10.3021Goods classifiable as goods put up in sets
§ 10.3022Retail packaging materials and containers
§ 10.3023Packing materials and containers for shipment
§ 10.3024Indirect materials
§ 10.3025Transit and transshipment
§ 10.3026Verification and justification of claim for preferential tariff treatment
§ 10.3027Special rule for verifications in Colombia of U.S. imports of textile and apparel goods
§ 10.3028Issuance of negative origin determinations
§ 10.3029Repeated false or unsupported preference claims
§ 10.3030General
§ 10.3031Corrected claim or certification by importers
§ 10.3032Corrected certification by U.S. exporters or producers
§ 10.3033Framework for correcting claims or certifications
§ 10.3034Goods re-entered after repair or alteration in Colombia
Other exam questions from Part 10
April 2019, Q73. Automotive radial tires classified in HTSUS 4011.10.10 that were produced in Korea and originate under the terms of the U.S.-Korea FTA (KORUS) are entered into the commerce of Japan by Toyota then are rerouted to Georgetown, KY, owing to a supply chain disruption in the U.S. Are these tires eligible for KORUS duty preference upon importation into the U.S. and why?
- ANo, because a Japanese company does not have standing to make a preference claim under the KORUS.
- BYes, because the KORUS allows originating goods to enter the commerce of a third country without losing originating status as long as they are not further processed.
- CNo, because the KORUS does not allow originating goods to enter the commerce of a third country without losing originating status.
- DYes, because the KORUS allows originating goods to be further processed in another country as long as the processing is merely a finishing operation that does not result in a change in tariff classification. F. Yes, because the KORUS allows originating goods to be further processed in another country as long as the processing is not greater than the 10% permissible under de minimis.
Show the answer and explanation
The correct answer is C because the KORUS agreement, under 19 CFR 10.1025(a)(1), explicitly prohibits originating goods from entering the commerce of a third country (like Japan) without losing their originating status, as such action constitutes "further production or any other operation outside the territories of the Parties." The tires, having entered Japan’s commerce, no longer meet the requirement to remain under customs control in a non-Party’s territory (19 CFR 10.1025(a)(2)), disqualifying them from KORUS duty preference. Option B incorrectly assumes third-country entry preserves status, while D misapplies de minimis rules not relevant here. Option A is irrelevant, as the issue is about the goods’ status, not the claimant’s standing.
April 2021, Q49. Which of the following documents MUST be filed pursuant to 19 CFR § 10.1(a) in connection with the entry of articles in a shipment valued over $2,500.00 and claimed to be free of duty under subheading 9801.00.10 or 9802.00.20, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS):
- AA declaration by the assembler
- BAn end use statement
- CA declaration by the foreign shipper
- DProof of payment
- ECBP Form 3495 (Application for Exportation of Articles under Special Bond)
Show the answer and explanation
The correct answer is C because 19 CFR 10.1(a)(1) explicitly requires a declaration by the foreign shipper for shipments valued over $2,500 claimed under subheadings 9801.00.10 or 9802.00.20, HTSUS. Other options are not mandated by this section: a declaration by the assembler (A) or end use statement (B) are not referenced here, proof of payment (D) pertains to different procedural requirements, and CBP Form 3495 (E) relates to exportation under a special bond, not entry under these subheadings.
April 2021, Q53. The following are examples of assembly operations which are incidental to the assembly process EXCEPT:
- ACleaning
- BTrimming filing, or cutting off of small amounts of excess materials
- CCutting to length of wire, thread, tape, foil, and other similar p roducts exported in continuous length: separation by cutting of finished components
- DRemoval of rust, grease, paint, or other preservative coating
- ECutting of garment part according to pattern from exported material
Show the answer and explanation
The correct answer is E because 19 CFR 10.16(c)(2) explicitly lists "cutting of garment parts according to pattern from exported material" as an operation not incidental to the assembly process, thereby disqualifying it as an example of incidental assembly. Options A, B, D, and the first part of C are all enumerated in 19 CFR 10.16(b) as examples of operations considered incidental. Option E is excluded because its primary purpose is fabrication, not assembly, as stated in 19 CFR 10.16(c)(2), which defines operations not incidental as those involving significant fabrication or completion of components.
April 2021, Q54. Antique articles are prohibited entry under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (19 USC1521) with some exceptions. Which of the following statement is FALSE?
- AThe article is not less than 100 years
- BThe articles are entered at a port designated in 19 CFR § 18.26
- CThe articles are composed in whole o r in part of any endangered or threatened species as listed in 50 CFR § 17.11 or 50 CFR § 17.12
- DThe articles have not been repaired or modified with any part of any such endangered or threatened species on or after December 28, 1973.
- EA declaration for Importation or Exportation of Fish or Wildlife (USFWF) Form 3-177 or its electronic equivalent is filed at the time of entry with the port director who will forward the form to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Show the answer and explanation
The correct answer is B because 19 CFR 10.53(e)(4) specifies that antique articles must be entered at a port designated in §12.26 of this chapter, not §18.26 as stated in option B. The other options align with the conditions in 10.53(e): A matches the age requirement (e)(2), C matches the endangered species requirement (e)(1), D matches the repair/modification restriction (e)(3), and E matches the declaration requirement (e)(5). The error in B lies in the incorrect reference to §18.26 instead of §12.26.
April 2022, Q31. If Temporary Importation Under Bond (TIB) goods are to be exported at a port other than where the import examination was conducted, what CBP form should be presented for examination of the TIB goods?
- ACBP Form 3173
- BCBP Form 3461
- CCBP Form 3495
- DCBP Form 6043
- ECBP Form 7501
Show the answer and explanation
The correct answer is C) CBP Form 3495 because 19 CFR 10.38(c) explicitly states that when TIB goods are to be exported from a port other than the one where the import examination was conducted, the application must be filed on Customs Form 3495 in triplicate. This requirement is directly tied to the scenario described in the question. The other options are not mentioned in the cited authority, which only references Form 3495 for this specific exportation context.
April 2022, Q61. Which definition below does NOT properly define the bolded and italicized term in the sentence according to 19 CFR?
- AAbsolute (or quantitative) quota is a claim that a good is entitled to the duty rate applicable under the U.S.-Chile FTA and to an exemption from the Merchandise Processing Fee (MPF).
- BTariff-rate quota permits a specified quantity of merchandise to be entered or withdrawn for consumption at a reduced duty rate during a specified period.
- CQuota-class merchandise is any imported merchandise subject to limitations under an absolute or a tariff-rate quota.
- DQuota priority is the precedence granted to 1 entry or withdrawal for consumption of quota-class merchandise over other entries or withdrawals of merchandise subject to the same quota.
- EQuota status is the standing which entitles quota-class merchandise to admission under an absolute quota, or to a reduced rate of duty under a tariff-rate quota, or to any other quota benefit.
Show the answer and explanation
The correct answer is A because 19 CFR 10.402(c) defines "claim for preferential tariff treatment" as a claim for duty rates under the US-CFTA (not the US-Chile FTA) and an MPF exemption, not as an "absolute quota." Option A incorrectly attributes the definition of an absolute quota to a claim under the US-Chile FTA, which is not referenced in the cited text. The other options align with definitions in 19 CFR 10.402 and 132.1: B correctly describes a tariff-rate quota, C defines quota-class merchandise accurately, D explains quota priority, and E defines quota status. The error in A lies in misapplying the term "claim" to an absolute quota rather than the specific preferential tariff treatment defined in 10.402(c).
April 2022, Q66. Which of the following is the formula for determining the regional value content (RVC) using the net cost method?
- ANet cost minus the value of the originating materials, divided by the net cost, multiplied by 100
- BNet cost minus the value of the non-originating materials, divided by the net cost, multiplied by 100
- CNet cost minus the value of the originating materials, divided by the net cost, multiplied by 100
- DNet cost minus the value of the non-originating materials, divided by the transaction value, multiplied by 100
- ENet cost minus the value of the non-originating materials, multiplied by the transaction value, divided by 100
Show the answer and explanation
The correct answer is B because the net cost method formula, as stated in 19 CFR 10.1015(d)(2), explicitly defines RVC as ((NC VNM)/NC) × 100, where NC is net cost and VNM is the value of non-originating materials. This matches option B precisely. Options A and C incorrectly reference "originating materials" instead of "non-originating," which contradicts the cited rule. Options D and E misapply the denominator (transaction value instead of net cost) or invert the mathematical operations, which are not supported by the authority.
April 2023, Q8. Under which of the following circumstances will the importer NOT be required to have a bond containing conditions set forth in 19 CFR 113.62 to obtain release of merchandise under a special permit for immediate delivery?
- AAn importation of quota-class merchandise.
- BAn importation under an end-of-year authorization issued by CBP Headquarters.
- CAn importation of goods from a contiguous country, namely Canada and Mexico.
- DA release from a warehouse followed by a warehouse withdrawal for consumption.
- EAn importation by the U.S. Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
Show the answer and explanation
The correct answer is E because 19 CFR 10.101(d) explicitly states that no bond is required for shipments consigned to a U.S. government agency, including the U.S. Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, if a stipulation is filed. This stipulation replaces the bond requirement under 19 CFR 113.62. The other options (A, B, C, D) do not involve shipments to a U.S. government agency, which is the sole condition for exemption from the bond requirement under the cited authority. The text does not mention quota-class merchandise, end-of-year authorizations, contiguous countries, or warehouse withdrawals as exceptions to the bond requirement.
April 2023, Q28. Authorized Automated Commercial Environment (ACE) users can create blanket declaration records in the ACE Secure Data Portal EXCEPT for which one of the following?
- AAffidavit of Manufacture supporting a 9802 duty preference claim signed by the U.S. producer of ceramic coffee mugs exported to be painted with a logo and then reimported.
- BAffidavit of Manufacture from a U.S. cotton thread manufacturer for a Dominican Republic-Central America-United States Free Trade Agreement (DR-CAFTA) duty preference claim for an importation of cotton apparel.
- CStatement by an importer including a description of the processing of imported merchandise in sufficient detail to show that the use contemplated by the law has actually taken place in support of a reduced rate of duty.
- DStatement by an importer declaring that the importer qualifies for a tariff preference program covering multiple shipments of identical goods over an eleven-month period.
- EBlanket certificate stating that the importer has not been reimbursed by the manufacturer, producer, seller, or exporter for antidumping (AD) duties.
Show the answer and explanation
The correct answer is A because 19 CFR 10.138 requires certificates under 9802 to be specific to each entry, not blanket declarations, as the regulation does not permit blanket certificates for 9802 claims. Options B and D involve DR-CAFTA and tariff preference programs, which are explicitly allowed under ACE rules for blanket declarations. Option C aligns with the regulation’s requirement for detailed processing descriptions in blanket certificates. Option E is permitted as a blanket certificate for AD duties, as no restriction on this is stated in the cited authority.
April 2023, Q72. Which one of the following is NOT a program providing special tariff treatment?
- AAgreement on Trade in Civil Aircraft
- BAutomotive Products Trade Act
- CGeneralized System of Preferences
- DTrade Facilitation and Trade Enforcement Act
- EUnited States-Morocco Free Trade Agreement
Show the answer and explanation
The correct answer is D because the Trade Facilitation and Trade Enforcement Act does not provide special tariff treatment; it focuses on procedural improvements and enforcement rather than duty exemptions or reductions. The other options (A, B, C, E) are explicitly referenced in the cited authority as programs offering special tariff benefits, such as duty-free entry under the Automotive Products Trade Act (19 CFR 10.84) or preferential treatment under free trade agreements and the Generalized System of Preferences. The cited text does not mention the Trade Facilitation and Trade Enforcement Act in the context of tariff programs, confirming its exclusion.
April 2023, Q73. Which of the following would NOT be used to support a claim by the importer of petroleum products classified in Heading 2710 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule for preferential treatment under the Caribbean Basin Trade Partnership Act (CBTPA)?
- APurchase orders, invoices, bills of lading and other shipping documents, and customs import and clearance documents for the country of manufacture showing U.S.-origin crude oil was used in the production of the imported merchandise.
- BA completed Certificate of Origin showing that the petroleum products meet the rules of origin for the Bahamas.
- CRecords showing that internal controls were established and implemented requiring the periodic review of the accuracy of the Certificate of Origin or other applicable origin records.
- DShipping papers showing the shipment from the CBTPA beneficiary country directly to the United States without being shipped through a country other than a CBTPA beneficiary country.
- EA CBP Form 450 in English signed by the exporter applicable to multiple importations by the U.S. importer over a one-year period from the date of the exporter's signature.
Show the answer and explanation
The correct answer is B because the Certificate of Origin alone does not establish compliance with the specific rules of origin for petroleum products in Heading 2710 under the CBTPA. According to 19 CFR 10.237(b)(1), the importer must provide records demonstrating that the article meets the applicable rule of origin, which for petroleum products likely requires evidence of U.S. material use (as per General Note 11, HTSUS). A Certificate of Origin showing the Bahamas as the country of origin does not confirm compliance with the rule of origin for this commodity, which may require U.S. crude oil content. Options A, C, and D provide documentation related to U.S. materials, internal controls, and direct shipment, which are relevant to verifying compliance. Option E is a valid form for multiple importations.
April 2025, Q61. At which of the following ports of entry may an antique article otherwise prohibited entry by the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 USC 1521, et seq.) (Endangered Species Act) be entered? The merchandise meets all other U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service requirements.
- AO'Hare International Airport, Chicago, Illinois
- BService Port, Port Angeles, Washington
- CRochester International Airport, Rochester, Minnesota
- DArea Port, Tampa, Florida
Show the answer and explanation
The correct answer is A because 19 CFR 10.53(e)(4) requires antique articles prohibited by the Endangered Species Act to be entered at a port designated in §12.26 of the regulations. O'Hare International Airport is a designated port under 19 CFR 12.26(g)(2), which lists eligible ports for such entries. The other options are not designated ports under this rule, making them ineligible even if all other requirements are met. The authority explicitly ties entry eligibility to designated ports, which only includes O'Hare in this context.
April 2025, Q74. Company A, based in the United States, sells and rents high end sports cars. In 2015, Company A imported an Italian sports car from Italy and paid all applicable duties and taxes. In 2020, Company A leased the car to a client in China and exported it to him. The car did not meet the specifications agreed upon in the contract; however, the client continued to drive it for the remainder of the lease. The sports car was not subjected to any repairs or alterations while in China. In 2024, Company A then reimported the car into the United States. What statement is correct upon reimportation into the United States?
- AThe sports car may be imported duty-free under subheading 9801.00.10, HTSUS.
- BThe sports car may be imported duty-free under subheading 9802.00.50, HTSUS, because no repairs or alterations were made while in China.
- CThe sports car may be imported duty-free as it did not meet the specifications agreed to in the contract and was returned.
- DThe sports car may be imported duty-free because the car was leased out by the importer.
Show the answer and explanation
The correct answer is D because the car was exported under a lease agreement and reimported by the original importer, satisfying the conditions of HTSUS 9801.00.20, which allows duty-free reimportation of articles exported under lease agreements without improvement or advancement in value. Option A is incorrect because 9801.00.10 applies to goods returned within three years without improvement, not leased goods. Option B is incorrect because 9802.00.50 pertains to articles returned for repairs or alterations, which did not occur here. Option C is incorrect because 9801.00.25 applies to goods returned due to non-conformance with specifications, not leased goods.
April 2026, Q35. Which of the following is NOT a requirement with respect to additional articles or classes of articles designated Instruments of International Traffic?
- AGenerally, a container that has been designated an Instrument of International Traffic must exit the United States within 365 days of the date on which it was admitted for it to be deemed to remain in international traffic.
- BNormal accessories and equipment must be imported with a “container” that qualifies as an Instrument of International Traffic to, themselves, be included in “instruments of international traffic.”
- CEntry or the payment of duty prior to release, subject to the provisions of the relevant CBP regulation.
- DFiling of a bond on CBP Form 301, or its electronic equivalent in ACE eBond, containing the bond conditions set forth in 19 CFR 113.66, prior to release.
Show the answer and explanation
The correct answer is C because 19 CFR 10.41a does not require entry or payment of duty prior to release for instruments of international traffic. Instead, entry for consumption is required only if the container remains in the U.S. beyond 365 days, as outlined in paragraph (3). Option A is correct because the 365-day rule is explicitly stated in (3). Option B is correct because the text implies that accessories are included with the container, though not explicitly detailed. Option D is incorrect because the text does not mention bond requirements, but the question asks for the option that is NOT a requirement, making C the correct choice.
October 2018, Q55. Under subheading 9802.00.80 HTSUS, the following operation may be performed to allow fabricated components, the product of the United States, to be deducted from the full value of articles assembled abroad:
- ATrimming small amounts of excess materials
- BCutting arms for a blouse
- CShowerproofing
- DCase hardening
- EMelting of exported ingots & pouring of metal into molds to produce cast metal parts
Show the answer and explanation
The correct answer is A because 19 CFR 10.16(b)(4) explicitly lists trimming, filing, or cutting off small amounts of excess materials as operations incidental to the assembly process, which are permissible under subheading 9802.00.80 HTSUS. Option E is incorrect because melting ingots and pouring metal into molds is explicitly excluded in 19 CFR 10.16(c)(1) as a significant fabrication process not incidental to assembly. Option C is excluded in 19 CFR 10.16(c)(3) as chemical treatment imparting new characteristics, and Option B is excluded in 19 CFR 10.16(c)(2) as cutting garment parts according to pattern, which is not incidental. Option D is excluded in 19 CFR 10.16(c)(4) as case hardening imparts significant new qualities.
October 2020 (AM), Q12. A________ must be presented to CBP timely to request an extension to for a Temporary Importation under Bond (TIB) entry.
- ACBP Form 3173
- BCBP Form 3461
- CCBP Form 3495
- DCBP Form 6043
- ECBP Form 7501
Show the answer and explanation
The correct answer is A) CBP Form 3173 because 19 CFR 10.37 explicitly states that extensions for Temporary Importation under Bond (TIB) entries must be requested via a written application on this form. The other options (B–E) are not mentioned in the cited authority, which does not reference any other form for this purpose. The regulation specifies that Form 3173 is the only applicable form for such requests, making the other options incorrect by elimination and lack of textual support.
October 2020 (AM), Q65. What regulation would you find the verification authority for the United States-Chile Free Trade Agreement (US-CFTA)?
- A19 CFR 10.183
- B19 CFR 10.401
- C19 CFR 10.501
- D19 CFR 10.581
- E19 CFR 10.827
Show the answer and explanation
The correct answer is B) 19 CFR 10.401, as the cited authority explicitly states that this subpart implements the duty preference and customs provisions under the US-CFTA, including verification authority. Other options (A, C, D, E) are not mentioned in the text as relating to the US-CFTA, and their relevance to other agreements or general customs rules does not apply here. The authority is grounded in the specific reference to 19 CFR 10.401 in the provided Title 19 CFR text.
October 2020 (AM), Q80. A manufacturer in the United States takes used car parts and refurbishes them for resale in the United States. He exports old car bumpers, which he buys for $70 each, to Brazil for repair of cracks and dents. He pays the Brazilian body shop $50 for the repairs to each bumper. The repaired bumpers are valued at $150 each. Upon import back into the United States, the bumpers are painted, polished, and then sold to customers for $200 each. The bumpers are classifiable under subheading 8708.10.30 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), dutiable at 2.5% ad valorem. What is the least amount of duty owed on this merchandise?
- A5
- B3.75
- C0
- D1.25
- E3.25 STOP
Show the answer and explanation
The correct answer is D) $1.25 because the duty is calculated based on the value of the repairs performed abroad, not the total value of the imported item. Under 19 CFR 10.8, the duty applies only to the cost of the repairs ($50), which when multiplied by the 2.5% ad valorem rate yields $1.25. Other options are incorrect because they either apply the rate to the full value of the item ($150 or $200) or assume no duty applies, which contradicts the explicit requirement in 19 CFR 10.8(d) to assess duty on the repair cost. The HTSUS subheading 9802.00.50 explicitly states the duty is based on the value of the repairs or alterations.
October 2020 (PM), Q11. A Temporary Importation Bond (TIB) Entry is allowed to remain in Customs territory of the United States for one year. If the importer wishes to file an extension prior to the expiration of the TIB, what is the maximum time period allowed that may be granted on a TIB Entry extension?
- AOne year
- BTwo years
- CThree years
- DFour years
- ENone
Show the answer and explanation
The correct answer is B) Two years, as 19 CFR 10.37 explicitly states that a TIB Entry may be extended for "not more than two further periods of 1 year each," meaning the maximum extension period granted is two years. Option A) One year refers to the original TIB period, not the extension. Options C) Three years and D) Four years exceed the statutory limit. Option E) None is incorrect because extensions are explicitly permitted under the regulation.
October 2020 (PM), Q19. Merchandise was exported from the United States on a U.S. issued ATA carnet to Italy. The carnet has now expired and the merchandise was not re-imported to the United States. How much will the U.S. assess the carnet holder in liquidated damages?
- A100% of the import duties and taxes
- B110% of the import duties and taxes
- C150% of the import duties and taxes
- DThree times the value of the merchandise
- EThere will be no penalties or duties assessed by the United States
Show the answer and explanation
The correct answer is E) There will be no penalties or duties assessed by the United States. The direction of travel is the whole question. A U.S.-issued ATA carnet covers goods leaving the United States to be temporarily imported somewhere else, here Italy. The merchandise was never imported into the United States under that carnet, so there is no U.S. entry to liquidate, no U.S. duties to secure, and nothing for CBP to claim against. The U.S. carnet provisions run the other way. 19 CFR 114.33 allows action against a carnet user for applicable duties and charges or liquidated damages where the privileges of the Convention are abused, and 19 CFR 114.34(b) addresses cancelling liquidated damages assessed for failure to reexport merchandise "temporarily imported under cover of" a carnet. Both are about merchandise brought into the United States. If anyone has a claim on these facts it is Italian customs, against the guaranteeing association, for goods that entered Italy under the carnet and were not taken back out. The percentages in options A through D are the sort of security a foreign customs administration may hold, not something CBP assesses on a U.S. export.
October 2021, Q65. Would kombucha concentrate powder, classified under subheading 2106.90.98, HTSUS, be eligible for duty-free treatment after importation if it qualified as originating goods under the U.S.- Colombia Trade Promotion Agreement (CTPA) when it was imported into the United States, but no claim for preferential tariff treatment was made?
- AYes, if the importer files a claim for duty-free treatment under CTPA within 1 year after the date of importation.
- BYes, if the importer files a claim for duty-free treatment under CTPA within 5 years after the date of importation.
- CYes, if the importer files a claim for duty-free treatment under CTPA within 180 days after the date of importation.
- DNo, because goods classified under 2106.90.98, HTSUS, are not eligible for duty-free treatment under CTPA.
- ENo, because claims for a refund after importation cannot be made under CTPA.
Show the answer and explanation
The correct answer is A because 19 CFR 10.3033 allows an importer to file a claim for preferential tariff treatment under CTPA within one year after importation, even if no claim was initially made. Options B and C are incorrect because the cited authority does not mention 5-year or 180-day periods for claims. Option D is incorrect because the HTSUS classification (2106.90.98) does not determine eligibility for CTPA; eligibility depends on the goods being "originating" under the agreement, not their tariff number. Option E is incorrect because 19 CFR 10.3033 explicitly permits post-importation claims within one year.
October 2021, Q67. Under what section in the 19 CFR would you find information on United States-Oman Free Trade Agreement?
- A19 CFR 10.191
- B19 CFR 10.241
- C19 CFR 10.701
- D19 CFR 10.861
- E19 CFR 10.901
Show the answer and explanation
The correct answer is D) 19 CFR 10.861 because the cited text explicitly states that this subpart implements the United States-Oman Free Trade Agreement (OFTA), including its duty preference and customs provisions. The other options (A, B, C, E) are not referenced in the cited authority, which focuses solely on 19 CFR 10.861 as the implementing regulation for the OFTA. The text also notes that additional provisions are in Parts 24, 162, and 163, but these are supplementary, not the primary source for the agreement’s customs rules.
October 2021, Q71. Operations incidental to the assembly process whether performed before, during, or after assembly, do not constitute further fabrication, and will not preclude the application of the exemption. The following are examples of operations which are incidental to the assembly process EXCEPT:
- ACleaning
- BRemoval of rust, grease, paint, or other preservative coating
- CTrimming, filing, or cutting off of small amounts of excess materials
- DCutting of garment parts according to pattern from exported material
- EFinal calibration, testing, marking, sorting, pressing and folding of assembled articles
Show the answer and explanation
The correct answer is D because 19 CFR 10.16(c)(2) explicitly lists "cutting of garment parts according to pattern from exported material" as an operation not incidental to assembly, thereby disqualifying it from the exemption. Options A, B, C, and E are all enumerated in 19 CFR 10.16(b)(1), (2), (4), and (7), respectively, as examples of operations that are considered incidental to assembly and thus eligible for the exemption. The distinction hinges on whether the operation is directly related to preparing components for assembly or modifying them in a way that constitutes fabrication, which D does by altering exported material according to a pattern, a process deemed significant and non-incidental under the regulation.
October 2022, Q40. Which CBP Form must be presented to CBP timely to request authorization for bonded merchandise to be transported to another port or exported out of the country?
- ACBP Form 3461
- BCBP Form 3495
- CCBP Form 6043
- DCBP Form 7501
- ECBP Form 7512
Show the answer and explanation
The correct answer is E) CBP Form 7501 because 19 CFR 10.60(a) explicitly states that withdrawals from warehouse, which include requests to transport bonded merchandise to another port or export, must be made on CBP Form 7501. The other options (A–D) are not referenced in the cited text, and no authority is provided to link them to the scenario described. The rule is confined to the section provided, which directly ties Form 7501 to the required procedure for such withdrawals.
October 2023, Q59. Is kombucha concentrate powder, classified under subheading 2106.90.99, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the U.S. (HTSUS), eligible for duty-free treatment after importation as a qualified originating good under the U.S.- Colombia Trade Promotion Agreement (CTPA) if the importer claimed no preferential tariff treatment when it was imported into the United States?
- AYes, if the importer files a claim for duty-free treatment under CTPA within one year after the date of importation.
- BYes, if the importer files a claim for duty-free treatment under CTPA within five years after the date of importation.
- CNo, because goods classified under 2106.90.99, HTSUS, are not eligible for duty-free treatment under CTPA.
- DNo, because claims for a refund after importation cannot be made under CTPA.
Show the answer and explanation
The correct answer is A because the U.S.-Colombia Trade Promotion Agreement (CTPA) allows importers to file a claim for duty-free treatment within one year after importation, as specified in 19 CFR 10.3001-10.3033. This timeframe is explicitly outlined in the implementing regulations, making option A valid. Option B is incorrect because the five-year period is not referenced in the CTPA or its implementing rules. Option C is wrong because the HTSUS classification (2106.90.99) does not determine CTPA eligibility; eligibility depends on the claim process, not the tariff code itself. Option D is incorrect because the CTPA explicitly permits post-importation claims within the one-year window, contrary to the assertion in D.
October 2025, Q56. Jane Doe wants to import liquid chemicals in stainless steel tanks that are capable of being used repeatedly. The tanks are emptied of the liquid chemicals at importation and exported empty in order to be refilled. Ms. Doe does not want to make entry or pay duty for these tanks, which will be exported and reimported continuously. Ms. Doe is considering having these tanks designated as Instruments of International Traffic (IITs). Which of the following statements concerning IITs is TRUE?
- AA steel tank may be designated as an IIT that is exempt from ordinary duties, but will remain subject to antidumping and countervailing duties.
- BA steel tank that is designated as an IIT must be exported from the United States within 365 days of admission.
- CA steel tank may only be designated as an IIT if Ms. Doe obtains a basic custodial bond.
- DA steel tank may be designated as an IIT that is exempt from entry, but will remain subject to vessel reporting requirements.
Show the answer and explanation
Option B is defensible because 19 CFR 10.41a(j) explicitly states that a container designated as an IIT must exit the United States within 365 days of admission, aligning with the 365-day requirement in the option. Option D is defensible because 19 CFR 10.41a(a)(1) permits IITs to be released without entry, and 19 CFR 4.2(a) (not detailed in the text) likely imposes vessel reporting requirements on containers, which are not waived by IIT designation. The other options are not supported by the cited text: A is incorrect because the text does not address exemptions from antidumping or countervailing duties; C is incorrect because the text does not mention a custodial bond requirement for IIT designation.
CBP credited more than one answer for this question: B, D.
October 2025, Q75. When determining if goods qualify for the United States-Colombia Free Trade Agreement, which of the following is NOT a permissible addition to the value of originating materials?
- AThe cost of freight and insurance to import U.S. origin raw material to produce Colombian goods.
- BThe duties and taxes paid on the importation of U.S. origin raw material to produce Colombian goods.
- CThe cost of wasted originating material that results from producing the originating finished good.
- DThe depreciated value of originating U.S. equipment used to produce Colombian goods.
Show the answer and explanation
The correct answer is D because 19 CFR 10.3016(c)(1)(iv) explicitly permits additions to the value of originating materials for freight, insurance, duties, taxes, and waste costs but does not include depreciation of equipment. The rule focuses on direct costs tied to the material’s importation, use, or transformation, not on capital asset depreciation. Options A, B, and C are explicitly listed in 19 CFR 10.3016(c)(1)(i) and (iii) as permissible additions. Option D is excluded because depreciation of equipment is not a cost directly related to the material’s value under the FTA rules.
October 2025, Q76. Orange juice in bulk containers is imported into the United States from Morocco. The orange juice is produced as follows: Oranges classified under heading 0805 are imported from Spain into Morocco. Purified water from France is imported into Morocco. Calcium citrate, a preservative, is manufactured in Morocco. The juice from the oranges (25% by volume and 70% by value), water (74.75% by volume and 29.5% by value), and calcium citrate (0.25% by volume and 0.5% by value) are combined in Morocco and repackaged in bulk containers prior to being exported to the United States. Upon importation, the orange juice will be classified under subheading 2009.12.2500. Which of the following correctly states the originating country, special program indicator, and rate of duty for the described orange juice?
- AMorocco; MA; Free
- BMorocco; None; 4.5₵ per liter
- CSpain; None; 4.5₵ per liter
- DFrance; E; Free
Show the answer and explanation
The correct answer is C because the orange juice is not an originating good under the MFTA. The juice is made from non-originating materials (oranges from Spain, water from France) and calcium citrate produced in Morocco. Under 19 CFR 10.770(a)(3)(i)(A), non-originating materials must undergo an applicable change in tariff classification. The oranges (heading 0805) are processed into juice (heading 2009.12), which satisfies the change in classification. However, the value-content requirement (19 CFR 10.770(b)) is not met, as the value of materials produced in Morocco (0.5%) plus processing costs likely fall below 35% of the appraised value. Since the juice does not originate under the MFTA, the originating country is Spain (source of the oranges), and the rate of duty is 4.5₵ per liter under a different subheading (not 2009.12.45.00). Options A and D are incorrect because Morocco is not the originating country, and France is not a party to the MFTA. Option B is incorrect because the juice does not qualify for the MFTA preferential rate.
CBLEsim is free: every past-exam question CBP has released, the CFR and the HTSUS a tap away, timed mock exams, and tracking that sends you back to what you keep missing.
Start practising free